The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
MushroomPrincess wrote:
I believe polyamory is the most natural and healthy state for a human being.
Not if your goal is to have a partner, or especially children. Polyamory detracts from your ability to pair-bond with another person, which is fine, but only if there are no children in the picture. In terms of the r/K selection theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory, partaking in polyamory is an r-selected reproduction strategy (though now obviously birth control and protection are often used to stop any actual children from being born this way, but following it to its logical conclusion, it is still an r-selected reproduction strategy). K-selected reproduction strategies are widely seen as being better for humans who produce offspring, but again if no children are involved, be as promiscuous as you want.
Also STDs would spread way more rapidly in a polygamous society.
No it wouldn't.
The subject is polymory, not polygamy. Multiple lovers, not actual official plural marriage. And the OP means both genders are allowed multiple partners.
But polyamory probably includes sex too, then how it wouldn't?
Let's assume MushroomPrincess is in relation with naturalplastic, The Grand Inquisitor, and leahbear, and they're all having sex with each other. MushroomPrincess turned out to have herpes, now all the 4 persons have herpes.
Alternatively, if MushroomPrincess only chose a monogamous relationship with The_Face_Of_Boo (god forbids!) , then only 2 will have herpes, or maybe only one because we would probably end up not having any sex (*shivers*).
That's the very point im making.
I guess its my bad. I coulda sworn that I had written "polymory might well contribute to STDs, but not Muslim polygamy that you're talking about, but then I guess went off on other topics. like polyandry and forgot to actually write it).
The "it" that I was referring to when I said "it wouldn't spread STDs anymore than monogamy" is "Polygamy" (the word you used). Polymory(what the op is talking about) , on the other hand, might well spread stds more.
You were talking about polygamy in traditional muslim countries (polygamy which is always also polygyny, and is never polyandry). Sheiks with multiple wives are not spreading STDs anymore than monogamous couples are. In contrast traveling rockstars with groupies in every town probably are. The later is polymory but not polygamy.
From what I understand, Polyamory is usually a multi-mutual-commitment, so like the the Islamic polygyny, you are committed to f**k only certain people; but it still exposes more people to STD like how i demonstrated in my example but not as much as the open polyamory that you're describing (and like in the OP case, I have re-read thread
and noticed she talked about orgies, so yeah, you're right, she's talking about fully open polyamory).