aussiebloke wrote:
Well their birds so they would be of no use to you, though they do seem to like porn and who doesn't
, not that I condone beastuality or than again perhaps I do I may research it and than come to a conclusion , than again not how can you rob a pet of their innocence ?
I agree. Just out of curiosity, what type of birds? It was the one pet I was not allowed to have as a child.. my mother claimed to have an allergy -- even though I learned later on in life that as a teen my mum worked in a chicken house collecting eggs. So the little white lie was clearly just a way of keeping my personal pet poulation down.
factotum666 wrote:
Given that people in this forum are, for the most part, outside of the middle of a lot of normal distributions, it is still amazing how many people speak/write in diet mode when speaking of the general populace, and for some reason assume that that populace is either just like them, or not at all like themselves. The fact is that the statements "we are all unique", and we are all basically alike, both fall into the category of "not even wrong" (do a search of the phrase if it is not familiar) Or maybe more accurately, both phrases are both true and false, and thus without meaning.
I am referencing the statement: A humble guy is far more attractive than one with an ego. So reality might rate you a fair amount higher on that grading scale than you do yourself. I hope the pets thing isn't something kinky.. or I might have to steal your pets. I could give dozens of reasons why this statement is often true and false. By evolution, women, especially when fertile, tend to be attracted towards power and status. Often they will find a humble person attractive, then leave later having decided that anyone who wants them must be a looser. Sort a version of "I would not want to join a club that would have me as a member". A few competent women really do appreciate men who are not suffering from testosterone poisoning, but they are not all that common.
In any case, as I have written elsewhere, all generalizations are false, including this one.
For those who are interested, look up deity mode and e-prime. I think that most in this form will find the e-prime topic to be of interest.
It always makes me happy to bring someone out of the box. Thanks for sharing your view. Most of my posts go ignored. To see someone put so much thought into a response is very kind.