West vs East : Relationship and family values.
Good thread Boo.
I am just in the middle of my first real friendship with an Eastern female so am coming accross these differences in conversations. I saw nothing you wrote that didn't match what I have observed so far.
I am thinking on the subject now and might have something to add, but for the moment just one observation comes to mind. You touch on it lightly when you say men anywhere would probably like sex when they can get it.
What I see (but admittedly with only a limited view) is distinct double standard when it comes to men and women and sexual activity in the East. It seems to be generally accepted that men can have premarital sex with whomever they can find. Women on the other hand are kept to a much stricter standard and are expected to be virgins at marriage. To make up for the mutually opposite systems, Eastern men seem to treat Eastern women as one thing, but any foreign, particularly western women as another and fair game for advances. Also, when eastern men are in the west they often persue activities prohibited at home, such as porn, strip clubs, etc.
My initial conclusion is that Eastern and Western men are pretty identical in nature and only conform to societal norms for the sake of fitting in/working within the structure they were handed at birth.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,045
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
^ This is all.... true.
Stud/slut double standard exists almost everywhere but it gets amplified the more the culture is reserved and macho, and it's no secret that Eastern cultures are more macho than the West.
I re-recite an incident I talked about here: Back in the university, my clique of friends tried to drag me to go with them to a known brothel (brothels and massage parlors are common where I live); they all had gfs and I was like "but you have gfs" - they laughed.
Obviously they weren't having sex with their gfs.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,045
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Most young people stay with their families until their mid-20's, at least. This is especially so if the young person goes to University/college. The trend, definitely, is for young people to stay living with their parents longer owing to economic conditions.
This surprised me a little because as RetroGamer87 pointed, the stigma of living with parents seems to be still there in the West despite this is happening a lot nowadays?
Because really, I have seen female members here saying how they don't like guys living with parents and how is considered an unattractive attribute.
So as a foreign observant, I thought that moving out at young age it is still a standard in the West.
In the East, moving out happens only if:
- Marriage.
-The child is studying in a college away from parent's home, but once finished he/she returns to home; and expected to return on weekends if not so far.
- If he/she is working abroad.
In fact....there's an opposite stigma here, if a guy is living alone then he's often thought he did something really shameful to get expelled from family.
Yes, the moving age has changed in the USA at least. I think it was mostly financially driven. Actual wages buying power has deteriorated slowly but surely over some 3 decades. So kids are less able to afford a place of their own at starting wages. Also, better paying jobs have been more difficult to get, for 1 1/2 decades (outsourcing and recession).
But your right in that the negative stigma of 'still living at home' has persisted longer.
The average marrying age has drifted older and older too. Like my parents generation married around age 20, my gen around 25 and this gen closer to 30.
If I had a decent job when I was living at home a lot more of my income could have gone to saving. I'll bet someone with a decent job could save for a downpayment in only a few years if they were living at home. Some of the youths I know buy a house, rent it out and say they won't move into it until after they get married.
This means their tenants pay their mortgage for them while they use their spare cash to build their stock portfolio. If only I was younger and living at home I could get rich from negative gearing.
$75 per month? Even accounting for inflation that's only $276 per month in today's dollars. Now it's so much more. How did the rent get so high? How did real estate prices get so high? Nowadays inner suburban family homes are worth literally millions of dollars. Who could pay for that while raising a family?
Meanwhile, getting back to the East vs West comparison, here's a family home in Hong Kong that rents for about $2,000 USD per month.
I think you can blame the American sub prime rate loan housing bubble for an increase in housing costs throughout the western world. Another reason is population increase, for which housing has not scaled proportionally.
In the city I am in, there is no space to expand, so to increase housing, one structure must be torn down, and a taller one must be built, and they also must build underground parking. That's all very costly, so developers have no choice but to charge high rents. Additionally, a lot of people want to live here. So it comes down to supply and demand. Short supply + high demand = high prices.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,060
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Most young people stay with their families until their mid-20's, at least. This is especially so if the young person goes to University/college. The trend, definitely, is for young people to stay living with their parents longer owing to economic conditions.
I've noticed the stigma comes mostly from older people. Middle aged or older. I've had old men call me basement dwellers. I overheard a middle aged lady at work express a similar sentiment. She moved out of home at 18 but that was in a different time.
The trouble with a lot of people is they think of young people in terms of how things were when they were young. The stigma remains because middle aged people may have been able to move out very cheaply when they were young. Nowadays young people have a hard time affording to move out. So older people judge them by the standards of when they were young. They forget that things were much cheaper in their time.
50 years ago college tuition was cheaper. You could work your way through college. Nowadays it's impossible without student loans or outside help.
I've seen people middle aged or older say that young people nowadays are too soft. In some ways they are but not when it comes to money. Young people face much greater financial challenges nowadays. Everything is more expensive. Housing, education, even getting married costs more than it used to.
I've seen old people chastise young people and boast that they were financially self-supporting in their teens but nowadays it's less practical to support yourself using unskilled labour. 50 years ago an unskilled labourer could earn enough for himself, his non-working homemaker wife and his four kids to live in comfort, while paying off a mortgage. I know because that's precisely what my grandfather did in the 60s while working as a janitor.
Nowadays unskilled labour is not a financially viable option if you want to live independently. You must learn some sort of skill and that means going to college. Not only does it mean you have to put yourself in tens of thousands of dollars of debt before you enter your career but it also means 4 or 5 years of not working full time, the the 4 or 5 years of study is 4 or 5 years in which you have to live without earning a significant amount.
Also to raise a family and/or buy a house, means not only having a skilled job but your wife must have a skilled job as well. Gone are the days of the nuclear family. The next generation may spend more time in daycare/after school care than with either of their parents (this is bad news for introverted kids) and the next generation may be raised by middle aged parents who have a lengthy checklist of stuff they have to do before they have kids (get promoted, buy overpriced house, etc).
So older people shouldn't be so hard on twenty-agers. Older people don't worry about the cost of housing when they've already paid off their mortgage. Instead they congratulate themselves for living in a house that's quadrupled in value in the last 30 years.
Some old people don't realize that if their house has quadrupled in value that young people hoping to buy a similar house will have to pay four times as much. Did it never occur to them that their fortune could be someone else's misfortune?
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
_________________
"Embrace the glorious mess that you are."
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,060
Location: Adelaide, Australia
On the bright side it inspired me to spend most of Sunday studying for my ISTQB exam. To my dismay I wasn't able to study effectively until 2AM. I couldn't concentrate after 7PM and I had to go to bed at 10:30PM.
I'm a morning person. I'm like a zombie in the evening. I think that girl must be both a morning person and an evening person. How I envy her.
Wait... Drawyer, something tells me you have first hand experience of that.
I got it. You're Korean. You actually lived through that.
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
^ Since being a person who knows only three countries of NorthEast Asia, and one of them happens to be SouthKorea (No, my knowledge is stuff I've never trusted tho..) I wish you wouldn't mind if I replied on behalf of Drawyer . However, I think I need time to verify qualification to answer after some research. So..Wait.
_________________
I'll stay gay toward you ♥-♥
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,060
Location: Adelaide, Australia
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,060
Location: Adelaide, Australia
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,045
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Another difference I notice between West and East is the traditional marketplaces.
Western traditional markets are usually kiosks or kiosk-like tents, side by side and one after another, displaying the products on the sites of the window or at the sides of the kiosk's door, it's more indoory.
Middle Eastern souks and Asian marketplaces are more chaotic and open-air marketplaces, traditional Asian marketplaces are very similar to Arab traditional souks in the way of displaying products.
Philippine:
China:
Dubai:
Actually, Rome has a very similar-looking indoor marketplace to the one whose picture you posted. And I would call it pretty "chaotic." The similarities are striking, actually.
In New York, in Chinatown, it's very similar as well. People bump into each other without regard for other people. I work in Chinatown; I would never shop there until after 5. I believe it's taken for granted that it will be crowded, and that people will be bumped.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,045
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Arab and Muslim Americans and Trump's Middle East policies |
10 Nov 2024, 10:12 pm |
Mass shooting at NYC West Indian Day Parade |
03 Sep 2024, 10:11 am |
Kanye West claims car accident caused autism |
20 Oct 2024, 8:04 am |
What's your relationship style? |
09 Nov 2024, 6:48 am |