Gonna try acting like a dick towards NT party girls

Post Reply New Topic

So, the person who forgets to lock all their windows at night is every bit as guilty as the burglar who climbs in and steals their TV? I don't think so. I doubt you would agree with this either, so what exactly do you think makes drunk women getting raped any different?

Are you against drinking in general? There are plenty of moral arguements against it, for instance, taxpayers money being wasted on binge drinkers being admitted to A&E, or the violence it causes in some people.

What I would say is that many people like to have a drink on a night out, relax at the end of the day and have some fun. It is all to easy to take it that little bit to far. Of course it is a mistake and something you should be trying not to do, but to say that rape sounds like an excessively harsh punishment would be an understatement.

Basically, how can the two people be equally responsible when one has made a daft mistake and the other has committed an awful crime?

You forget the members, both men and women, of the 10% that want a real relationship and so on but fail to get one, or find one but it goes sour or otherwise fails. Just thinking about relationships is depressing to me; frankly, I wished I didn't want a proper relationship and had the social skills to get the shallow ones. I would certainly be a lot happier.
I think both women who willingly go for obvious jerks/etc and men who go for obvious gold diggers/b*****s/psychos/etc deserve what they get.

Logic isn't in the equation for this one. His views are based on rash self-interest and exaggerated labels.

Notion seconded. Except this psychos part. I love psychotic women. They're a lot of fun. A little scary, but I like being the best friend of a serial killer.

I don't know if I even partially agree, but I feel you.
It's my belief that many modern progressives and/or liberals want us all to live in a blameless society. A society where you can do anything and you are never unwise or partially at fault for putting yourself in harms way.

Everyone is faultless wittle souls UNLESS they belong to the moderate or conservative wealthy, conservatives, or if they are or are working for THE MAN.

Just want to point out that Brian003 is NT, and his Interests in his profile are:

"Being a prick 24/7"

so it seems that pissing people off is a passion for him.

Objectively maybe that's true but you can't build a country's laws based on that concept. A fair law must always punish the criminal and protect the victim even if the victim was too idiot and put him/herself at risk. Stupidity of someone A doesn't justify the crime committed by someone B toward A.

JKRANE WHERE ARE THE RESULTS???

sorry for the caps

In all areas of life I believe that you cannot punish someone for being an idiot, even if you'd sometimes like to. Perhaps the best way of drawing a distinction between the opportunistic criminal and a person who puts themself at risk is that the former has acted, as the judge might say, 'with malicious intent' - they have proactively gone out to cause harm. The latter, in contrast to this, has not thought at all. Perhaps they are idiotic, but they have not been proactive in hurting another person.

Seconded! Even if it was a SNAFU or a FUBAR, surely you learned from it, right? Tell us what happened and we shall lose no respect for you. We shall only lose respect if you refuse to keep your promise to reveal the results.

13 pages and no results? I'm beginning to think it's a joke. Or it could be that it didnt work..lol.

I don't think it was a joke since he was a regular poster before this thread and so he is probably not a troll (at least not intentionally so). I'm leaning toward the latter guess. Still, I feel he should keep his promise he made at the commencement of this thread.

Its not just that, if he's chasing that angle he'll have to find a way to consistently look, act, and vibe like he's been NT all his life - that may take more than 13 pages, I'm thinking more likely a new lifetime in a different body.

true. i think he was looking for a one night stand though.

I still think he'd have a hell of a time though. Then again he probably doesn't think nearly as much as I do so I guess it could happen.

All groups have tendencies.



I wasn't describing "neurochemical conditions" such as Asperger's/Neurotypical/Autism/Banana.
I was just simply giving my opinion about who to categorize in consideration with what men/women want. As an autistic you cannot fully comprehend the mechanics of certain human nature and interaction. So you go off topic(As usual) and start to argue with yourself about jargon. It doesn't make you more intelligent than me, nor does it make you a great philosopher; it just makes you argue with yourself about nothing.



You forget that you were the one who attacked me.



This sentence merely supports my claim that most autistics have a HUGE ego.



Who are you attacking? Do you even comprehend what you are writing down onto the forum? You are clearly arguing with yourself. You are completely confused about the context of the argument so you make up your own argument.

How exactly am I suppose to comprehend an argument that you made up and then started to argue with yourself about? Am I suppose to argue against an imaginary argument and pretend that you are right and that I am wrong?



This is a mere illusion. Writing random crap(Yes, crap) in the middle of an argument or a debate is not a form of proper arguing. You seem to have a superiority complex which makes you believe that what you are writing is always right and you then take this thought and delude yourself into thinking that you are special and of superior intellect.

This may be due to the result that you are autistic or it may be to a moderate case of narcissism. I really can't tell the difference but it is not my job to make sense of all your ranting.



I don't even view this as comical. The simple fact that you like to argue with yourself with statements like "A means B. But B does not relate to C. And C does not relate to A" makes you sound more and more like a crazy person.

I don't think I am the most intelligent person ever and I don't think I'm smart because I attend the University of Michigan(I never cared much about the rankings anyway).

But what you write is just blasphemy. It has very little rational thought beyond "If I connect two triangles together I could make a square so therefore you argument is wrong and I win." It is like arguing with a 5 year old.



Yes yes; I am the one who is delusional.



I'm learning something new already.



Now don't the "z's" make everything look better? I know they do.



An autistic is making a stand alone statement about what society thinks? Obviously I must be wrong.



I'll take it in literal meanings that you are not going anywhere.



No, I haven't yet picked out the article on wikipedia that proves I understand exactly how neurotypicals think. Maybe I will try again later.



Did you forget who you think is the smart one?



It depends on the situation. Obviously I will universalize that the women at the bar and taking down 6-7 cans of beer is putting herself at risk. The same way of reasoning can be applied to many different situations.




In your situation there is probably very little that can be done. I'm not talking about nor targeting autistics so maybe it would be wise to get the reasoning factor outside the number one.



I believe you can answer your own question.



If you universalize the world into a one dimensional reality then you have a flawed set of principles. One that cannot understand a viewpoint beyond his own should not try and claim to be an expert on debating.



This is just awesome. Not only do you use an article found on wikipedia to defend your "argument" but you also go along and make up your own subject matter. A true sign of an expert debater in your own little world.



Just like high school debate taught you how to begin with the sentence "This misquoting." It must have been brilliant.



I rather study economics and accounting. I don't want to become a shrink.



All neurotypicals are inconsistent buffoons. You got me.



A great philosopher. Destined to change the world.



Exactly! I am the ignorant one. I should just go and make up some new arguments and then argue with myself for hours upon end because I am so ignorant.



Coming from you I find this comical. Think what you will.



Clearly you have me fooled.



You break the stereotype.



Of course you are. A five year old never appears to others as egotistical or arrogant. At least not in your world.



Give it 1000 years and anything can happen



I hope this one isn't imaginary too. Making things up just isn't your style.

.