Kezzstar wrote:
It's all respect for boundaries. Like if I said "No" to a guy, and he respectfully backed off while maintaining a friendship that wasn't wholely and solely about getting me to fall in love with him, then that can be classed as romantic persistance. Whereas maintaining a friendship just to try and get me to love him and/or disrespecting my boundaries will get you classed as a creep for sure.
It's also an early-warning thing. As kids, we're told to trust our gut and if a situation feels dangerous, then get the hell out of there. If I get even the whiff of a bad gut feeling from anyone, male or female, I don't associate with them. Am I being judgemental and mean? Yup. But if it keeps me safe, then it's worth hurting the odd feeling or two (and usually those gut feelings are right anyway - got yelled at on a train by a guy who was making my gut feel bad, all because I happened to look up from my book when he was looking at me and accidently made eye contact - thankfully he got off the train about a minute later).
seems more like unequated love rather then romantic persistence. as it would be him remaining friends with you with the false hope you'll one day love him back.
romantic persistence would be continueing to try to get the girl to love you. like sending flowers, doing special things. if hes being your friend and not doing anything other then friend stuff then its not romantic. o.O