kraftiekortie wrote:
You know....there really isn't such thing as a "neurotypical."
The term "neurotypical" is used, frequently, merely as a indicator that a person is not autistic, and has "typical" neurology, in general.
Thank you for this clarification. I have trouble using the word, since it seems inaccurate to me. I will not attempt to police anyone else's use of the language but I think I'll continue to use other terms to refer to non-autistic people.
And now the on topic reply:
The main thing I have noticed with most people is that they tend to be more focused on form and/or emotional impact than on content, and they tend to put accuracy and clarity at a lower priority than I do. Also, many people seem to use language and emotional expression to manipulate or get their way, something I struggle to keep in mind when dealing with them. I tend to appear stilted, pedantic, arrogant, or even inappropriately emotional, plus I focus way more on content than form or intent (what is literally said rather than what effect it might be intended to have).
The dumbest thing I have done through most of my life is to unthinkingly assume that everyone approaches conversation like I do, in spite of years of experience which should have taught me that this is actually uncommon outside of structured contexts such as work, school, or other institutions, or interest-based clubs. This tendency runs so deep that I have to literally say to myself (inside voice) "careful here, this person doesn't think like you do" if I want to get it right.