What type of girl do you not want?

Page 14 of 20 [ 317 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 20  Next

puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

04 Sep 2012, 12:49 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
--Asexual
--Saving herself until marriage
--thinks oral sex is evil
--not Christian or Jewish
--hates traveling
--doesn't want kids


QFT. Allthough being muslim wouldn't be a red flag to me.


Muslims usually think oral sex is evil, because it doesn't result in procreation.


Didn't you used to have a much tighter list? For example, having to watch the same cartoons as you? Are your standards loosening as you get older?


I thought that was his 'ideal' list. The DO NOT WANT list only includes things that are deal breakers.


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

04 Sep 2012, 12:56 pm

yellowtamarin wrote:
Solvejg wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
*stupid
*has an annoying voice or an annoying laugh
*always dieting
*self-righteous
*is very politically correct
*I don't like facial hair on women, though I have it myself (I pluck it out)
*snorts cocaine
*smokes and doesn't moisturise so has premature ageing
*is really happy and extroverted all the time
*is really aloof and 'too cool for school' all the time
*likes men a lot more than women
*does things men do, like read FHM and go to strip clubs because they think it gives them homo chic, or something
*is really certain about everything
*is really, really into the paranormal or the occult (I mean, there are limits to how seriously people should take that stuff)
*is way out of my league
*is heavily into BDSM
*has Borderline Personality Disorder or Antisocial PD
*is a narcissist
*does random antisocial acts that serve no purpose, like spitting on the floor or running red lights


ah we will never date. :P

I think I pass all that criteria, but for some reason by looking at it I don't feel like I would be puddingmouse's type anyway. Not really sure how that works!!


I don't think I'm many people's type, tbh. I'm weird without being 'alternative'.

That list made me sound demanding/judgemental. I'm not. I'm quite easy-going. A woman who gobs on the floor and goes to strip clubs or seances can still be friends with me. :P


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


Last edited by puddingmouse on 04 Sep 2012, 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

TM
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,122

04 Sep 2012, 12:59 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
TM wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
^^^ A bit harshly-worded.... but accurate.

Some of these gals demand someone they can make their *subordinate*.


You haven't noticed that WP.net women by large are undatable? In the cost benefit analysis most of them come off as "Not offering enough to balance out with the list of demands" I suspect the elevated sense of self-value comes from being mainly on a forum where men outnumber women and where a large number of desperate men gas them up, to the point where they forget that they're like 3s and 4s at best.

no, men don't outnumber women here. there is a roughly equal proportion of men and women on WrongPlanet.


What are you basing that on? Do you have access to the actual membership statistics or are you using the threads in the statistics forum where less than 0.5% of total members have voted in the polls? Considering that the statistical ratio of autism and Asperger's is something like 4:1 it would be rather strange if there was an even number of members.

Regardless, it doesn't change the "gassing up" bit.



JNathanK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,177

04 Sep 2012, 2:37 pm

I don't think I have a set list to be honest. If I feel it, then I'll roll with it.



Sextaesada
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,522

04 Sep 2012, 4:05 pm

JNathanK wrote:
I don't think I have a set list to be honest. If I feel it, then I'll roll with it.

same here, but I did write something down that might be a problem. but if they are interesting or attractive enough I'm not going to turn them down. :lol:


_________________
Woh! Clash! Into the rolling morning
Flash! I'm in the coolest driver's high


GiantHockeyFan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,293

04 Sep 2012, 5:23 pm

OliveOilMom wrote:
Quite a few women like tall guys because they are assuming that everything is in proportion, if you know what I mean. ;-)


LOL good point. I have many long body parts: legs, arms, fingers as well as certain body parts I only have one of. I just don't get the chance to get that far to show it thanks to being hopelessly oblivious. To put it politely, I have very positive qualities that nobody has yet to see.

Sextaesada wrote:
I like tall girls, I don't like tall guys. the big ones scare me...

I have recently clued into that within the past few weeks. I'm 6'6", 210 lbs and tend to stand very close to people being a little hard of hearing and my troubles hearing people over the background noise. I guess I never saw that as intimidating because of how much I was bullied growing up and if anything assumed everyone saw me as a wimp. I might look big and tough but until recently I was weak as a kitten. I was even nicknamed Mr. Burns in school because I was so physically weak and tight with money.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

04 Sep 2012, 7:44 pm

TM wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
TM wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
^^^ A bit harshly-worded.... but accurate.

Some of these gals demand someone they can make their *subordinate*.


You haven't noticed that WP.net women by large are undatable? In the cost benefit analysis most of them come off as "Not offering enough to balance out with the list of demands" I suspect the elevated sense of self-value comes from being mainly on a forum where men outnumber women and where a large number of desperate men gas them up, to the point where they forget that they're like 3s and 4s at best.

no, men don't outnumber women here. there is a roughly equal proportion of men and women on WrongPlanet.


What are you basing that on? Do you have access to the actual membership statistics or are you using the threads in the statistics forum where less than 0.5% of total members have voted in the polls? Considering that the statistical ratio of autism and Asperger's is something like 4:1 it would be rather strange if there was an even number of members.

Regardless, it doesn't change the "gassing up" bit.

i did the calculations based on a significant sample size. you have the freedom to do the same.

nobody is "gassing" anyone up. some men here like the women they are interacting with. just because you can't see it doesn't make it untrue for them. be careful where you are going with that.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


SickInDaHead
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 215

04 Sep 2012, 9:51 pm

To a question that is the thread topic I would say "Don't get me started".



yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

05 Sep 2012, 1:37 am

GiantHockeyFan wrote:
The biggest thing I forgot to mention:
I don't want someone who is ONLY interested in me solely because of my height (i.e. almost every girl I meet). I find that rather insulting as it's something I have zero control over as opposed to my other nice qualities I have spent a lot of time and energy working on.

It's weird, the female obsession with tall guys. Anything over about 6'2 creates too much of a difference in height for me. I like around 5'9 - 5'11. But yeah, a good friend of mine would be gushing over your 6'6!



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

05 Sep 2012, 1:45 am

yellowtamarin wrote:
GiantHockeyFan wrote:
The biggest thing I forgot to mention:
I don't want someone who is ONLY interested in me solely because of my height (i.e. almost every girl I meet). I find that rather insulting as it's something I have zero control over as opposed to my other nice qualities I have spent a lot of time and energy working on.

It's weird, the female obsession with tall guys. Anything over about 6'2 creates too much of a difference in height for me. I like around 5'9 - 5'11. But yeah, a good friend of mine would be gushing over your 6'6!

yeah, i know what you mean. although women purportedly like tall men, some tall men don't like the attention they get by default.

GiantHockeyFan, i understand what you mean - i prefer to be primarily noticed for the things i can do as opposed to how i appear. i'd like to ALSO be considered attractive to the person that i like, but as part of a package where a defining physical feature is not the focus.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

05 Sep 2012, 2:29 am

hyperlexian wrote:
GiantHockeyFan, i understand what you mean - i prefer to be primarily noticed for the things i can do as opposed to how i appear. i'd like to ALSO be considered attractive to the person that i like, but as part of a package where a defining physical feature is not the focus.

Hear, hear. Though I'd add "the way I think" as what I'd like to be noticed for, just as much as the things I can do.



ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw

05 Sep 2012, 2:37 am

I'm just trying to think of why someone would presume
WP users derive their sense of self-worth ("elevated" or no) from whether this-or-that demographic they belong to is proportionately-represented on an INTERNET FORUM.


:lol:


_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."


meems
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,869

05 Sep 2012, 5:25 am

ValentineWiggin wrote:
I'm just trying to think of why someone would presume
WP users derive their sense of self-worth ("elevated" or no) from whether this-or-that demographic they belong to is proportionately-represented on an INTERNET FORUM.


:lol:


Because the ladygirls of WrongPlanet are not extant on the RealPlanet. We are simply objects on a forum, not real humanthings.

It says it in a book somewhere!



Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

05 Sep 2012, 5:33 am

^^^
I have to admit - the very concept makes me laugh - really hard! :lol:


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


meems
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,869

05 Sep 2012, 5:35 am

I am a malfunctioning ladygirl because my sense of self worth is not dependent on my rating on this scale I am somewhat unfamiliar with. And I never realized I'm supposed to behave a certain way based on how I'm rated on the mystery man-scale.

It's probably because I spend too much time not being much of a heterosexual.

Also because I have no sense of my rating on the scale or what it means to other people, because I guess it means very little to me. I don't view myself as an object, it's difficult to do that.



sunshower
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Age: 124
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,985

05 Sep 2012, 6:50 am

TM wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
TM wrote:
BlueMax wrote:
^^^ A bit harshly-worded.... but accurate.

Some of these gals demand someone they can make their *subordinate*.


You haven't noticed that WP.net women by large are undatable? In the cost benefit analysis most of them come off as "Not offering enough to balance out with the list of demands" I suspect the elevated sense of self-value comes from being mainly on a forum where men outnumber women and where a large number of desperate men gas them up, to the point where they forget that they're like 3s and 4s at best.

no, men don't outnumber women here. there is a roughly equal proportion of men and women on WrongPlanet.


What are you basing that on? Do you have access to the actual membership statistics or are you using the threads in the statistics forum where less than 0.5% of total members have voted in the polls? Considering that the statistical ratio of autism and Asperger's is something like 4:1 it would be rather strange if there was an even number of members.

Regardless, it doesn't change the "gassing up" bit.


Damn us "3's and 4's", ruining everything, refusing to date wonderful men such as yourself who clearly see women as more than objects whose worth can be summarized in full to a number on a rating scale of 1 to 10, when we're just as clearly on this website to desperately search for a man - because why else would we be posting here, on an Autism and Asperger's support forum as opposed to the hundreds of online dating sites we could alternatively be frequenting? I mean, golly!


_________________
Into the dark...