Page 2 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,115
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

08 Jun 2015, 3:22 am

hurtloam wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
It simply means sexual attraction; but people like to use more polite and more 'mysterious' and romantic terms.

ie. Her: "There was no chemistry" .

Translation: "I didn't find him hot enough, wouldn't get aroused by him".

And yes, sexual attraction may grow slowly or fast.


Nope, nope, nope, I've literally just text my friend that I've given up on a guy because there was no chemistry/connection. We did spend some time around each other today and we had absolutely nothing to talk about. He's still good looking, I'm still attracted to him, but there's just nothing else there. We've got no communication chemistry. We've known each other a couple of years and we've just got nothing to talk about. No matter how attracted to him I am there's just that point where you have to give up because you can't force a connection.


So I was right about my prediction.

You did have a boyfriend lately :lol:.

Your case is calling lack of communication, or simply "he's boring" - call it as it is, why using the ambiguous Chemistry word?

Chemistry is a stupid word to be used in romance context, and it's a term often used by women rather by men because it sounds mystifying, like the horoscopes.

ie. I met him on first date, but I didn't like him, I didn't find him sexually attractive --> Sounds shallow and dirty.

ie. I met him on first date, but there was no Chemistry --> Sounds mystifying and deep.

:lol:



Ban-Dodger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jun 2011
Age: 1027
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,820
Location: Возможно в будущее к Россию идти... можеть быть...

08 Jun 2015, 3:30 am

Only twice (two different girls) and it was only really due to ridiculous amounts of coincidences between us & reminders of them followed by even more absurd amounts of coincidences & reminders. I think it has more to do with some kind of phenomenon when desires just so-happen to converge & your "minds" somehow become "linked" in that "spooky interaction at a distance" fashion. This has only happened during times of my life when I engaged in such activities like frequent & consistent meditation™ (i.e.: practice of increasing mental-sensitivity to surroundings since I was mostly meditating in the context of a martial artist training up his mental-perceptions/awareness-levels for being able to better-detect potential surrounding dangers).


_________________
Pay me for my signature. 私の署名ですか❓お前の買うなければなりません。Mon autographe nécessite un paiement. Которые хочет мою автографу, у тебя нужно есть деньги сюда. Bezahlst du mich, wenn du meine Unterschrift wollen.


314pe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2014
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,013

08 Jun 2015, 4:30 am

hurtloam wrote:
Nope, nope, nope, I've literally just text my friend that I've given up on a guy because there was no chemistry/connection. We did spend some time around each other today and we had absolutely nothing to talk about. He's still good looking, I'm still attracted to him, but there's just nothing else there. We've got no communication chemistry. We've known each other a couple of years and we've just got nothing to talk about. No matter how attracted to him I am there's just that point where you have to give up because you can't force a connection.

Oh, so physical attraction is a part of it, just not all of it?



hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,747
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

11 Jun 2015, 4:45 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
So I was right about my prediction.

You did have a boyfriend lately :lol:.



I could cry. No, no I didn't. I have a friend of a friend who doesn't have any interest in me at all. That's not what a boyfriend is. A boyfriend is usually someone who is aware that you exist and someone that you've at least been on a date with. He would be bewildered that I'd so misrepresented him that people were calling him my boyfriend. He's also a few years younger than me, so I haven't got the confidence to make a move in case I'm seen as a sad old spinster freak. He's just such a decent person he piqued my interest. Our mutual friend invited us to a party with several other mutual friends. Woo, my one of two parties I get invited to a year, that's probably my quota used up now...

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Your case is calling lack of communication, or simply "he's boring" - call it as it is, why using the ambiguous Chemistry word?

Chemistry is a stupid word to be used in romance context, and it's a term often used by women rather by men because it sounds mystifying, like the horoscopes.

ie. I met him on first date, but I didn't like him, I didn't find him sexually attractive --> Sounds shallow and dirty.

ie. I met him on first date, but there was no Chemistry --> Sounds mystifying and deep.

:lol:


Well, I think there's some truth to that in general, but that's not what I meant, he's not boring, he's got a great sense of humour, but I have communication issues and I think I need someone that can talk to me because if they are quiet I often can't think of anything to say. I genuinely don't think he likes me. :(



hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,747
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

11 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm

314pe wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
Nope, nope, nope, I've literally just text my friend that I've given up on a guy because there was no chemistry/connection. We did spend some time around each other today and we had absolutely nothing to talk about. He's still good looking, I'm still attracted to him, but there's just nothing else there. We've got no communication chemistry. We've known each other a couple of years and we've just got nothing to talk about. No matter how attracted to him I am there's just that point where you have to give up because you can't force a connection.

Oh, so physical attraction is a part of it, just not all of it?


Yes, that's how I feel anyway. I'm beginning to think that it's not like that for everyone and the sexual spark trumps all other things for most people, but once upon a time I was good friends with this guy who I had a real connection with. We could talk and talk for hours about anything and everything and it was enjoyable conversation. I just completely enjoyed being around him and enjoying his company. It was just a bonus that I found him attractive. He became more attractive to me the more I got to know him. Anyway, I thought there was a great connection, but by the time I got round to asking him out he had found someone else and now they're married with children. He told me quite clearly that he was not in love with me.



aspiemike
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,287
Location: Canada

11 Jun 2015, 10:46 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
It simply means sexual attraction; but people like to use more polite and more 'mysterious' and romantic terms.

ie. Her: "There was no chemistry" .

Translation: "I didn't find him hot enough, wouldn't get aroused by him".

And yes, sexual attraction may grow slowly or fast.



Also having read the other post you wrote and I agree that I mostly hear the words "Spark" and "chemistry" come from women. Some told me that they felt a spark with me. Others say we had chemistry. The only time I used the chemistry line on someone to let them down, I remember them laughing in my face afterwards. They then called me an idiot for saying such a thing.

Bottom line- Chemistry is often used as a polite letdown by women towards men. Men using it just sounds weird.


_________________
Your Aspie score: 130 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 88 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,115
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

12 Jun 2015, 12:54 am

aspiemike wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
It simply means sexual attraction; but people like to use more polite and more 'mysterious' and romantic terms.

ie. Her: "There was no chemistry" .

Translation: "I didn't find him hot enough, wouldn't get aroused by him".

And yes, sexual attraction may grow slowly or fast.



Also having read the other post you wrote and I agree that I mostly hear the words "Spark" and "chemistry" come from women. Some told me that they felt a spark with me. Others say we had chemistry. The only time I used the chemistry line on someone to let them down, I remember them laughing in my face afterwards. They then called me an idiot for saying such a thing.

Bottom line- Chemistry is often used as a polite letdown by women towards men. Men using it just sounds weird.


The funny thing that it's cross cultural, there are similar terms in French and Arabic and they are used mostly by women.
What's even more funny, that women aren't aware these words aren't used by men.

Where do they learn this stuff? I bet from romantic novels/movies.



yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

12 Jun 2015, 1:39 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
It simply means sexual attraction; but people like to use more polite and more 'mysterious' and romantic terms.

ie. Her: "There was no chemistry" .

Translation: "I didn't find him hot enough, wouldn't get aroused by him".

And yes, sexual attraction may grow slowly or fast.

That's not how I use it, but maybe it's how most women use it. I can be sexually attracted to someone but not feel any chemistry, because the sexual attraction is all there is, or it is one sided, or something like that. Chemistry is a feeling that both parties are experiencing a similar rapport with each other, IMO. A person who thinks there is chemistry might be mistaken in thinking it is mutual, but the perception of it being mutual is there. So, for example, if I'm into someone and I think they are bored by me, I would say there is no chemistry. If I am into someone and it seems like they feel the same and that there is an eagerness to learn more about each other, I'd probably call that chemistry.



CoffinCrawler
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 189
Location: montreal, canada

12 Jun 2015, 3:52 pm

Is chemistry just a fancy term for mutual interest?



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,115
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

12 Jun 2015, 3:57 pm

CoffinCrawler wrote:
Is chemistry just a fancy term for mutual interest?


Hahaha, that's too.

It can be a fancy term for mutual interest.

Or even one-sided interest

Or/And sexual interest, regardless if two sided or not.

..etc

Just a stupid fancy word.



SilverStar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,058
Location: Ohio, USA

22 Jun 2015, 3:02 am

hurtloam wrote:
Well, I think there's some truth to that in general, but that's not what I meant, he's not boring, he's got a great sense of humour, but I have communication issues and I think I need someone that can talk to me because if they are quiet I often can't think of anything to say. I genuinely don't think he likes me. :(



Shy people usually do better with more talkative people. When you get two shy people together, there can be a lot of awkward pauses, and miscommunications.

I can talk to people just fine, as long as they talk to me, but when I come into contact with a really shy person, there is a pressure on me to carry the conversation (in which I am not good at).



TheNameless
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

Joined: 24 Jun 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 91

25 Jun 2015, 2:19 pm

The only time I have felt it in my life has been with my husband. It was the first time I didn't feel like I had to put on an act all the time. He made me feel less self conscious, although that has never completely gone but that is my issue not anything he does to make me feel that way. I never believed in the saying 'felt like I've known them to years' but with him it was true, it felt like we had always been together not yet met.



Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

25 Jun 2015, 3:51 pm

CoffinCrawler wrote:
Is chemistry just a fancy term for mutual interest?

It's a fancy term for a WOMAN's interest. Men are usually happy to have any woman interested in them, real reason be damned.



darkphantomx1
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 1 Feb 2015
Age: 30
Posts: 1,293

25 Jun 2015, 5:14 pm

Iv'e never felt chemistry with a girl before. When I talk to girls, it either goes two ways.

I show too much interest and they think i'm a creeper so they ignore me.

I show too little interest so they think i'm unfriendly and they quickly move on.


I never win when it comes to girls. I wish I wasn't so f*****g shy and I wish I wasn't autistic. Iv'e never gotten a girls number in my life, never had a gf never kissed still a virgin, I'd be lucky to even talk to a girl. I'm a f*****g loser and I doubt that's going to change.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

25 Jun 2015, 10:43 pm

darkphantomx1 wrote:
Iv'e never felt chemistry with a girl before. When I talk to girls, it either goes two ways.

I show too much interest and they think i'm a creeper so they ignore me.

I show too little interest so they think i'm unfriendly and they quickly move on.


I never win when it comes to girls. I wish I wasn't so f*****g shy and I wish I wasn't autistic. Iv'e never gotten a girls number in my life, never had a gf never kissed still a virgin, I'd be lucky to even talk to a girl. I'm a f*****g loser and I doubt that's going to change.


So treat your AS symptoms and change everything for the better. Or do as you've always done and get as you've always got.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


darkphantomx1
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 1 Feb 2015
Age: 30
Posts: 1,293

26 Jun 2015, 1:53 pm

Wow I was in a bad mood that day...


What's a chemistry? I failed that class.