11 Aug 2013, 4:22 pm
appletheclown wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Would you reject a virgin as a date, spouse, or FWB?
[X] No. Virginity is neither a deal-breaker nor a deal-maker.
[X] No. Virginity is neither a deal-breaker nor a deal-maker.
Good for you! (there was a both option)
It's much the same as what I said, but with different words.
Why wasn't this an option ?
"Both - I know what I want" is (IMHO) a lame way to approximate that, and doesn't even really make sense in the context of the question.
"Would you reject a virgin as a date, spouse, or FWB?"
"Both - I know what I want"
So... both means..... you would both reject them and not reject them ?
Or it means.... you would reject them both for being a date/spouse, and as a FWB ?
Ambiguous loaded poll is ambiguous and loaded.
11 Aug 2013, 4:25 pm
Ladywoofwoof wrote:
appletheclown wrote:
Ladywoofwoof wrote:
albedo wrote:
appletheclown wrote:
If it isn't that big of a deal, then it shouldn't matter if you think your virgin date is beautiful, oh wait it does in all cases.
how empirical of you
Not to mention overly presumptious and judgemental, with a dash of psychological projection.
Talk about loaded poll options.....
Why, do you think people you date are ugly? It isn't loaded at all.
So you prefer virgins, huh ?
Well, the two (highly loaded) poll options for that are :
(1) No, virgin men are so vulnerable and irresistable!
(2) No, virgin women are so beautiful!
You appear to be into women.... so what are you saying here ?
That women who aren't virgins are less beautiful than women who are ?
Are you saying this poll wasn't about virgins in the first place, and should have never had more than a yes or no option? I have a heart for ladies who aren't virgins too, who are you to speak for it, it being my heart?
11 Aug 2013, 4:27 pm
Eh ?
Please at least make a bit of effort to make sense.
11 Aug 2013, 4:28 pm
Ladywoofwoof wrote:
appletheclown wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Would you reject a virgin as a date, spouse, or FWB?
[X] No. Virginity is neither a deal-breaker nor a deal-maker.
[X] No. Virginity is neither a deal-breaker nor a deal-maker.
Good for you! (there was a both option)
It's much the same as what I said, but with different words.
Why wasn't this an option ?
"Both - I know what I want" is (IMHO) a lame way to approximate that, and doesn't even really make sense in the context of the question.
"Would you reject a virgin as a date, spouse, or FWB?"
"Both - I know what I want"
So... both means..... you would both reject them and not reject them ?
Or it means.... you would reject them both for being a date/spouse, and as a FWB ?
Ambiguous loaded poll is ambiguous and loaded.
I could care less now, your starting to anger me. And it means you would reject anyone if you didn't want to date them. You reject someone before a date, sheesh!
11 Aug 2013, 4:30 pm
Ladywoofwoof wrote:
Eh ?
Please at least make a bit of effort to make sense.
Please at least make a bit of effort to make sense.
Please be less belligerent and obnoxious, at least fnord was respectful, and stoped antagonizing me.
11 Aug 2013, 4:30 pm
11 Aug 2013, 4:32 pm
11 Aug 2013, 4:33 pm
appletheclown wrote:
Ladywoofwoof wrote:
appletheclown wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Would you reject a virgin as a date, spouse, or FWB?
[X] No. Virginity is neither a deal-breaker nor a deal-maker.
[X] No. Virginity is neither a deal-breaker nor a deal-maker.
Good for you! (there was a both option)
It's much the same as what I said, but with different words.
Why wasn't this an option ?
"Both - I know what I want" is (IMHO) a lame way to approximate that, and doesn't even really make sense in the context of the question.
"Would you reject a virgin as a date, spouse, or FWB?"
"Both - I know what I want"
So... both means..... you would both reject them and not reject them ?
Or it means.... you would reject them both for being a date/spouse, and as a FWB ?
Ambiguous loaded poll is ambiguous and loaded.
I could care less now, your starting to anger me. And it means you would reject anyone if you didn't want to date them. You reject someone before a date, sheesh!
Please be less belligerent and obnoxious, at least fnord was respectful, and stoped antagonizing me.
Pffft it serves you right if you're starting to get angry.
You should try being a bit less belligerent, antagonistic and obnoxious yourself, I reckon.
Where do you even get this information from ?
Do you just pull it out of your arse and immediately type it in without checking any facts, or something ?
Oh well, I guess you're still very young... so maybe your logical thought process will improve with age.
11 Aug 2013, 4:35 pm
11 Aug 2013, 4:35 pm
appletheclown wrote:
albedo wrote:
appletheclown wrote:
If it isn't that big of a deal, then it shouldn't matter if you think your virgin date is beautiful, oh wait it does in all cases.
how empirical of you
Well can't have you calling virgins ugly on dates with them can we? Why date someone when you can't love everything about them, or at least how they look and behave?
What has this got to do with the original question?
Obviously attraction has to do with any romantic relationship.
11 Aug 2013, 4:37 pm
11 Aug 2013, 4:38 pm
Fnord wrote:
appletheclown wrote:
Ladywoofwoof wrote:
appletheclown wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Would you reject a virgin as a date, spouse, or FWB? [X] No. Virginity is neither a deal-breaker nor a deal-maker.
Good for you! (there was a both option)So, if you could care less, then that means that you care.
As for rejecting someone before a date ... well, guess what? It happens all of the time!
Sheesh!
Yup... his level of caring is so high that there is ample space for him to care less, apparently.
I'm not even sure what he's complaining about.... that people reject people before a date, if they don't want to date them ?
My god, it shouldn't be allowed.... throw those people in jail !
11 Aug 2013, 4:38 pm
11 Aug 2013, 4:40 pm
Cafeaulait wrote:
Honestly, I like a guy that knows how to use their willy
It's understandable... but let's face it, slinging the metaphorical sausage up the chute once during a first-time shuffle probably doesn't make a heck of a lot of difference for some guys.
I'm not sure if that would give enough EXP for a guy to even level up to being a Lv. 2 Willy Wielder, in a lot of cases.
11 Aug 2013, 4:40 pm
11 Aug 2013, 4:42 pm
Ladywoofwoof wrote:
Cafeaulait wrote:
Honestly, I like a guy that knows how to use their willy
It's understandable... but let's face it, slinging the metaphorical sausage up the chute once during a first-time shuffle probably doesn't make a heck of a lot of difference for some guys. I'm not sure if that would give enough EXP for a guy to even level up to being a Lv. 2 Willy Wielder, in a lot of cases.
Yeah. I´m just trolling. I don´t mind if the guy is a virgin, as long as the sausage is 8 inches or more
Size can make up everything
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Apple shareholders reject ban on diversity programs |
25 Feb 2025, 11:24 pm |
| So, I have a date |
30 Jan 2025, 3:40 pm |
