techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Nah, its just the opposite - they care a lot more about attainment of male gender roll, good social skills, $$, protector status, etc.; so being an aspie and being good looking, as a guy, is worth about as much as a girl being 300 lbs and being a black belt in tae kwon do or making over 100k a year.
This is absolutely true, and all there is to say about the topic.
Some individual variation does exist, of course:
Some women admire rednecks with good social skills, and some women admire intellectuals with good social skills.
Some women admire Republicans with good social skills, and some women admire Marxists with good social skills.
Some women admire ruthless entrepreneurs with good social skills, and some women admire environmental activists with good social skills.
Some women admire violent men with good social skills, that's what facilitates financing the feminist "battered women" industry, and some women admire pacifists with good social skills.
Why do you think they call them "social skills?" Duh.
_________________
They murdered boys in Mississippi. They shot Medgar in the back.
Did you say that wasn't proper? Did you march out on the track?
You were quiet, just like mice. And now you say that we're not nice.
Well thank you buddy for your advice...
-Malvina