DuceXcreW wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
Also, I feel that [Aspies] are morally superior to NTs.
Macallan wrote:
How are you defining 'morally superior'?
Tim_Tex wrote:
Aspies ... are less likely to lie or cheat.
Macallan wrote:
People are people, each one an individual tangled conundrum of good and bad qualities and personality traits, and it's way too simplistic to label them.
Good discussion ^__^
Problem appears to be that you are both right. May I suggest something though? Men are pigs. That doesn't mean all men are pigs, it just means, that if you look at a guy, he's more likely to be a pig than not likely. (Uhh. I'm just using this as an example -- I'm not trying to go on a tangent, nor will I confirm or deny that I believe my statement is true -- it is an
example)
I agree with Tim -- that Aspies have practical moral superiority on the basis of a tendency to be unable to lie (often? well? Throw in whatever conditioner you wish). But that doesn't mean ALL people with AS. But Macallan, that doesn't mean (1) we *have* to also date NT's (2) we must pretend (what I'm going to call) a statistical fact doesn't exist when looking to ask someone out.
An example of what I mean: Male homosexuals. No. Not all homosexuals have loose wrists -- So you can't assume (point 1) that all homosexuals will. But, if you are talking to a gay guy, you can watch his wrists if you want (point 2).
Or does this not make sense to anybody but me?
I think I understand your point.
What I was trying to say was that attraction and love aren't always logical and therefore if anyone yearns for a partner it seems to be unnecessarily rigid to apply preconditions such AS status. Of course no AS person has to date NTs but to decide not to is cutting out a large swathe of potential partners. I am certain that there NTs out there who are honest and loyal, and who would not cheat on a partner. (I have an NT friend with AS traits whose wife cheated on him and left him. It never occurred to him to say 'right, AS people only for me in future'. He's now happily married to a thoroughly NT woman who wouldn't dream of cheating on him.)
And what about the role of pheromones? What would happen if Tim, for example, met an NT woman whose pheromones were a perfect match for his but she is off-limits because of his self-imposed rules regarding her neurological status? To me, that would be a wasted opportunity for a potentially rewarding relationship. I don't believe that there is a distinct, discrete boundary between AS and NT. Both are on a larger all-encompassing spectrum of human neurology and where the two join there must be AS people with NT traits and NT people with AS traits.
No-one wants to repeat a bad experience but just because it happened with one person (NT or otherwise) doesn't mean it will happen with another. People are individuals, regardless of their neurological status. Just look at the wide disparity within the AS spectrum as represented here on WP. None of us are the same.
Good debate, guys