Mitchell M. wrote:
Just speak your mind or don't say anything at all.
WP's rules need to be respected. It would've been wrong to just immediately post my opinion on the OP's question, because it could've come across as a personal attack on the OP -- unintentionally. To make it clear that no personal attack is intended, it's respectful to first check whether or not the person wants to hear the bad news.
For example, it's possible that the OP could've replied to my message with something along the lines of: "Don't worry, I promise not to hate you. I want to hear the bad news even if it hurts."
Then it would be appropriate to post a second message (part 2) with my opinion on the question, because I'd have the OP's permission/invitation to do that. Alternatively, if the OP never replies to my message, then it's better to leave my opinion unsaid, because she's not interested in it. This method is respectful to the OP and respectful to WP's rules.
Mitchell M. wrote:
Weird cryptic messages don't add to the conversation.
That's because, as I mentioned in my previous message, it's advisible to split it into multiple pieces over time. That's why the first message is not fully comprehensible -- because it's only part 1 of 2. To understand it properly, you need to read part 2, but part 2 will never be posted unless the OP says she wants to read part 2 including bad news. That's the right way of handling this.
Also, I believe you might have missed or discounted the following part of the OP's message:
kmb501 wrote:
people who are interested in the things I'm interested in (hopefully to the point of having a secret spy lair in the basement)
See, the OP's message indicates she likes secret things, and my message also mentioned secrets, therefore the theme of my message is the same theme as the OP's theme. That's respectful and fun.
This thread belongs to the OP. Let the OP make her own decision instead of making it for her.