hale_bopp wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
It's ok, you've learned to not say things that would be perceived as creepy by others.
It was more about trusting him too much. I knew it was a weird thing to say, but I thought he would be cool with it.
This brings to mind another angle. Could he be one of those people who says one thing verbally, then contradicts or nullifies what he said non-verbally? A minority of neurotypicals are very, very indirect and almost never verbally say what they mean. You can get fooled by them, because they actually change personas, having one way of communicating by email, another by telephone, and a third in-person. I wonder if he verbally projects all sorts of little falsehoods that he modifies non-verbally.
POST EDIT: During my career, I've been an employee, contractor, or done some consulting functions for large companies, including John Deere, Corning, Alcoa, Cargill, Microsoft, State Farm Insurance, Allstate Insurance, and a bunch more. In all of those companies, politics is thick. I've learned there are three primary groups who regularly use non-verbal contradictions: 1) Those who are indirect by individual nature or culture - for some, indirectness is an avoidant behavior; 2) Those who tend to build deniability into their communications - not outright dishonest, but politically savvy; and 3) Those for whom dishonesty is a fundamental part of their character. Does you co-worker fit any of those?