Jacoby wrote:
I don't like the term and holding it up as a separate sexual orientation I think is a very broad brush for something that is really just personal to individual as to why they are the way they are, I think the same with asexuality. All deviations from the norm don't happen innately, some people unfortunately have to carry baggage they never asked the carry.
I strongly disagree to that. My opinion instead is that the people that have invented all these labels have a really poor understanding of the issues. For instance, the asexual label is based on the assumption that if you don't like the sexual behaviour of the majority, then you must have a low sex drive or some other disability, which is a false assumption, particularly in relation to NDs. In fact, most of today's view of relationships is biased towards sex, and many people cannot even imagine a relationship without regular sex.
I don't think demisexual is any different. It doesn't describe some basic property of NDs, but instead is a mixture of several independent ND traits. As such, it is not particularly suitable for understanding ND relationship preferences.