What is "creepy"?
Because "creepy" doesn't mean "I know for sure this person is a rapist/murderer/steals strangers pantyhose to jerk off in them"
it means "this person makes me uncomfortable" and usually "this person crossed a boundary of mine"
No one has a right to my body, my attention, or my good opinion that I am violating by not providing
Assault is only relevant because Women who aren't vigilant in this way are blamed for their assault if it does happen. It's about minimizing risk but it's also about minimizing culpability.
This whole thing just seems like policing women's rejection. Our "no"s aren't acceptable unless we use the right vocabulary.
I don't need to make a case beyond a reasonable doubt to the council of man feelings before I decide to frown at the guy on the street telling me how pretty I'd be if I smiled (dance monkey dance) or before I think he's a creep.
And what about the guys who get labelled creepy without having actually done anything wrong? What about the women who make a point of treating every man rudely, just for sharing a gender with most rapists? I mean, clearly that does happen, some of those women have posted in this very thread.
I said very clearly that I do not have a problem with women acting cautiously. Nor do I have a problem with calling guys creepy who actually do creepy things. But there are a lot of guys being called that, being treated as likely predators, whose only sin was being male.
_________________
If life's not beautiful without the pain,
well I'd just rather never ever even see beauty again.
Well as life gets longer, awful feels softer.
And it feels pretty soft to me.
Modest Mouse - The View
MXH
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ab2f/5ab2f6ed6ac2cec30195fa77cd27f3987c52d67f" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain
MXH
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ab2f/5ab2f6ed6ac2cec30195fa77cd27f3987c52d67f" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain
I said very clearly that I do not have a problem with women acting cautiously. Nor do I have a problem with calling guys creepy who actually do creepy things. But there are a lot of guys being called that, being treated as likely predators, whose only sin was being male.
exactly. Theres nothing wrong with being cautious, or prepared. But there is plenty wrong on treating everyone rudely with hate who has done nothing to deserve it besides being a gender.
And because i know the next thing yall will say is about how women are always victims. You remmeber that group of pretty killers I posted? There was more to picking them than just saying they are good looking. It was to show that they can be good looking, male or female, and can go for targets of either genders. But again, its easier to play single handed victim. Lets consider one of the bigger news this year with the whole deblacle in penn state. Where for YEARS nobody dared speak out about 40+ male victims. So dont pretend its just women that have to watch their backs. I have 3 MALE family members and 6 male friends who have been sexually abused in their lives. I actually know more sexually abused men than women. That doesnt mean the pain is any less for either, but if you're to play victim to justify negative thoughts on a gender atleast play the role right
can someone point me to where any member on this forum has ever stated that every man should be treated or labeled as a creep? it is no possible to have an open and honest dialogue when people are being accused of behaving in a way that there is no factual basis for concluding. some members are deciding that some female members behave a certain way when there is no basis for concluding such. demonising members based on nonsense is also unfair discrimination, so practice what you preach
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
spongy
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc2d1/bc2d16b0836f18a782ccab69e8269d4e5cbc11a9" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,055
Location: Patiently waiting for the seventh wave
There is a member that just stated that whenever she goes hiking she labels every man as a creep about three pages ago.
Its been multiquoted by several people and its what some members have been discussing since then
Because "creepy" doesn't mean "I know for sure this person is a rapist/murderer/steals strangers pantyhose to jerk off in them"
it means "this person makes me uncomfortable" and usually "this person crossed a boundary of mine"
No one has a right to my body, my attention, or my good opinion that I am violating by not providing
Assault is only relevant because Women who aren't vigilant in this way are blamed for their assault if it does happen. It's about minimizing risk but it's also about minimizing culpability.
This whole thing just seems like policing women's rejection. Our "no"s aren't acceptable unless we use the right vocabulary.
I don't need to make a case beyond a reasonable doubt to the council of man feelings before I decide to frown at the guy on the street telling me how pretty I'd be if I smiled (dance monkey dance) or before I think he's a creep.
And what about the guys who get labelled creepy without having actually done anything wrong? What about the women who make a point of treating every man rudely, just for sharing a gender with most rapists? I mean, clearly that does happen, some of those women have posted in this very thread.
I said very clearly that I do not have a problem with women acting cautiously. Nor do I have a problem with calling guys creepy who actually do creepy things. But there are a lot of guys being called that, being treated as likely predators, whose only sin was being male.
Ok, I think I see the disconnect here in what we're saying.
The issue is guys getting called creepy when they aren't actually creepy. But...
There isn't some set standard to creepiness that someone either meets or doesn't meet. There are no objective criteria, it's a subjective assessment. What creeps one person out might not creep another person out, people have different boundaries. So one person might be okay with someone touching their hair and complimenting it, in that instance, not creepy. I would not be okay with that and if someone did it t me I would feel creeped out and so they would have been creepy.
Saying someone creeped you out is a declaration of a feeling you had, people with different boundaries might disagree with you about the creepiness of the action, but you still felt creeped out.
You can't know what's upsetting to another person, because the is no objective standard for "creepy" you can't really tell people "that feeling you feel is wrong because if I was in your situation I wouldn't have that feeling"
So I agree that mislabeling someone is wrong, but I don't think there is a way for anyone but the person expressing the feeling to know how accurate it is or is not.
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
There is a member that just stated that whenever she goes hiking she labels every man as a creep about three pages ago.
Its been multiquoted by several people and its what some members have been discussing since then
eh
There is a difference between "all men" and "all men who try to engage me when I am alone in an isolated location"
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
spongy
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc2d1/bc2d16b0836f18a782ccab69e8269d4e5cbc11a9" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,055
Location: Patiently waiting for the seventh wave
There is a member that just stated that whenever she goes hiking she labels every man as a creep about three pages ago.
Its been multiquoted by several people and its what some members have been discussing since then
eh
There is a difference between "all men" and "all men who try to engage me when I am alone in an isolated location"
Not sure if you have noticed but members here seem to jump to semi-related topics quite frequently without meaning any harm(it happens in every section and just about any topic) I was just pointing her out how it started.
You can't know what's upsetting to another person, because the is no objective standard for "creepy" you can't really tell people "that feeling you feel is wrong because if I was in your situation I wouldn't have that feeling"
See that's the part I disagree with. Saying that someone creeped you out, and that they are thus creepy, implies that the person has done something objectively wrong.
Saying "I am uncomfortable when I find myself alone with a man I do not know" gets the point across without placing blame on the (most likely completely innocent) other person.
I am not arguing that women are not entitled to their feelings. I am arguing that they should not shift the responsibility for those feelings onto other people.
_________________
If life's not beautiful without the pain,
well I'd just rather never ever even see beauty again.
Well as life gets longer, awful feels softer.
And it feels pretty soft to me.
Modest Mouse - The View
I know it's an unfair/untrue stereotype about men though. You've never heard it before?
There is a member that just stated that whenever she goes hiking she labels every man as a creep about three pages ago.
Its been multiquoted by several people and its what some members have been discussing since then
eh
There is a difference between "all men" and "all men who try to engage me when I am alone in an isolated location"
Not sure if you have noticed but members here seem to jump to semi-related topics quite frequently without meaning any harm(it happens in every section and just about any topic) I was just pointing her out how it started.
I do agree with you that that's the post people are probably thinking of when they claim there are women on this forum who are just terrible to "all men".
I was just stating why that's a flawed interpretation of what she wrote.
Nothing on you.
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
There is a member that just stated that whenever she goes hiking she labels every man as a creep about three pages ago.
Its been multiquoted by several people and its what some members have been discussing since then
except that she didn't say that:
looking at people cautiously is not labeling them as creeps. there is a big distinction between those two ideas.
she took one single situation where she is generally cautious and said that IF people behave a certain way, then she reacts to it. there is no logical way to draw the conclusion that she labels ALL men as creeps from that situation.
it's like there is a chasm between what people are saying an d the conclusions that other members are drawing.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
I know it's an unfair/untrue stereotype about men though. You've never heard it before?
sure i've heard it before, and it is definitely unfair. but that has nothing to do with being labeled "creepy", and if you decide that someone who says that "all men watch porn" must label "all men are creepy", it does not make logical sense (and it is equally unfair)
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
You can't know what's upsetting to another person, because the is no objective standard for "creepy" you can't really tell people "that feeling you feel is wrong because if I was in your situation I wouldn't have that feeling"
See that's the part I disagree with. Saying that someone creeped you out, and that they are thus creepy, implies that the person has done something objectively wrong.
Saying "I am uncomfortable when I find myself alone with a man I do not know" gets the point across without placing blame on the (most likely completely innocent) other person.
I am not arguing that women are not entitled to their feelings. I am arguing that they should not shift the responsibility for those feelings onto other people.
Creepy is a descriptor, much like, pretty or ugly or hot that is in the eye of the beholder.
If I say a guy is hot do I have to have evidence that other people would agree with to support that claim? Is it okay for me to think someone is beautiful without other people thinking they are beautiful or the person themselves realizing they are beautiful? Those are judgements very much based on my feelings and who I am as a person not objective action either right or wrong.
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.