314pe wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Nope, it's not just a matter of players - those are a minority, it's rather simply the huge imbalance in genders too, if you have 1000 online male users right now while there are only 20 females online, then of course they'll feel bombarded even if only the quarter of them message them.
You could improve your chances by choosing better sites. Some dating sites have even worse imbalance whereas others have better or even an opposite ratio. On a christian dating site, not only I get a lot more replies but I even was approached once. I'm very physically unattractive so on most sites I get no replies at all. I imagine aspergers dating site would be even worse.
I tested okcupid right now, I filtered straight girls aged 23-35 and there were only 4 users, two of them with fake pics.
Then I switched to straight guys of same age range, and there were 32.
Imagine those 32 messaging those 4.
When dating sites boast about their gender balanced ratio, they usually include the inactives and the fake profiles - many girls create an account and just leave the next day. Also, so it's way easier for a girl to find a date on dating site, so she's way more likely to find someone earlier hence become inactive one site; so I bet that the number of female inactives are way way way more than male inactives.
What's funny, that the few active women there have developed a degrading view on guys there ie. desperate, online geeks...etc. they complain and whine a lot about how unattractive guys are there and about the one word messages.
Dating sites are great for women but it's a lottery game for men.