Gonna try acting like a dick towards NT party girls

Post Reply New Topic

Correct.



That's hardly my fault, when 95% of what you write makes no sense whatsoever.



Definitely, when that mere male is you.

Just as a point of order, Brian003, I spell "categorisation" correctly.

As you can see from this: http://forum.wordreference.com/showpost.php?p=154159, I suspect you are resident in old, abandoned colony of ours.

Okay Julie, I finally found out how to predict your writing:

You are most definitely an "uber-feminist."

But you are also a Narcissistic.

So you are a Narcissistic Uber-Feminist(Just when being an uber-feminist wasn't enough).

Though many people will AS seem to came across as Narcissistic(It might just be to the one-sided viewpoint).

Heck, if you were 20 you would probably be pretty hot.

Also; you cannot compete with something you cannot understand. heh.

Don't argue with me about that then. Press edit and argue with the spell check function.

EDIT: WHAT DID THAT ARTICLE JUST SAY?

While I can have a fun conversation with someone like juliekittie or shadexiii you take my posts way too seriously so I will consciously try and not argue with you.

Last edited by Brian003 on 08 Jan 2008, 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I can't speak for your friends, but I don't think women are superior to men. I think they have just as many faults, but the faults are different.

Due to physical power and testosterone, male faults are a lot more likely to be expressed through violence, so they're more directly damaging in many cases. However, female faults are more likely to be expressed through covert behaviour, which is irritating as hell.

Personally, I tend to prefer men because they are more direct. But a lot of aspie women say that -- and it's probably because it's so damn hard for us to figure out what NT women are really saying and doing a lot of the time. I feel for you straight aspie guys trying to get it on with them.

Spell checks created by Americans are inherently flawed.

The spell check incorrectly thinks "behaviour" is a misspelling, too.

Yup. Once again, your post makes no sense at all.

I shudder to think how low admission standards at the University of Michigan must be.

lol

especially for those who write in "English"

A) American Writing
B) University of Michigan

What's next, Harvard?

Well anyway; I have given up arguing with Julie right now.
Being annoying arrogant is one thing; but thinking that you know better than the rest of the world is a completely different category.

I refuse to argue with a narcissistic.

You win.

1. My grouping outlined a tendency to a group. I never said that I didn't group people. That would be clearly false. Feminists, neurotypicals, people with AS, autistics, men, and women are all groups. All of these groups have certain criteria that define them, whether it is a pattern of beliefs, a neurochemical condition, or what genitals you hide. All of these groups also have tendencies that may usually be true; this does not mean that all members of these groups possess said tendencies.



2. This does not address my attack. You cannot logically refute my case, so you poke fun at my logical methods by calling them "comical". I simply wanted to exemplify this clearly because I didn't think that you would understand it if I stated it concisely. However, you clearly were so caught up in the nature of this example that you failed to comprehend the content of the attack. When reading my arguments, cite specific sentences and refute their semantic content like this: "You said that A means B. However, A does not mean B because..." That is proper arguing. An example of your argument tactics would be like this: "You said that A means B like this. Because of how you argued, I'll assume that you really mean C and C is wrong." In doing that, you have only addressed the aesthetic and assumed meaning of my argument. The content stands. You did not address the content. To say you did is an illusion.



Click here.

Regarding the prefix "über", it is a German prefix with an augmentative connotation.

Since you have decided to improperly correct me, I shall point out that "Math" needn't be capitalised (British spelling). The only school subjects that must be capitalised are languages.



Society has reached the consensus that this is wrong. You are making the departure here; therefore you must prove your claim. Do you have any philosophical resource that would claim that vulnerability constitutes fault? Or are you simply drawing from your own infinite wisdom? Furthermore, are you willing to universalise this? Is every victim an agent in their suffering because they failed to prevent it? Is every autistic who is forced to give eye contact responsible for their pain because of their autism? (FYI, autistics generally (not always) find eye contact somewhat painful.) If you universalise your maxim that vulnerability constitutes agency, it yields an undesirable conclusion. Thus, it fails to meet the "Imperfect Duty" criterion outlined by Immanuel Kant in his "Categorical Imperative", which you can read about by clicking here.



This misquoting. Since your University of Michigan education didn't seem to teach you this, I'll inform you that it's porm argument form (I learned this in high school debate).



I'd get my psychology degree and spend some time with someone before making diagnoses.

Sheesh. What a buffoon.

Yeah, sometimes I almost wonder if I should take up headbanging, may not do much for me here but it could be rather refreshing at times.

And you wonder why you people never get along with other people......?

No....you are exactly right. It is impossible for a neurotypical to rationally argue with you people.
You make up your own arguments as you go along and then you obsess over them and call the neurotypical stupid because they simply cannot understand.

But not to worry; you won't need any sort of education for this.

I will give you a more more realistic example-



Teacher- How do you beat someone who looks like this in an internet argument?

Class Responds- You Don't.

The sad part is that this is exactly how I thought high functioning autistics would act like. I always thought that you guys were nice people and good for society....but you are always just so arrogant that I honestly wonder how positive of an impact you do have on society.

Sure you may be a better philosopher than me; sure you might be better at writing than me, ad lots of other things.

But you don't need to SHOVE IT INTO THE FACE OF SOME PERSON JUST BECAUSE YOU DO NOT LIKE THEM.

You disgrace my intelligence, you disgrace my school, and then you call me a buffoon.

Well I hope you learn something from all of this....I know that I did.

I won't be posting in this site anymore because I found what I was looking for. Maybe in the future neurotypicals and aspies can get along well one day...but that won't be for a long time.

I don't dislike you; I don't even know you. I did not disgrace your intelligence or your school; I simply pointed out your inconsistencies. The attack on your school was made by JulieKitty, as was the naming you a buffoon (and I wouldn't call either unwarranted).

The viewing of my picture for public disgrace would be inappropriate if could understand the insult. I'm swing dancing. Apparently, you just wanted to insult my appearance. I don't care about my face; I care about what's behind it.

I have no problem with neurotypicals; I am VERY good friends with some (and in love with one). What you wrote is not evidence of neurotypicality; it's evidence of ignorance. So, since you're not even going to read this, I have no problem posting it: your arguments are completely incoherent and show me that you are an unintelligent person.

Adherence to logical principles and good debating skills are not arrogance. Autistics are not categorically arrogant. You simply perceive a superior intelligence (and you admitted that this is what I am) as a threat and are immediately willing to write it off as a fallible characteristic. My arguments are not made up; I gave you a link to a wikipedia page about it.

I think that one day autistics and neurotypicals will be able to get along, but not without considerable measures being taken by the majority to expand their theory of mind to include the minority.

And I do get along with other people quite well. The user xrenegadexsadizt and I are very close friends.

The problem isn't your neurotypicality. The problem is your stupidity.



Yes, we learned that you are hopelessly idiotic.



Oh, good. Don't worry, it's a great big Internet, and you're sure to find a forum full of morons you can play with happily.