19 Jan 2017, 4:28 pm
19 Jan 2017, 4:31 pm
19 Jan 2017, 4:33 pm
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,106
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
19 Jan 2017, 4:34 pm
19 Jan 2017, 4:36 pm
19 Jan 2017, 4:37 pm
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,106
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
19 Jan 2017, 4:42 pm
Go go go!
19 Jan 2017, 5:26 pm
Ban-Dodger wrote:
Experienced women will be able to pick up on no-standard men.
The nurse explains it pretty accurately but not all women are the same,
for there are indeed women out there who are themselves what would be called players,
just like there are guys who are clear and obviously brazen womanisers.
The womanisers are able to get into the panties of so many women because,
well, how shall I put this, I guess we could reverse the gender in your thread-title:
«Can Men Detect a Girl With No Standards» ?
Why? Well, a successful womaniser does not criticise a lady for wanting pleasure (such as calling her a slut),
and an experienced womaniser knows exactly how to give said lady the pleasures she desires.
Also, I need to point out, all so-called relationships are actually «karmic» in nature.
On, average, I suspect that most of spectrum-population will have less sex-partners in a life-time,
whereas a greater percentage of NTs will likely have had more sex-partners on average.
This has less to do with the psychological-wiring, I believe, and more to do with the fact that,
the NT typically has much more social-interaction and thus more opportunities for encountering bed-partners.
The nurse explains it pretty accurately but not all women are the same,
for there are indeed women out there who are themselves what would be called players,
just like there are guys who are clear and obviously brazen womanisers.
The womanisers are able to get into the panties of so many women because,
well, how shall I put this, I guess we could reverse the gender in your thread-title:
«Can Men Detect a Girl With No Standards» ?
Why? Well, a successful womaniser does not criticise a lady for wanting pleasure (such as calling her a slut),
and an experienced womaniser knows exactly how to give said lady the pleasures she desires.
Also, I need to point out, all so-called relationships are actually «karmic» in nature.
On, average, I suspect that most of spectrum-population will have less sex-partners in a life-time,
whereas a greater percentage of NTs will likely have had more sex-partners on average.
This has less to do with the psychological-wiring, I believe, and more to do with the fact that,
the NT typically has much more social-interaction and thus more opportunities for encountering bed-partners.
You hit it on the nail with the some women having no standards. And you're another one who proves my point that men think women are "sluts" if they have several partners. I have to say that most of you Aspies get around a lot more than I do because most of y'all have had way more sexual partners. You give NT's way to much credit. Do you realize that when Mr. Time Warner guy came to fix my internet, he figured out that I was antisocial. It was embarrassing. Honestly. So there are some (probably more than you think) of hermit NT's. It's either that, or I'm an Aspie.
19 Jan 2017, 5:29 pm
TheSpectrum wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
I have always been told tbat a guy who really likes you will be a bit nervous.
It's when guys are too complimentive like "you're awesome" "I love your eye" "your so smart" constantly rather than wanting to find out more about you. I don't mean like the odd "your beautiful" or a compliment in context I mean like a constant stream of random conpliments they probably don't even mean.
A man who is actually interested wants to know more about you and dive deeper.
The thing that really matters aswell is if they are listening to your responses or just pretending because they think that's what you want.
I kind of rambled sorry about that
It's when guys are too complimentive like "you're awesome" "I love your eye" "your so smart" constantly rather than wanting to find out more about you. I don't mean like the odd "your beautiful" or a compliment in context I mean like a constant stream of random conpliments they probably don't even mean.
A man who is actually interested wants to know more about you and dive deeper.
The thing that really matters aswell is if they are listening to your responses or just pretending because they think that's what you want.
I kind of rambled sorry about that
No you're alright. Good to hear an honest answer.
Who's the bozo only complimenting one of your eyes? Do you wear an eye patch??
Hmm I do get nervous around the girls I like. My language even gets sheepish and I end up using a very limited vocabulary. It can be overwhelming but at the same time, do women really want that? It's no surprise they'd reject this in favour of what is seemingly perfect.
You crack me up, Mr. S., with the "one eye" thing! She just made a boo boo in spelliing.
Yes, I would rather have you nervous. People who are too sure of themselves annoy me at times.
19 Jan 2017, 5:33 pm
Ban-Dodger
Veteran
Joined: 2 Jun 2011
Age: 1027
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,820
Location: Возможно в будущее к Россию идти... можеть быть...
19 Jan 2017, 6:06 pm
19 Jan 2017, 6:13 pm
Ban-Dodger wrote:
I think you're mis-interpreting something that I wrote, for I do not regard any women as a so-called slut, for all ladies are the most precious and beautiful daughters of God. Even the very Messiah has written about it!
Also, you seem to be one of the «exceptions» amongst so-called NTs, that you do not socialise a lot.
Language evolves, social-structures change, and categories/labels, I believe, need to be abandoned.
Why? Too much division. It's like political-labels that result in these sports-team mentalities. Absurd.
I don't want to hear about how «That guy must be a Packers fan» or «That guy must be a Vikings fan» or «That guy must be a Steelers fan» or «That guy must be a Seahawks fan» or «That guy must be a Trump-supporter» or «That guy must be a liberal» or «That guy must be a right-wing nut-case» or «That guy must be an NT» or «That guy must be autistic» or «That guy must be a conspiracy nut» or that guy this or that guy that... understand?
Anyway, feminism is bad, political-factions are bad, criticizing others for their «peaceful» ways or desires is bad.
I need to repeat this, I need to repeat this, and I need to repeat this, and it's that «sex» is NOT a so-called sin.
Religions have taught so much falsity about sex for 2000+ years that it's required the Messiah's return...
Note: I am fully aware that some people will have this automatic knee-jerk-reaction about me having some sort of mental-illness for talking about how The Messiah (yes, THE Messiah) has already returned, such as those prosecutors and that judge who tried to force me into a psychological-evaluation for making mention of The Messiah, when it is actually they (and most policemen in the world) who are mentally ill, for no «sane» people would engage in daily acts of extortion (bail-bonds), kidnapping (arrests), hostage-taking (jailing), perjury (violating Oaths of Office), operating under colour of law (i.e.: wearing costumes/uniforms to commit acts of violating human/natural/civil-rights), domestic-terrorism, threats, frauds, concealment-of-frauds, etc. I'M the «sane» one! I am not the one going about causing pain/harm/suffering/trauma/injury to any person or property for I live my life peacefully.
P.S.: I still need to move to Kansas. Help me move to Kansas one of these days by the way. I can even sell you a whole bunch of very rare medical-books for a huge discount! One of those extremely rare medical-books even sold for $999 to a customer at a Maryland hospital a couple of years ago! Otherwise we could do trades or something. O_O
nurseangela wrote:
And you're another one who proves my point that men think women are "sluts" if they have several partners. I have to say that most of you Aspies get around a lot more than I do because most of y'all have had way more sexual partners. You give NT's way to much credit. Do you realize that when Mr. Time Warner guy came to fix my internet, he figured out that I was antisocial. It was embarrassing. Honestly.
Also, you seem to be one of the «exceptions» amongst so-called NTs, that you do not socialise a lot.
Language evolves, social-structures change, and categories/labels, I believe, need to be abandoned.
Why? Too much division. It's like political-labels that result in these sports-team mentalities. Absurd.
I don't want to hear about how «That guy must be a Packers fan» or «That guy must be a Vikings fan» or «That guy must be a Steelers fan» or «That guy must be a Seahawks fan» or «That guy must be a Trump-supporter» or «That guy must be a liberal» or «That guy must be a right-wing nut-case» or «That guy must be an NT» or «That guy must be autistic» or «That guy must be a conspiracy nut» or that guy this or that guy that... understand?
Anyway, feminism is bad, political-factions are bad, criticizing others for their «peaceful» ways or desires is bad.
I need to repeat this, I need to repeat this, and I need to repeat this, and it's that «sex» is NOT a so-called sin.
Religions have taught so much falsity about sex for 2000+ years that it's required the Messiah's return...
The Messiah's Other Letters wrote:
Further notes to all readers and 'Chris' - Subsequent to writing my "letter to Chris" above on page 101, I did attend a talk he gave. He spoke about his life, past, present, and his wife and he also offered to 'heal' any person present.
It was quite clear to me that Chris as yet is "lost in the dark" and cannot see clearly. For he 'presents' his life as promoting himself as a 'saved one' for the purpose of deceiving others in more than one way, and of this fact he is as oblivious as were the other attendees.
He also casts a 'slur' upon many a young 'maiden' from his past that he names 'loose women' that gave him 'love' when it was he the 'loose' cannonball. Grow up Chris, 'sex' and closeness is not a 'sin' son, and your true 'ministry' for God has not yet begun.
For you as yet do 'walk and talk' for the Dark one as you speak many a 'lie,' as you try to get others to believe that you can heal them and save them as you place yourself above them and equal to God.
http://www.the-testament-of-truth.co.uk ... m#page_101
(Note: The full letter to Chris is at the link above which consists of many more dozens of sentences/paragraphs)
It was quite clear to me that Chris as yet is "lost in the dark" and cannot see clearly. For he 'presents' his life as promoting himself as a 'saved one' for the purpose of deceiving others in more than one way, and of this fact he is as oblivious as were the other attendees.
He also casts a 'slur' upon many a young 'maiden' from his past that he names 'loose women' that gave him 'love' when it was he the 'loose' cannonball. Grow up Chris, 'sex' and closeness is not a 'sin' son, and your true 'ministry' for God has not yet begun.
For you as yet do 'walk and talk' for the Dark one as you speak many a 'lie,' as you try to get others to believe that you can heal them and save them as you place yourself above them and equal to God.
http://www.the-testament-of-truth.co.uk ... m#page_101
(Note: The full letter to Chris is at the link above which consists of many more dozens of sentences/paragraphs)
Note: I am fully aware that some people will have this automatic knee-jerk-reaction about me having some sort of mental-illness for talking about how The Messiah (yes, THE Messiah) has already returned, such as those prosecutors and that judge who tried to force me into a psychological-evaluation for making mention of The Messiah, when it is actually they (and most policemen in the world) who are mentally ill, for no «sane» people would engage in daily acts of extortion (bail-bonds), kidnapping (arrests), hostage-taking (jailing), perjury (violating Oaths of Office), operating under colour of law (i.e.: wearing costumes/uniforms to commit acts of violating human/natural/civil-rights), domestic-terrorism, threats, frauds, concealment-of-frauds, etc. I'M the «sane» one! I am not the one going about causing pain/harm/suffering/trauma/injury to any person or property for I live my life peacefully.
P.S.: I still need to move to Kansas. Help me move to Kansas one of these days by the way. I can even sell you a whole bunch of very rare medical-books for a huge discount! One of those extremely rare medical-books even sold for $999 to a customer at a Maryland hospital a couple of years ago! Otherwise we could do trades or something. O_O
That was sweet about what you said about women. Topeka is too far from me - sorry, like 3 hours far. Why is it that you picked Topeka of all places? That's where our tornado warnings come out of. A real hoot and holler place! Not.
19 Jan 2017, 6:54 pm
19 Jan 2017, 6:58 pm
TheSpectrum wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
I have always been told tbat a guy who really likes you will be a bit nervous.
It's when guys are too complimentive like "you're awesome" "I love your eye" "your so smart" constantly rather than wanting to find out more about you. I don't mean like the odd "your beautiful" or a compliment in context I mean like a constant stream of random conpliments they probably don't even mean.
A man who is actually interested wants to know more about you and dive deeper.
The thing that really matters aswell is if they are listening to your responses or just pretending because they think that's what you want.
I kind of rambled sorry about that
It's when guys are too complimentive like "you're awesome" "I love your eye" "your so smart" constantly rather than wanting to find out more about you. I don't mean like the odd "your beautiful" or a compliment in context I mean like a constant stream of random conpliments they probably don't even mean.
A man who is actually interested wants to know more about you and dive deeper.
The thing that really matters aswell is if they are listening to your responses or just pretending because they think that's what you want.
I kind of rambled sorry about that
No you're alright. Good to hear an honest answer.
Who's the bozo only complimenting one of your eyes? Do you wear an eye patch??
Hmm I do get nervous around the girls I like. My language even gets sheepish and I end up using a very limited vocabulary. It can be overwhelming but at the same time, do women really want that? It's no surprise they'd reject this in favour of what is seemingly perfect.
Dn my secret was revealed I am in fact a pirate. Sadly spelling is one of the perils of being on a smartphone.
The thing is that 'perfection' is really suspicious because nobody is perfect.
Perfection in speaking to you means experience with women (which isn't necessarily an issue after all we shouldn't judge people's pasts, however it makes you more highly aware of how they are with others). But the little slip ups and the embarassents even the most experienced man displays to a girl he likes. My brother has always been a massive smooth talker, it's how he has had so many um 'lady friends' despite being a large guy. When he met his now girlfriend he was a complete disaster, he accidentally insulted her, tripped her over and then fell over himself an hour later.
Seeing a guy flirting with other women is also massive turn off aswell because it just looks like they are playing a numbers game.
19 Jan 2017, 7:02 pm
19 Jan 2017, 7:05 pm
There's that, and seeing someone be rejected by others only for them to go after you must surely feel a bit insulting.
And don't worry, everyone thinks pirates are cool 
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| double standards |
12 Dec 2024, 8:17 pm |
| Societal Standards vs WP Rules about criticizing religions |
01 Dec 2024, 10:54 pm |
| Recent Setbacks for Women/Women’s Rights |
Yesterday, 4:47 pm |
| Women's pronouns |
Yesterday, 8:35 am |
