GiantHockeyFan wrote:
Might as well get used to this if you are planning on trying it because this is common. I had one girl contact me, we send a hundred messages back and forth and every single time I mentioned meeting she would either make an excuse or ignore that message and eventually flaked. She then contacted me AGAIN a month or so later like nothing happened and after about 50 more messages she mentioned she was at a local mall I said "great! I will be there in about an hour." Never heard from her again.
You should enforce time limits on messaging before meeting. (Just don't say that verbatim!) It's not 1998 anymore. There is no benefit in talking for weeks and weeks before meeting a "stranger off the internet". Meeting quickly is the norm nowadays. After all, people have short attention spans and want instant gratification. So after a few conversations to screen the other person out, it's best to just meet and see if you have "chemistry". Which is actually code for "is he alpha or beta?", but I'm going off topic here.
I myself have a 10-day limit when it comes to meeting women of dating sites. If she's not sitting in front of me at a coffee shop within 10 days of the first message, then it'll probably never happen. It's not a hard-and-fast limit. I extend it to up for 2 weeks if the woman really intrigues me and/or has a
legitimately busy schedule. But absolutely no more. Also, words "schedule" and "busy" are themselves codes for "he's too beta!", so the extensions are something I do as a courtesy on a case-by-case basis.
While it's not a perfect method, I never had it fail me. Women who wanted to "talk for longer" or "get to know me more" always made up dumb excuses for not meeting in person.