Womens' Bodies.... What do guys ACTUALLY want???

Post Reply New Topic

That's where you and I hit the fork in the road, Cal.

You don't like Marilyn's weight, which I don't understand.

I, on the other hand, find it unattractive that she's dead.

Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Last edited by geek on 16 Sep 2007, 11:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

True. I tend towards VERY slender.
Indeed, my obsession has a boylike
body.

My wife was clearly a more womanly
body, but she didn't have any excess
fat on her.

As to dead, you can't really expect
my type to be interested in a different
one, can you?

Jesus Christ! Thats Huge for a woman! Sorry I dont meant to make you feel bad but Im 6'3" and I rarely encounter women that tall.
As far as what bodytype I'm attracted to I would say its someone who's neither fat NOR thin. What I always say is slightly heavier than average but not "fat"(obese). If a woman's belly is bigger than her hips thats where I draw the line. Its my understanding that Most women find obese men to be equally unattractive as men find obese women. Its been said that obesity is a sign of bad genes; but not only is it unsightly its unhealthy as well. I tend to notice women legs and butts before the rest of them. I have a very preferrence to women with big, round, full butts. But good legs are a must if Im gonna get in the sack with her. For some reason I tend to attract petite chicks; the first girl I was with was 5'3" and the tallest Ive ever been with(physically) was 5'4". If I get married Im guessing that whoever she is she will probably be pretty short.

And I'm 6' - watch you don't fall over with the shock, Ziyaret

That's not far off the mark for me. My first wife accused me of liking boys because of that, but that's not the case at all. My best theory is that I still feel like a kid, and the last time in life that I was really able to relate to other people was when I was much younger. Nowadays, I primarily relate to myself, and so I think I look for a female version of me. Being skinny and gracile myself, that's what I relate to. It doesn't help me, though. There are few women like this.

I also don't get the consternation of women when I say I like thin girls. I'm not disparaging girls who aren't, I'm just not attracted to them. I'm not trying to proselytize women into being thin. Women discriminate based on height, but that's apparently ok. To each their own.

Stupidest paragraph I've read in my life. Tall women = sexy. Why the hell would you date a 5 foot midget? You gotta lean over to hear what she's saying, you look incongruent walking around, in bed things will be completely awkward.

Actually Joybob, what you just said is extrodinarily stupid-not mention ignorant. Did it ever occur to you that sexual attraction in fact is subjective rather than objective? You cannot expect other guys to like the same things that you do Bub. My height ranger for women is: 5'<, <6', so go figure dipshit.

His subjective opinion is that tall=sexy. You just disagree.

I have seen a lot of women (at least 30 yrs old), who age themselves when they lose a lot weight. The loss of fat in the face is part of the aging process. Therefore, a 30 year old women can end up looking more like 40 when she is underweight. Of course there is always plastic surgery, but that is a whole other topic...



Well, women are famous for lying about their weight! LOL!



I agree w/ you to a point. However, some of these comments border on that of a pedophile. BTW, the majority of young women who have naturally big boobs are already dealing w/ issues of sagging. It is not uncommon to see a busty 18 year old w/ saggy boobs! Gravity is a b***h!

I think that people like to have answers that justify their own beliefs in a nice, tidy package.

Want to hear something funny? Among our closest relatives, the champanzees, the most prized female sexual partners are those who are older and more experienced. So maybe the cult of youth isn't an inevitable natural law after all.

No. Tall women being sexy is an objective property of the universe.

Our closest relatives are bonobos or pigmy chimpanzee not the common chimpanzee. it is them that are matriarchal. The common chimpanzee is patriarchal.

I prefer women with a bone density index of -0.5 or greater

To me, a nice smile and pretty eyes are most important when it comes to female looks. As long as the face looks good, I pretty much will find the rest of the body attractive in most cases.

Weirdly enough (?) several of the girls I had a crush on had rather small breasts (A cup or a small B) and still I found them very attractive. Probably because I liked the person they were, once you like a person you tend to find the person attractive as well. But I often find girls sexy despite having rather small breasts, I absolutely disagree that it would be "un-female" or "rather masculin".

And yet I find short women sex too. Not to mention the fact that women taller than 6' are not my style. So there's a counterexample to your claim, so suck it up w*ker.

Bonobos are slightly closer, but you can't really make any clear statements about their preferences, other than their tendency to avoid having sex with their closest relatives. They're usually happy to have sex with whoever they happen to come into contact with, regardless of age or other factors. So the only lessons they have to teach us is that nature doesn't frown on promiscuity, but that it's still perfectly normal to not be turned on by your parents.