Why are less people getting married?
Mikurotoro92
Veteran
Joined: 30 Aug 2022
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,133
Location: Mushroom Kingdom or Bikini Bottom
In the US, most people seem to desire marriage. Members of my wife's family have generally gotten married and most have had children. It's my impression that Americans in general want to get married unlike Europeans. The people who aren't getting married are probably discouraged by socioeconomic factors. In particular, if they get government benefits, it might be advantageous for them to stay single.
BTW I think Fnord raised some valid points as well.
There is a MAJOR difference between "desiring marriage" and actually "getting married" though
Most people may desire getting married but only the ones who are dedicated and patient enough to slog through the dating/courting process succeed!! !
IDK what the situation is in Europe but here in the U.S people would rather co-habitate or stay single because it is safer
Nightwing82
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 30 Apr 2024
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 57
Location: Oklahoma City
Mikurotoro92
Veteran
Joined: 30 Aug 2022
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,133
Location: Mushroom Kingdom or Bikini Bottom
I have some theories as to what is causing this change:
-People do not wish to have to go through the long arduous tiresome process of dating/courting just to enter a marriage that might not ultimately work out!
-Marriage and everything that comes with it is too expensive so as a result less people decide to do it
-Cohabitation is a MUCH safer choice of relationship living configuration than marriage because it offers an easy way out if things were to go south with your partner and people are starting to catch on to that
-Also people have higher priorities in their life besides finding love like their careers or they just simply aren't interested in creating and maintaining a long-term romantic relationship
The only people left who still want to get married are the ones who want the wedding & honeymoon experience
That's the main reason I'm doing it!
Do you agree with my hypothesis?
Disclaimer: My education and training in this sphere applies only to the United States.
Sociologically speaking, marriage rates are falling because people (who are rational beings and respond to rewards/punishments) have fewer social/cultural/financial incentives to marry and stay married.
No-fault divorce laws profoundly changed the landscape of marriage in the US. It used to be difficult to marry and near-impossible to divorce, then it became easy to marry and difficult to divorce, and finally, it became very easy to marry and easy to divorce. Americans slowly transitioned from traditional monogamy (one spouse until death) to serial monogamy (one spouse at a time), and are now on track to not practice monogamy at all.
Easier access to divorce (and child support payments) results in a greater number of failed marriages. Shorter periods of courtship, premarital cohabitation, fewer children, having divorced parents themselves, marrying someone of a different religion, having severe educational differences, etc., all individually correlate (*correlation is not causation*) with an increase in divorce risk. When these factors are aggregated, successful marriage rates plummet.
Is it possible to have a successful marriage, despite having all of the above risk factors? Yes, on a micro/individual scale, it certainly is. But when we look at the macro-level data, it all points to an increase in marriage failure rates. When entire generations have witnessed astronomical marital failure, they are logically hesitant to marry. We most readily see that play out in the increase in premarital cohabitation (which, counterintuitively, social scientists have known for decades is correlated with divorce), as well as the delay of first marriages into the 30s and beyond.
All of this was established well before the advent of technology/the internet in courtship/dating (not to mention easier access to behaviors associated with marital infidelity). I suspect that single factor holds significant power in accelerating the decline of marriage, but this is pure speculation on my part; my formal studies largely concluded in the early 2000s.
Best explanation in my opinion
_________________
Graves Kingdom Come
Marriage used to be more common because there was more social, religious, and political pressures to get married and stay married. Less people are getting married because it's more socially acceptable.
It's like as if humanity had a commitment issue all this time.
_________________
Graves Kingdom Come
Mikurotoro92
Veteran
Joined: 30 Aug 2022
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,133
Location: Mushroom Kingdom or Bikini Bottom
Disclaimer: My education and training in this sphere applies only to the United States.
Sociologically speaking, marriage rates are falling because people (who are rational beings and respond to rewards/punishments) have fewer social/cultural/financial incentives to marry and stay married.
No-fault divorce laws profoundly changed the landscape of marriage in the US. It used to be difficult to marry and near-impossible to divorce, then it became easy to marry and difficult to divorce, and finally, it became very easy to marry and easy to divorce. Americans slowly transitioned from traditional monogamy (one spouse until death) to serial monogamy (one spouse at a time), and are now on track to not practice monogamy at all.
Easier access to divorce (and child support payments) results in a greater number of failed marriages. Shorter periods of courtship, premarital cohabitation, fewer children, having divorced parents themselves, marrying someone of a different religion, having severe educational differences, etc., all individually correlate (*correlation is not causation*) with an increase in divorce risk. When these factors are aggregated, successful marriage rates plummet.
Is it possible to have a successful marriage, despite having all of the above risk factors? Yes, on a micro/individual scale, it certainly is. But when we look at the macro-level data, it all points to an increase in marriage failure rates. When entire generations have witnessed astronomical marital failure, they are logically hesitant to marry. We most readily see that play out in the increase in premarital cohabitation (which, counterintuitively, social scientists have known for decades is correlated with divorce), as well as the delay of first marriages into the 30s and beyond.
All of this was established well before the advent of technology/the internet in courtship/dating (not to mention easier access to behaviors associated with marital infidelity). I suspect that single factor holds significant power in accelerating the decline of marriage, but this is pure speculation on my part; my formal studies largely concluded in the early 2000s.
All of what you said is spot-on and makes a LOT of sense!! !
But I wanted to draw my attention to what you said about the many different possible risk factors for a marriage that could hurt its chances for survival...
Specifically the part about "aggregated data"
Are you suggesting that all the previously-mentioned risks if combined together (aggregated) have a higher chance of resulting in divorce?
If that is true...
Last edited by Mikurotoro92 on 05 Jan 2025, 12:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mikurotoro92
Veteran
Joined: 30 Aug 2022
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,133
Location: Mushroom Kingdom or Bikini Bottom
Cohabiting can be a precursor to marriage. I wouldn’t marry someone without living with them first, not that I want to remarry. Some studies have shown that couples who live with each other first are more likely to get divorced, but correlation doesn’t necessarily equal causation.
In very religious circles, people typically don’t live together before marriage. They often have a negative view of divorce, too. Some believe in staying together unless there’s infidelity which can be quite toxic. Just because a couple stays married doesn’t mean their relationship was a success.
I don’t really see divorce as a bad thing that should be avoided at all costs. If a relationship is leading to unhappiness or worse, there’s nothing wrong with ending it. Life’s too short to spend it in an unhappy marriage or relationship. That’s not to say that couples should give up as soon as they run into trouble. I’m just saying that it’s okay if it doesn’t work out.
_________________
“Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.” — Satan and TwilightPrincess
Mikurotoro92
Veteran
Joined: 30 Aug 2022
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,133
Location: Mushroom Kingdom or Bikini Bottom
In very religious circles, people typically don’t live together before marriage. They often have a negative view of divorce, too. Some believe in staying together unless there’s infidelity which can be quite toxic. Just because a couple stays married doesn’t mean their relationship was a success.
I don’t really see divorce as a bad thing that should be avoided at all costs. If a relationship is leading to unhappiness or worse, there’s nothing wrong with ending it. Life’s too short to spend it in an unhappy marriage or relationship. That’s not to say that couples should give up as soon as they run into trouble. I’m just saying that it’s okay if it doesn’t work out.
I too believe in co-habitation as the precursor to marriage but unfortunately David does not!! !
Must have something to do with what you said about religious people
(David is a Christian)
My neighbor Glenn also does not believe in co-habitation prior to marriage
Again, he is religious
Same holds true for my neighbor Anita I think
Now I am beginning to sense some sort of pattern here...
The connection between co-habitation as a precursor to marriage and divorce!! !
I believe the reason a lot of marriages of my friends and neighbors have lasted for 10 years or more is because...they did not co-habitate before getting married?
In other words they immediately jumped to marriage without living together first!
Might I even suggest that Christians are the ones who have the longest marriages?
What do you think TP?
Last edited by Mikurotoro92 on 04 Jan 2025, 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mikurotoro92
Veteran
Joined: 30 Aug 2022
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,133
Location: Mushroom Kingdom or Bikini Bottom
Maybe your friends were fortunate in finding people who were right for them.
Oh okay
I misinterpreted!! !
Well...co-habitation can also lead to the decision of not getting married at all
So it can go both ways I think!
The definition of co-habitating in the context of a romantic relationship is a couple who are living together without being married, correct?
Shouldn't marriage also count as co-habitation?
It fits the definition of "co-habitation" because marriage involves a man and a woman living together
In reality, marriage is one possible configuration type of co-habitation besides a couple not being married but still living together!! !
Technically, you could even say me and my brother are currently co-habitating despite obviously not being romantically involved!
The way I look at it there are 3 possible configuration types for co-habitation:
1. Marriage
2. Boyfriend and Girlfriend (without marriage)
3. Family or Roommate
If we split each type into sub-types we get...
1. Romantic Co-habitation
&
2. Familial or Roommate Co-habitation
Has the idea become too risky and high-stakes for people?
Or they cannot afford the cost of a wedding, honeymoon and eventually...children?
What do you guys think?
I think a lot of it is because there are less serious religious people and society is more accepting of living together before or in place of marriage. Also because divorce rates are still high. Also a lot of people cant afford a wedding honeymoon and multiple kids.
I have not gotten married yet because I would lose my benefits if I got married and also because I have not found the right Church of Christ woman yet. Also I want to have a spiritual marriage instead of a legal marriage through the state.I dont want to do the legal paperwork because I dont want to lose half my assets and future assets. But really the only reason why I even want to get married is because I am religious.....I would have no incentive to ever get married if I was not religious. However life as a single is okay for me right now so I dont know if I will get married or not....It just depends if I find the right woman.
Maybe your friends were fortunate in finding people who were right for them.
Oh okay
I misinterpreted!! !
Well...co-habitation can also lead to the decision of not getting married at all
So it can go both ways I think!
The definition of co-habitating in the context of a romantic relationship is a couple who are living together without being married, correct?
Shouldn't marriage also count as co-habitation?
It fits the definition of "co-habitation" because marriage involves a man and a woman living together
In reality, marriage is one possible configuration type of co-habitation besides a couple not being married but still living together!! !
Technically, you could even say me and my brother are currently co-habitating despite obviously not being romantically involved!
The way I look at it there are 3 possible configuration types for co-habitation:
1. Marriage
2. Boyfriend and Girlfriend (without marriage)
3. Family or Roommate
If we split each type into sub-types we get...
1. Romantic Co-habitation
&
2. Familial or Roommate Co-habitation
Regarding co-habitation, I have some experience on which to draw. So when I was 24, I was sharing a room with 2 other guys in a house with quite a few other students. I met a girl around her 21st birthday who had just moved out of her parents' house. After she took me into her bedroom one evening, I simply just continued to sleep there every night. There was really no conscious decision but there was no real reason to sleep elsewhere. That was Spring semester. Fall semester, that became my semi-official place of residence (legally I still lived with my parents in another state). Along the way, via miscommunication, my then girlfriend believed I had proposed to her (although I hadn't seriously thought about marriage). At the end of the semester, I went to a job fair much closer to where my family lived, got hired by a company I spoke with there (the job turned out a disaster btw) and simply moved out. When I look back at that sequence of events, I feel a great deal of shame. She (and her family) continued to think we'd get married for quite some time.
Anyway, when I thought about all that later, I couldn't help thinking that any sort of co-habitation arrangement is likely to end badly if it doesn't end in marriage. Other people do co-habitate without long-term plans, but if the situation comes to an end, it's liable to be ugly. And other people can apparently move in and out of such situations without much fuss (probably very few autistics can manage that though). Sometimes people move in together as lovers then continue to co-habitate after they have stopped being intimate with each other (like if they can't immediately find somewhere else to live).
Right before I met my wife, I got involved with a woman who probably had Borderline Personality Disorder. It would seem she wanted to come live with me, so every time she came to visit she would bring with her some random item of cookware or whatever, although I had never actually told her I wanted her to move in. By that point in my life, I could see no good outcome from that.
I moved in with my wife AFTER we had decided to get married and were already beginning to plan our wedding.
Your situation is different as, if I understand correctly, you are both disabled and getting benefits, and that aspect of your lives is unlikely to change. Getting married might not be a bad idea for you, but of course you must be very certain the marriage won't end badly. I wouldn't waste a minute considering religious arguments however. Getting married or not getting married should have nothing to do with religion except the actual wedding, at least in your case as you aren't a Mormon or something like that. However there is the aspect that co-habiting would have a practical aspect to it as you would be sharing a single place of residence (in your case your brother is also living there) and would probably also continue to get support. Whereas if you weren't on disability, you'd have more options. But I am a pragmatist and I believe one should work with whatever one has.
Sorry if I've given a lot of information without really saying what I think you should do.
EDIT at this stage in your relationship, it might be better for you to continue to just see each other occasionally, despite the practical advantages of his moving in, as that seems to be working for the most part.
_________________
“Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.” — Satan and TwilightPrincess
If 2 people are sufficiently committed to each other that they're ready to get married, then maybe it doesn't matter if they actually get legally married, but I guess it doesn't technically matter if they actually do. This seems to be the trend in Europe. I am glad I got married, but that's just my experience.
But when I was in my early 20s, I didn't see anything wrong with living together with somebody if I was having sex with them. But my understanding of people at that time in my life was minimal.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Why do people get surprised if you're a certain age and... |
11 Nov 2024, 12:40 pm |
Animals > People? |
25 Nov 2024, 12:45 pm |
People asking you if you're ''retarded'' |
24 Nov 2024, 4:11 pm |
Do people really believe in this statement? |
13 Dec 2024, 7:32 am |