article on the difference between wanting and entitlement

Page 2 of 4 [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

18 Nov 2015, 6:59 am

Nocturnus wrote:
Altruism isn't always important in a Darwinian society to have successful relationships, in fact being good isn't a requirement to get what you want in life. Being good or selfless should be a reward in itself and not a vehicle to personal gain.

Social power and leverage are far more important than altruism when it comes to relationships.


It's not a requirement, but like you said many people enjoy being a good person and don't just be good for personal gain. Maybe it is entitled to think 'where's my reward?" but it's less so feeling entitled to a reward, and more so feeling frustrated absolutely terrible people can be far more well-off in life than you are while doing nothing in life to show the least bit of gratitude.

This is high school all over again. The kid who grew up with a poor and underclassed background ends up being hardworking, respectful, grateful and giving, yet he has less social power and leverage than your typical first-world, sheltered, spoiled brat who can't even appreciate what their parents do for them, let alone their school and/or society.

I will re-state once again, life is unfair, but who are we to allow the world to continue with inequality? The change starts only with us. Why can't someone, anyone in this world stand-up and say to the spoiled rich brat that hey, maybe they should say thank you to their parents and teachers more often, especially if all they do is whine and b*tch about their teachers getting angry at them when they misbehave. It may be self-righteous, but someone's got to do it. I'm the kind of person that believes when it comes to someone who needs to learn a lesson, someone who might need to learn actions have consequences, or someone who needs to learn to keep their kouth shut, whatever, someone's got to do it, and someone will eventually. The question is, why not you?

But we don't have to be negative and critical of other's either. What about that person who grew up from a poor family and was only lucky for his family to even afford high school and is hardworking, dedicated, etc. but still bullied by other students. Again, someone could stand up for them. Why not you?

Apply my high school analogy to the 'real world'.

Yeah, not everyone actually wants help, and the blindly ignorant like to enjoy thinking they are right, and a lot of the time there's nothing wrong with not getting involved - it's your life and your choices, you shouldn't have to waste your time on others if you don't want to. It's certainly not our duty, but there's nothing wrong with a little bit of integration, a little bit of making yourself a part of your community and world to make a difference.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

18 Nov 2015, 11:09 am

What I get out of the whole "nice guy" thing is that feminists still want to date the people they already find most attractive not the ones that simply appeases and there is limited overlap between these two groups thus a lot of frustrated guys. The reality is that we live in an unequal society, they oppose a "commodity based model of sex" but that is the nature of world so it makes as much sense as opposing as the nature of homosexuals. A "performance model" like playing music or dancing together is just kind of silly unrealistic dogma that will forever make them unhappy and unfulfilled. The advice that you should find a hobby is just another way of saying you need to develop a social network to be considered attractive which is in itself a commodity. Any advice you could give a person would back that commodity model, any improvement in yourself at all.



LeelaLeela
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Age: 945
Posts: 27

18 Nov 2015, 11:37 am

Jacoby wrote:
What I get out of the whole "nice guy" thing is that feminists still want to date the people they already find most attractive not the ones that simply appeases and there is limited overlap between these two groups thus a lot of frustrated guys. The reality is that we live in an unequal society, they oppose a "commodity based model of sex" but that is the nature of world so it makes as much sense as opposing as the nature of homosexuals. A "performance model" like playing music or dancing together is just kind of silly unrealistic dogma that will forever make them unhappy and unfulfilled. The advice that you should find a hobby is just another way of saying you need to develop a social network to be considered attractive which is in itself a commodity. Any advice you could give a person would back that commodity model, any improvement in yourself at all.


Feminists want equality. The criteria by which an individual woman chooses to date (or not date) an individual man varies from individual woman to individual woman (and individual man to individual man).

You just sound pissed and aggrieved that to date no individual woman has been willing to date you ... also unrelated to feminism in any way, shape or form.

If you want a relationship and haven't found one through your existing social network or online, getting a hobby to expand your social network and perhaps find a relationship through the power of "weak ties" (a la Malcolm Gladwell) seems like a pretty solid strategy. And, yes, it involves being smart/funny/interesting/whatever enough that someone likes you enough to want to spend time with you and maybe date you. It's not like you're entitled to a relationship for existing nor is it enough to tick boxes (hygienic, stylish, employed) and expect that to magically throw girls at your feet!



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,991
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

18 Nov 2015, 11:53 am

LeelaLeela wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
What I get out of the whole "nice guy" thing is that feminists still want to date the people they already find most attractive not the ones that simply appeases and there is limited overlap between these two groups thus a lot of frustrated guys. The reality is that we live in an unequal society, they oppose a "commodity based model of sex" but that is the nature of world so it makes as much sense as opposing as the nature of homosexuals. A "performance model" like playing music or dancing together is just kind of silly unrealistic dogma that will forever make them unhappy and unfulfilled. The advice that you should find a hobby is just another way of saying you need to develop a social network to be considered attractive which is in itself a commodity. Any advice you could give a person would back that commodity model, any improvement in yourself at all.


Feminists want equality. The criteria by which an individual woman chooses to date (or not date) an individual man varies from individual woman to individual woman (and individual man to individual man).

You just sound pissed and aggrieved that to date no individual woman has been willing to date you ... also unrelated to feminism in any way, shape or form.

If you want a relationship and haven't found one through your existing social network or online, getting a hobby to expand your social network and perhaps find a relationship through the power of "weak ties" (a la Malcolm Gladwell) seems like a pretty solid strategy. And, yes, it involves being smart/funny/interesting/whatever enough that someone likes you enough to want to spend time with you and maybe date you. It's not like you're entitled to a relationship for existing nor is it enough to tick boxes (hygienic, stylish, employed) and expect that to magically throw girls at your feet!


It seems a lot of feminists just want all the rights for themselves....I mean I have heard outright hate of the male sex coming from feminists as if they think the world would do better if women were the only sex. I think feminism just allows the breeding ground for that kind of extremist thinking anymore....especially given that women do have equal rights. Why not actually look at the big picture and improve issues that face both males and females rather than trying to twist everything into being specifically designed to 'keep women down'...feminism has become stagnant.

And who the hell said anything about expecting girls to magically be thrown at their feet, appears you are also putting words in peoples mouths.....is that what they teach you at feminism university?

And having sex is nothing like playing music with people or other typical social activities...so expecting people to see it that way is ridiculous.


_________________
We won't go back.


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

18 Nov 2015, 2:14 pm

Aaendi wrote:
marshall wrote:
My problem with the feminists attacking "nice guys" is that it's transparent bullying and hypocrisy. They like to claim they are only attacking guys who are really NOT nice guys, not simply any guy who has ever expressed frustration. The problem is the way they word things they clearly are attacking the latter. According to their logic any complaining over feeling left out in the cold in terms of finding love or intimacy is evidence of "entitlement" (based on their bizarre definition) and misogyny. I've never been able to follow their reasoning.

Because their attack hits so broadly it seems transparent that they're just swinging at low hanging fruit. Instead of attacking those who really are as*holes, they attack those lowest on the social totem pole. They do it because it feels good to attack where they know they can actually inflict pain. No damn is given whether the target is the one actually deserving the attack. It's like if I decided to go and kick the dog because I was mad at an abusive relative. And they call themselves "social justice warriors". It's also highly offensive that they merely assume the "nice guy" always wants their body and nothing more.


What I find the most irritating is that being "nice" or "mean" are both wrong to them.
nice = submissive, desperate, unassertive, no confidence
mean = bitter, misogynist, woman hater, rapist


I don't think any women like guys who are transparently bitter. But there do exist those who get the hots for the abusive narcissist (like the guy from 50 shades of gray). I suppose this is analogous to guys being attracted to and dating beautiful looking woman with a horrible personality. Feeling this attraction isn't so much the problem (its a biological thing that people don't have control over) as is calling it "love". It seems people confuse love with shallow infatuation. I think the real problem is we live in an age of selfishness and instant gratification, and contrary to feminist belief it isn't just affecting males.



Aaendi
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 363

18 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm

Feminists don't understand there's a difference between saying no to sex and moving on, and going out of their way to destroy a man's reputation through slander and gossip. Every time a man ever asks them out on a date, they have to go whining about it on their blogs.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

18 Nov 2015, 7:03 pm

LeelaLeela wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
What I get out of the whole "nice guy" thing is that feminists still want to date the people they already find most attractive not the ones that simply appeases and there is limited overlap between these two groups thus a lot of frustrated guys. The reality is that we live in an unequal society, they oppose a "commodity based model of sex" but that is the nature of world so it makes as much sense as opposing as the nature of homosexuals. A "performance model" like playing music or dancing together is just kind of silly unrealistic dogma that will forever make them unhappy and unfulfilled. The advice that you should find a hobby is just another way of saying you need to develop a social network to be considered attractive which is in itself a commodity. Any advice you could give a person would back that commodity model, any improvement in yourself at all.


Feminists want equality. The criteria by which an individual woman chooses to date (or not date) an individual man varies from individual woman to individual woman (and individual man to individual man).

You just sound pissed and aggrieved that to date no individual woman has been willing to date you ... also unrelated to feminism in any way, shape or form.

If you want a relationship and haven't found one through your existing social network or online, getting a hobby to expand your social network and perhaps find a relationship through the power of "weak ties" (a la Malcolm Gladwell) seems like a pretty solid strategy. And, yes, it involves being smart/funny/interesting/whatever enough that someone likes you enough to want to spend time with you and maybe date you. It's not like you're entitled to a relationship for existing nor is it enough to tick boxes (hygienic, stylish, employed) and expect that to magically throw girls at your feet!

Well Katy, Feminism is a meaningless term on its own since it can be warped to mean whatever you want, this third wave cultural critique pretends like women have no hand in shaping our society or culture and that it's all 'the patriarchy' and rape culture. They deny any aspect of female power or privilege, if you can't look in the mirror then how can you expect other people? Female culture isn't any less toxic then men, they've played a huge role throughout history in shaping our society no matter how much feminists want to scream persecution and wash their hands of all the awful things they were part of as well. You gals remind me Marie St Clare from Uncle Tom's Cabin.

These self proclaimed feminists don't live by their own rules yet expect everyone else too, they're very anti-female in my opinion from the prospective that they think you are all powerless helpless babies that need to appeased. It's not entitlement, you yourself are giving me advice to improve myself as a "commodity" to you so if you can't keep that consistent then maybe you need to rethink the whole idea. It's more a recognition of fact, most women are shallow and most guys are as well. It's not as if what I said isn't true, it doesn't matter for the token person to raise their hand up and say "well I'm not like that", that's not an answer feminists will accept from men whenever they raise an issue. Women are the most powerful when it comes to policing other women, it's up to you to change yourselves in order to change the culture. That's great you freed women of all gender obligations, so what about guys? What about female privilege? Are you willing to give that power up? Are you even willing to admit it exists? It doesn't seem like a lot of feminists really want equality but rather special treatment and protection, they can't admit any faults of their own.



wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

18 Nov 2015, 7:25 pm

So much bitterness in this thread.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

18 Nov 2015, 8:11 pm

Have you ever met a man whom you've found DECENT?

I would love to read that sort of anecdote from you.

Yes, there are decent guys out there who do not feel entitled, do not believe in the Patriarchy, and believe women are their partners rather than their trophies.



wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

18 Nov 2015, 9:28 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Have you ever met a man whom you've found DECENT?

I would love to read that sort of anecdote from you.

Yes, there are decent guys out there who do not feel entitled, do not believe in the Patriarchy, and believe women are their partners rather than their trophies.


Of course I have--mostly in high school and college (like many people, I think, that's where I naturally accrued the most acquaintances and friends). I've had good friends throughout the years that were guys--in fact, when it comes to friendships I often find it easier to establish relationships with people when they are male. If I end up making girl friends it's usually because they initiate the friendship because they've sort of decided to take me under their wing (like the mother hen dynamic, to coach me on how to be better at being a girl)--and many of those didn't end well when I didn't take to their coaching because I'm apparently not all that good at being a girl and that's hard for some women to deal with or understand. Some of my favourite people (and my current favourite person) have been guys. I often find them easier to relate to in a platonic way than other women.



LeelaLeela
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Age: 945
Posts: 27

18 Nov 2015, 9:57 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Have you ever met a man whom you've found DECENT?

I would love to read that sort of anecdote from you.

Yes, there are decent guys out there who do not feel entitled, do not believe in the Patriarchy, and believe women are their partners rather than their trophies.


Tons. Few on this board, plenty in real life. Boyfriend I'm quite fond of, three of my closest friend are men I've known forever.

I don't see men as trophies, don't date guys who see girls as trophies.

I certainly don't hang out with men who rant that the supposedly evil feminists stole their jobs/dignity/whatever's! Because they didn't!



Unfortunate_Aspie_
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Sep 2015
Age: 33
Posts: 579
Location: On the Edge of...

18 Nov 2015, 11:07 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
LeelaLeela wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
What I get out of the whole "nice guy" thing is that feminists still want to date the people they already find most attractive not the ones that simply appeases and there is limited overlap between these two groups thus a lot of frustrated guys. The reality is that we live in an unequal society, they oppose a "commodity based model of sex" but that is the nature of world so it makes as much sense as opposing as the nature of homosexuals. A "performance model" like playing music or dancing together is just kind of silly unrealistic dogma that will forever make them unhappy and unfulfilled. The advice that you should find a hobby is just another way of saying you need to develop a social network to be considered attractive which is in itself a commodity. Any advice you could give a person would back that commodity model, any improvement in yourself at all.


Feminists want equality. The criteria by which an individual woman chooses to date (or not date) an individual man varies from individual woman to individual woman (and individual man to individual man).

You just sound pissed and aggrieved that to date no individual woman has been willing to date you ... also unrelated to feminism in any way, shape or form.

If you want a relationship and haven't found one through your existing social network or online, getting a hobby to expand your social network and perhaps find a relationship through the power of "weak ties" (a la Malcolm Gladwell) seems like a pretty solid strategy. And, yes, it involves being smart/funny/interesting/whatever enough that someone likes you enough to want to spend time with you and maybe date you. It's not like you're entitled to a relationship for existing nor is it enough to tick boxes (hygienic, stylish, employed) and expect that to magically throw girls at your feet!


It seems a lot of feminists just want all the rights for themselves....I mean I have heard outright hate of the male sex coming from feminists as if they think the world would do better if women were the only sex. I think feminism just allows the breeding ground for that kind of extremist thinking anymore....especially given that women do have equal rights. Why not actually look at the big picture and improve issues that face both males and females rather than trying to twist everything into being specifically designed to 'keep women down'...feminism has become stagnant.

And who the hell said anything about expecting girls to magically be thrown at their feet, appears you are also putting words in peoples mouths.....is that what they teach you at feminism university?

And having sex is nothing like playing music with people or other typical social activities...so expecting people to see it that way is ridiculous.

I'm feminist and I don't think this. Who are these damn feminists that people keep talking about but I never encounter?
Honestly, if you aren't for EQUAL RIGHTS (e.g: men can vote women can vote because their opinions are equally as important in a functioning society, men can work and women can work and they should be paid exactly the same amount if they have the same job descriptions and put in the same hours with the same results. If a woman has a better rating or score in her apprails or reviews for work but gets paid significantly less than all her male peers, that's BS etc.etc. Women shouldn't have to face stigma or sexual harassment for wanting to do STEM field things etc.)
if you aren't for the equal rights of all genders then you're sexist plain and simple. It's not a hard concept.
And these so-called feminists AREN'T f*****g FEMINIST if they are not for equal rights, they are simply being inflammatory.
Also, you're very wrong in saying women and men are equal, especially in the workplace. The glass-ceiling in management is very much alive. I've seen enough evaluations and pay rolls when I have to file or prepare documents... to know for a fact that women that work for years or decades get paid 10s of thousands of dollars less (because status quo) then their male counter parts for a job that they were just rated as doing better.
With little raises and much less pay for better work.
Have you ever been at a meeting where women are literally completely bipassed and ignored along with their ideas until the SAME EXACT WORDS come out of a male-mouth and suddenly everyone is all ears.
I mean verbatim the SAME plan or words. The only difference being gender.
Or for example, the same exact resume sent to employers with the ONLY difference being the gendered name of the candidate and the call-back rate being significantly less for female applicants or starting salary. :?:



Unfortunate_Aspie_
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Sep 2015
Age: 33
Posts: 579
Location: On the Edge of...

18 Nov 2015, 11:20 pm

Outrider wrote:
LeelaLeela:

What about the guy who is doing all the right things to be as physically and mentally attractive as possible, but is still failing and is simply venting his frustrations (which is healthy as not only do human beings feel these emotions but it's better than bottling it up).

Imho:

Entitled = I deserve women no matter what.

Not entitled = I'm doing all the right things, but still not seeing any results. It's not women's fault, and I'm not angry at those that are considered 'less attractive' by social/cultural standards, but just frustrated.

Thing is, it takes time, dedication, effort and money not just in relationships, but life in general. And if you use all these things in your life and still find no results, it's natural to feel frustrated.

Compare getting a relationship to getting a job.

Entitled = I deserve a job no matter what. Even if I don't have the right qualification I am an extremely friendly person so the job should be mine.

Not entitled = I work hard, I have the correct degree, I have the necessary skills required for the job, I'm extremely friendly and easy to work with, I respect authority, etc. yet I still don't have the job. I've applied to many, many places in my field and yet it's been two years.

People have every right to feel angry or frustrated over lack of success sometimes.

So, a successful social life is earned by being a nice, good and interesting, positive person? Well, some of us are all of those things, yet we still have a tiny number of friends while a large number of 'a55høles' congregate together and are all magnetized to each other.

My ex-girlfriend is a wonderful example. She was extremely selfish, over-dramatic, would always take things the wrong way, extremely aggressive, and overall an absolutely hateable person. Yet me, a caring, kind, compassionate guy she was the best I could do, and yet she manages to get a new boyfriend/relationship (a 21 year old in fact) 3 DAYS after we broke up.

Should I really never ever feel annoyed bullsh*t like this happens in the world? Do I feel entitled to a woman/happy relationship? No, not at all. But when any old deadbeat criminal thief hobo redneck bogan grubby drug-addict G.I. skinny man can go through dozens of good relationships while even the most attractive of aspies can't, then there's clearly a problem here.

Maybe it's just 'life is unfair'. Though the world doesn't become more fair if we just ignore the issue and continue to live a life being treated unfairly. Life is unfair, sure, but whoeever said we can't MAKE it fair? And how do we do that?

By consistently deciding to be polite, helpful, kind, selfess, considerate, compassionate people in this world that tolerate and care for others.

I completely agree with Marshall on this one. Life's unfair and that sucks, and it's the reason why some people are so happy through no effort while other people who really are trying are so miserable.

Instead of criticizing people who complain life is unfair and basically telling them to shut up, why don't we give them some constructive criticism - by asking them 'Life's unfair, but what are YOU going to DO about it?'

Once more people learn to do this, perhaps the world would be a much better place.


One caveat I would say would be that a relationship isn't a goal or your job it isn't something you "accomplish" it is a mutual undertaking between two individuals who can hopefully learn and grow together. So, basically I don't think they are comparable. *end cheesy rant*

And, it IS a shame that AS peeps have a hell of a time (myself included) getting into relationships, but it's a part of the larger picture in that AS is considered a disability/disorder/sickness/whatever for a reason.
I don't agree with this, but it is and it does make things a lot harder. :(
I'm not sure what else there is to say about it really- like there aren't many solutions other than to keep on tryin'.
I mean what else can a person possibly do? Nothing IMHO.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

18 Nov 2015, 11:39 pm

LeelaLeela wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Have you ever met a man whom you've found DECENT?

I would love to read that sort of anecdote from you.

Yes, there are decent guys out there who do not feel entitled, do not believe in the Patriarchy, and believe women are their partners rather than their trophies.


Tons. Few on this board, plenty in real life. Boyfriend I'm quite fond of, three of my closest friend are men I've known forever.

Why don't you go to a forum with actual misogynists and b***h about them instead of trolling autistic people. Here you go...

http://www.rooshv.com/

Quote:
I don't see men as trophies, don't date guys who see girls as trophies.

:roll: The vast majority of men who post here don't see girls as trophies and don't believe they are entitled to have a sex-slave wife.

Quote:
I certainly don't hang out with men who rant that the supposedly evil feminists stole their jobs/dignity/whatever's! Because they didn't!

Nice straw man. Nobody here is arguing that. Only that a lot of modern feminists behave obnoxiously on their blogs. Again, why don't you go here...

http://www.rooshv.com/

Oh yea... Because you can't insult them for being sexually frustrated. They seem to get sex (or at least claim to) despite being vile disgusting people. It's better to attack frustrated autistic people because at least you can make them bleed.



LeelaLeela
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Age: 945
Posts: 27

19 Nov 2015, 1:43 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Katy is the kind of person who closes her ears so hard and sings "LA LA LA LA I DON'T HEAR YOU".

She feels so entitled to her 'right' of bitchy behavior :p.


I don't think my behavior's bitchy but, hey, "she's not a people person" (and I'm soooo not, kind of inevitable if you're an Aspie) is something I used to get told all.the.time as a kid!



Nocturnus
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2015
Posts: 354
Location: England

19 Nov 2015, 1:57 am

LeelaLeela wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Katy is the kind of person who closes her ears so hard and sings "LA LA LA LA I DON'T HEAR YOU".

She feels so entitled to her 'right' of bitchy behavior :p.


I don't think my behavior's bitchy but, hey, "she's not a people person" (and I'm soooo not, kind of inevitable if you're an Aspie) is something I used to get told all.the.time as a kid!


Now now, dear, don't get all flustered.