I got a bridge to sell ya
windscar15 wrote:
This is an old story, but here it goes
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
This is fair enough, no one is really better than you btw. Physical attraction is crucial.
Meh, it's all a matter of taste. I don't find overweight girls attractive but I don't feel the need to justify it, nor do I think it to be a fact that such girls aren't attractive.
Plus, captive pandas don't mate with anyone unless someone shows them some panda porn, regardless of how fat or skinny they are. Actually, who's ever heard of a skinny panda? lol.
RogueProcess wrote:
Bwahahahah! XD Thank you so much for that.
windscar15 wrote:
This is an old story, but here it goes
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
Really and truly windscar15, WHATs your Point??? You've already told us REPEATEDLY that you judge women by their looks which Is your perogative but Why are we supposed to still care? Futhermore, although I havent seen any pictures of you yet you SHOULD be aware that: 1)Women REALLY Dont like fat men. In fact AFAIK there are more men who like BBWs than women who like ManBlimps 2)If you are going to be picky than you Are in No position to complain if/when a woman rejects you because you dont meet some superficial criterian she has .
Veresae wrote:
Meh, it's all a matter of taste. I don't find overweight girls attractive but I don't feel the need to justify it, nor do I think it to be a fact that such girls aren't attractive.
Well said . I pretty much feel the same way.
Haliphron wrote:
Futhermore, although I havent seen any pictures of you yet you SHOULD be aware that: 1)Women REALLY Dont like fat men.
Why would you say that?? I like fat men. And you couldn't even say that most women don't like fat men.. it all varies a LOT person to person. That doesn't even matter anyway!
I am not trying to defend windscar, or anyone really, but you can't say that ALL women are anything, really.
Haliphron wrote:
you SHOULD be aware that: 1)Women REALLY Dont like fat men. In fact AFAIK there are more men who like BBWs than women who like ManBlimps
Meh, are the acoustics that bad in here, or how did you miss THIS?
Haliphron wrote:
2)If you are going to be picky than you Are in No position to complain if/when a woman rejects you because you dont meet some superficial criterian she has .
Amen to that.
_________________
- NYGOI
NB: contents of above post represent my opinion at time of post only. YMMV, NAYY, and most importantly, IALBTC!
nekowafer wrote:
Haliphron wrote:
Futhermore, although I havent seen any pictures of you yet you SHOULD be aware that: 1)Women REALLY Dont like fat men.
Why would you say that?? I like fat men. And you couldn't even say that most women don't like fat men.. it all varies a LOT person to person. That doesn't even matter anyway!
I am not trying to defend windscar, or anyone really, but you can't say that ALL women are anything, really.
Well there's ALWAYS going to be an exception to every rule now. But I frequently hear women complaining about Fat men and how repulsive they are. Furthermore, I AM quite certain that most women STRONGLY like Tall Men better than short guys. If you look at online personals adds placed by straight women they often say they want a tall man and give a minimum height requirement.
Haliphron wrote:
Well there's ALWAYS going to be an exception to every rule now. But I frequently hear women complaining about Fat men and how repulsive they are. Furthermore, I AM quite certain that most women STRONGLY like Tall Men better than short guys. If you look at online personals adds placed by straight women they often say they want a tall man and give a minimum height requirement.
You can't even say "most" women like anything.. online personals are a very small percentage of all women looking for a male mate. Also, maybe they just don't like the fat men that can't take care of themselves. I think fat men who don't shower often enough are repulsive.. but that's true of anyone that doesn't take care of their body, fat or not.
As for height, most women just like men taller than them. So "tall" is completely relative. Also, I'd have to say I usually like tall men.. but have dated a few shorter than me.
Haliphron wrote:
windscar15 wrote:
This is an old story, but here it goes
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
Really and truly windscar15, WHATs your Point??? You've already told us REPEATEDLY that you judge women by their looks which Is your perogative but Why are we supposed to still care? Futhermore, although I havent seen any pictures of you yet you SHOULD be aware that: 1)Women REALLY Dont like fat men. In fact AFAIK there are more men who like BBWs than women who like ManBlimps 2)If you are going to be picky than you Are in No position to complain if/when a woman rejects you because you dont meet some superficial criterian she has .
Veresae wrote:
Meh, it's all a matter of taste. I don't find overweight girls attractive but I don't feel the need to justify it, nor do I think it to be a fact that such girls aren't attractive.
Well said . I pretty much feel the same way.
Okay what do you look like
Let's see
If you wanna know what I look like, take a look on AspieAffection, its under my name
I'm just trying to respond to all the desperation here.
windscar15 wrote:
This is an old story, but here it goes
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
Your rationalization for being shallow has been reviewed and rejected. Your "no fat girls policy" has been overruled. You may go back to being a decent human being at your earliest possible convenience regardless of the pandas.
NeantHumain wrote:
windscar15 wrote:
This is an old story, but here it goes
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
Your rationalization for being shallow has been reviewed and rejected. Your "no fat girls policy" has been overruled. You may go back to being a decent human being at your earliest possible convenience regardless of the pandas.
Can I at this point ask what's wrong with dating "Fat" girls? last time I checked, they're all there, they may be a bit more there, then the skinny fashion models you want, but their there all the same.
_________________
I want peace for all. Simple yet elegant.
NeantHumain wrote:
windscar15 wrote:
This is an old story, but here it goes
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
Your rationalization for being shallow has been reviewed and rejected. Your "no fat girls policy" has been overruled. You may go back to being a decent human being at your earliest possible convenience regardless of the pandas.
And you may get off the internet and get an actual life.
windscar15 wrote:
NeantHumain wrote:
windscar15 wrote:
This is an old story, but here it goes
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
The pandas in the DC zoo were supposed to have kids, but the female wouldn't get down and dirty with the male because he was too fat and large. Two animals with no sense of animal attraction, got that.
Now, if a panda can refuse a mate over appearance than I can do the same thing with, say an overweight girl or man if I was gay.
This is essentially a complete justification for my no fat girls policy. Personality wise, you're cool, but I'm not turned by the looks and no human is ever turned on by personality alone.
Your rationalization for being shallow has been reviewed and rejected. Your "no fat girls policy" has been overruled. You may go back to being a decent human being at your earliest possible convenience regardless of the pandas.
And you may get off the internet and get an actual life.
Why dont YOU get off the internet and get an actual life yourself windscar15!
Playing zero-sum games is going to get you Nowhere on WP. We heard your fill about what you like and dont like and why and guess what? NOBODY REALLY CARES anymore.