Asexuality isn't defined by it's lack of "romantic" attaraction (romantic and sexual attraction are often seperated in the asexual community since it's apparently possible to experience one without the other). It wouldn't make sense to assume asexuality due to a lack of experience with partners or girl/boyfriends. Asexuality is defined by it's lack of sexual attraction, sooo...
maxi106 wrote:
asexuals are not sexually attracted to anybody which means they wouldn't want to have sex with anyone
This actually, is only half true. The whole "they don't want sex" thing is a misunderstanding of the defintion. It's entirely possible to lack sexual attraction and to desire sex at the same time... keeping in mind that a desire for sex could be for any reason, perhaps they want to please their partner (very common case)? That's a desire for sex right there
Stalk wrote:
I wonder if there is such a thing as LGBT asexual?
There is, though the relationship between the asexual community and the LGBT is usually difficult (it's sort of sad, but the LGBT community can be judgemental... though it's probably something to do with the mass amount of asexuals who storm in there and declare how gross sex and sexual acts are). You'll find that there are asexuals who will avoid any association with the LGBT at all costs too though I'm not sure why, the reasoning usually differs
AVEN (Asexual Visibility & Education Network) is explicitly simple with its defintion, "An asexual person is a person who
does not experience sexual attraction". It's usually interpreted differently, but I think that was the original intention... this defintion was (I think??) written some it could be more flexible. Sexual repulsion, social anxiety, antisexualism and even Asperger's are commonly found in the asexual community, though there's no direct connection between either of those or asexuality