The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
leafplant wrote:
^ everything is relative
I am astounded that you feel entitled to mock other people for their attitudes when you are exceptionally picky yourself
I mocking her statement because I find it stupid and illogical? She is a millionaire for f***ing sake! She doesn't need anyone to lift any financial burden for her! The interests from her bank accounts would be enough to make her children live a decent life.
Why millionaires men aren't that concerned about the "financial burden" while seeking for a partner?
your reasoning is completely illogical. For one, the financial burden of putting one, nevermind four children through private education and ivy league universities easily runs into millions. And being a millionaire is relative because depending on the social circles a person moves in their house alone would cost millions which together with upkeep and living expenses would obliterate most of the interest from, say, a 20 million nest egg in the bank. Then there is the clothes, the holidays etc etc - while to you it's crazy extravagant to spend 100,000 on a holiday, somebody like that may feel that they have to in order to maintain their social status. Not everyone can manage to be Warren Buffet.
now, for your other question, there is no data to suggest that millionaire men aren't as concerned about the financial burden - exactly the opposite in fact - otherwise that joke about the banker who wrote the Facebook message to that gold digger woman wouldn't have happened. He would have been only too thrilled to spend his money without care in the world - by your reasoning (which you seem to change around to suit)