Would you dump someone who got fat?

Page 17 of 26 [ 416 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 26  Next

Delphiki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Age: 182
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,415
Location: My own version of reality

12 May 2012, 11:30 pm

rabbittss wrote:
Delphiki wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
But. There. Is. Something. Wrong. With. Them.



Just like there is something wrong with me and you or we wouldn't be on this website.

no, there is nothing wrong with obese people. some have health issues and some do not, but by default there isn't anything wrong with them.


I think the CDC would beg to differ. There is a reason its called an obesity 'Epidemic'.


Autism is an 'Epidemic' :P
http://www.autismspeaks.org/science/sci ... rises-1-88


Yup, sure is, which is why we need to find the source of it. It could be that we are simply diagnosing more and more people with it because we don't know what to do with them otherwise.. It could be environmental, it could be chemical, it could be any number of things. But the fact that the number of people who have it are increasing.. is a cause for alarm.

Oh jeez, because more people are aware of autism and it is being diagnosed more that does not equal more people have it.


_________________
Well you can go with that if you want.


mds_02
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,077
Location: Los Angeles

12 May 2012, 11:30 pm

edgewaters wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
Can you please tell me how one would go about that. The idea that someone could choose to be attracted to something that previously they found unappealing is baffling to me. I can't wrap my head around the concept.


Well, think of it this way. What would you say to someone who went around making shopping decisions based completely on the packaging, and apparently being incapable of grasping that he should be buying the corn flakes, not the box they come in?

And what would you think of such a person if we lived in a future where the packaging changed over time? :lol:


Physical attractiveness does not determine a person's objective worth (as if such a thing could be determined). But it does affect, in a subjective way (which doesn't necessarily mean changeable), one's level of sexual satisfaction which, to me, is an essential aspect of a healthy romantic relationship. The packaging on the cereal doesn't matter only because sex isn't an integral part of the cornflake experience.

Unless I've been severely misinformed as to what constitutes a balanced breakfast.


_________________
If life's not beautiful without the pain, 
well I'd just rather never ever even see beauty again. 
Well as life gets longer, awful feels softer. 
And it feels pretty soft to me. 

Modest Mouse - The View


rabbittss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,348

12 May 2012, 11:31 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
But. There. Is. Something. Wrong. With. Them.



Just like there is something wrong with me and you or we wouldn't be on this website.

no, there is nothing wrong with obese people. some have health issues and some do not, but by default there isn't anything wrong with them.


I think the CDC would beg to differ. There is a reason its called an obesity 'Epidemic'.

25 to 30% of people who are obese are as healthy as thin people, therefore there is no reason for them to lose weight. they do not have a disease and nothing is wrong with them.



According to the CDC, 35% of American Adults is obese. along with 17% of children.

Total population is 313,370,000,
Roughly 80% of Americans are "Adults" and 20% are children.

313,370,000 x .80 = 250696000
250696000 x .35= 87743600
You can then further remove the 25-30% of those who are obese but not "Unhealthy". Granted, it's only an estimate, but what about the other 60 million who ARE unhealthy? When something like 1/5th of the total population is not only obese, but also unhealthy, you have a serious problem.

And thats just the adults.

it doesn't matter. if 25 to 30% of people do not have any problems with blood sugar or their pancreas (or other symptoms), then they do not have a disease. just like if you have no symptoms of AS, you do not have the disorder.

it is only a disease if it negatively affects health.


So the only disease related to being overweight is Diabetes? Blood Clots, gastro-intestinal distress, bad backs from carrying the extra weight, muscle strain, respiratory distress, etc etc etc don't count then I suppose?



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

12 May 2012, 11:31 pm

1000Knives wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
1000Knives wrote:
My dating criteria for women is about 27-28 BMI (BMI is dumb, but yes) and about 30% bodyfat. I think I'm being reasonable, as I'm about 17-20% BF, and women get an extra 10% as if they drop to 10% they stop menstruating.

If my partner became fat, if it was at the same rate as me, I wouldn't care. Basically, I'd expect of her equivalence to myself. As far as if we're married, you know, the vows are "in sickness and in health" and fatness is a sickness, so yeah. You know, I'd be stuck then. I certainly wouldn't be happy with it, and I'd try to encourage exercise and dieting and stuff, but if that's no go, then...no go, I gotta suck it up and live with it. I do plan on marrying, though, and not just living with my girlfriend and having kids like it seems most people do nowadays, due to the collapse of American society.

As far as a girlfriend, though... I'm pretty active of a person, and basically I'm so vested into my athletic hobbies that normal people basically think I'm nuts. So I think that'd be an obstacle to a lot of relationships for me. Everyone in my house thinks I'm weird for being at all nutritionally or exercise conscious. So I'm assuming most other people would think the same. So even if a girl who played WoW and ate Cheetos 18 hours a day was initially attracted to me, I don't think it'd work as it'd just be a hobby/interest clash. They'd have to be at the very least tolerant of my health consciousness, and I can't imagine too many girls who'd be tolerant toward my skating, gym going, and homecooking if they weren't already doing something similar.

Since my weight has fluctuated in life, being sorta "fat" for a lot of my adolescence into adulthood, I know what the reasons are behind people getting fat, and I know how hard losing weight is, so I'm empathetic to a point, but if people can't be bothered to try to live a healthy life, you know, I can't "make" them. The other thing, too, I've seen girls who are sorta "fat" but are still athletic as all hell, a girl like that I'd probably get along with more than a skinnyfat party girl who once she hits 35 will turn into a blob.

I think, though, if I was married, and about 40 years old or so, and wasn't skating anymore, and Godwilling my body still works correctly, I'd just eat like mad and go into heavyweight or superheavyweight class in powerlifting or Olympic lifting. That'd be sweet. I don't wanna look like that at 20, as that'd just suck, but if you're 40 or 50 or so, hey, the wife is stuck with you, you know? Women, would you be pissed if your man decided to look like this at age 40 for the sake of picking heavy things up and putting them down?
Image

so you want to have a thin wife and yet get fat in order to do powerlifting when you get older?


Eh, I was sorta saying that hypothetically/joking. I can't say for sure what I'll be doing in that amount of time, if I'll even be around, or be married, who knows. But, to answer your question, that'd be kinda fun, yeah. I don't know, skating is a good reason to not do that, and I enjoy skating more than picking up heavy stuff, so yeah, probably won't happen.

And I didn't specify "skinny" I basically specified not obese. http://static.superskinnyme.com/blog/wp ... omen21.jpg 30% is quite a reasonable expectation.

you're correct i should not have said "thin". sorry, misunderstood.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

12 May 2012, 11:33 pm

I love fat girls. I wanna be totally smotherd while we are enjoying each others company, :pig:



rabbittss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,348

12 May 2012, 11:34 pm

Delphiki wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
Delphiki wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
But. There. Is. Something. Wrong. With. Them.



Just like there is something wrong with me and you or we wouldn't be on this website.

no, there is nothing wrong with obese people. some have health issues and some do not, but by default there isn't anything wrong with them.


I think the CDC would beg to differ. There is a reason its called an obesity 'Epidemic'.


Autism is an 'Epidemic' :P
http://www.autismspeaks.org/science/sci ... rises-1-88


Yup, sure is, which is why we need to find the source of it. It could be that we are simply diagnosing more and more people with it because we don't know what to do with them otherwise.. It could be environmental, it could be chemical, it could be any number of things. But the fact that the number of people who have it are increasing.. is a cause for alarm.

Oh jeez, because more people are aware of autism and it is being diagnosed more that does not equal more people have it.


Same effect, different cause. the % of the population who is on spectrum is increasing in quantity. If it's simply that doctors are widening their definition, that is also an acceptable reason for the increase.

The trick is with Autism, unless it is really severe, it can be hard to detect, unlike obesity.



IlovemyAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2012
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,030
Location: Alone

12 May 2012, 11:34 pm

1000Knives wrote:
edgewaters wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
Can you please tell me how one would go about that. The idea that someone could choose to be attracted to something that previously they found unappealing is baffling to me. I can't wrap my head around the concept.


Well, think of it this way. What would you say to someone who went around making shopping decisions based completely on the packaging, and apparently being incapable of grasping that he should be buying the corn flakes, not the box they come in?

And what would you think of such a person if we lived in a future where the packaging changed over time? :lol:


The problem is, your body is not just a container for your brain. It is just as much a part of you as your brain is. Your body's condition affects how your brain works, and vice versa, it can be a vicious cycle, but to put it simply, if you're skinny and in shape, especially nowadays, it generally means you have a thing called discipline and control over yourself, which is a desirable (though sometimes boring) trait in all human beings.


Wow being skinny is a desirable trait in all human beings? Boy am I glad my guy thinks I'm fine just the way I am. Even though I am considered obese by medical standards he still finds me desirable. What a concept! Not bad for a woman with no discipline or control over herself!



1000Knives
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,036
Location: CT, USA

12 May 2012, 11:39 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
ok, here is a further question. if a fat person is strong and healthy (with no health problems whatsoever), why don't you WANT to find them attractive? (anyone can answer)


OK, to answer your powerlifting question. There you go, that's the answer. Strong and healthy. Just huge. But, usually it's not the norm. Usually fat means "lazy" not "I wanna be as strong as the Hulk." Image

Jang Mi-Ran is a female Olympic lifter, yep, she's fat, but she's strong as all hell. As far as me personally, if I met someone like that, I'd possibly put the looks aside. There. But, since we're speaking generalities here, yeah...

EDIT, also too, most of those superheavyweight people once they stop being competitive do diet down.



Last edited by 1000Knives on 12 May 2012, 11:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

12 May 2012, 11:40 pm

rabbittss wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
But. There. Is. Something. Wrong. With. Them.



Just like there is something wrong with me and you or we wouldn't be on this website.

no, there is nothing wrong with obese people. some have health issues and some do not, but by default there isn't anything wrong with them.


I think the CDC would beg to differ. There is a reason its called an obesity 'Epidemic'.

25 to 30% of people who are obese are as healthy as thin people, therefore there is no reason for them to lose weight. they do not have a disease and nothing is wrong with them.



According to the CDC, 35% of American Adults is obese. along with 17% of children.

Total population is 313,370,000,
Roughly 80% of Americans are "Adults" and 20% are children.

313,370,000 x .80 = 250696000
250696000 x .35= 87743600
You can then further remove the 25-30% of those who are obese but not "Unhealthy". Granted, it's only an estimate, but what about the other 60 million who ARE unhealthy? When something like 1/5th of the total population is not only obese, but also unhealthy, you have a serious problem.

And thats just the adults.

it doesn't matter. if 25 to 30% of people do not have any problems with blood sugar or their pancreas (or other symptoms), then they do not have a disease. just like if you have no symptoms of AS, you do not have the disorder.

it is only a disease if it negatively affects health.


So the only disease related to being overweight is Diabetes? Blood Clots, gastro-intestinal distress, bad backs from carrying the extra weight, muscle strain, respiratory distress, etc etc etc don't count then I suppose?

no, i was using diabetes as a totally separate example of a disease that you cannot have without symptoms. you can insert cancer, lupus, or anything else in there.

the studies showed that some people did not suffer from ANY obesity-related health problems in spite of being fat. it is called the "obesity paradox" and i would advise you to look it up.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


rabbittss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,348

12 May 2012, 11:40 pm

I'd say what I thought of that girl's photo, but I'm to afraid she would snap me apart like a kit kat and eat me.



edgewaters
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,427
Location: Ontario

12 May 2012, 11:41 pm

1000Knives wrote:
edgewaters wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
Can you please tell me how one would go about that. The idea that someone could choose to be attracted to something that previously they found unappealing is baffling to me. I can't wrap my head around the concept.


Well, think of it this way. What would you say to someone who went around making shopping decisions based completely on the packaging, and apparently being incapable of grasping that he should be buying the corn flakes, not the box they come in?

And what would you think of such a person if we lived in a future where the packaging changed over time? :lol:


The problem is, your body is not just a container for your brain. It is just as much a part of you as your brain is. Your body's condition affects how your brain works, and vice versa, it can be a vicious cycle, but to put it simply, if you're skinny and in shape, especially nowadays, it generally means you have a thing called discipline and control over yourself, which is a desirable (though sometimes boring) trait in all human beings.


It's not really rational to look at anything other than what IS, in a given case. If being fit helps improve alertness and mental functioning, but you have an overweight genius - in this case, the former is 100% irrelevant because it has not caused a deficit relative to the average.

You're trying to rationalize overvaluing outward appearance, and I have to say so far its not convincing. In the real world - personality plays a massive role in attractiveness and suitability. Disregarding this fact is conducive to, well, really crappy experiences with partners. It doesn't surprise me that so many people are so frustrated.



rabbittss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,348

12 May 2012, 11:42 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
no, i was using diabetes as a totally separate example of a disease that you cannot have without symptoms. you can insert cancer, lupus, or anything else in there.

the studies showed that some people did not suffer from ANY obesity-related health problems in spite of being fat. it is called the "obesity paradox" and i would advise you to look it up.


but it doesn't change the fact that is only 25-30%, between 1/4th and 1/3rd of the 87million people who are obese in America. That means, if 25-30% have no illness related to being obese.. the other 70-75% do! Otherwise the percentage who had no disease would be higher.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

12 May 2012, 11:43 pm

before i forget, one interesting detail about some obese people who are as healthy as normal-weight people.... is that some of them suffer ill effects if they lose weight (in a healthy manner supervised by nutritionists, naturally). so they are actually healthier when obese then they are thin. it's food for thought that people need to let go of the judgements. some people are better off fat.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


rabbittss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,348

12 May 2012, 11:44 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
before i forget, one interesting detail about some obese people who are as healthy as normal-weight people.... is that some of them suffer ill effects if they lose weight (in a healthy manner supervised by nutritionists, naturally). so they are actually healthier when obese then they are thin. it's food for thought that people need to let go of the judgements. some people are better off fat.


Doesn't change the fact I still find them horrid to look at. Don't mind me though, I also find Picasso and Jackson Pollock horrid to look at.. but others find a great deal of meaning in their work.



mds_02
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,077
Location: Los Angeles

12 May 2012, 11:46 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
you would realise that ahead of time though.


Well, no. There's actually been plenty of times that I didn't realize until too late that a woman did not actually have the other qualities I was looking for.

Quote:
we are talking about someone that you must be compatible with already, so you would be leaving them because they are fat. that is really sad to me. it makes the whole relationship hang on something physical.


Being a bit more frank about it, are you saying that I should give up, for the rest of my life, the possibility of having a fulfilling sex life? Because that's what I'd be doing by choosing to stay with someone I was no longer physically attracted to.

And bear in mind here, even if we may disagree about what others were talking about, that I've already established that I'm not talking about weight gain from pregnancy, or getting older, or anything that is out of her control. Nor am I talking about expecting her to meet some ridiculous, media inspired standard. I am talking about a partner who allows herself, through negligence, to go through a dramatic change that she knows I find unappealing. One who, when concerns are expressed and help is offered, chooses to remain on the same course.

you don't have to stick to that ideal though. there is no reason not to become more openminded and appreciate fatter women.


How?

I mean concrete "this is how you do it" steps to make my body respond in a physically positive manner to someone it would not have responded to before.

I'm trying very hard not to be crude about it, but I'm not just talking about realizing that people I am not attracted to have positive qualities. I already realize that. But those qualities are seperate from sexual attraction, which is, for me, an essential part of a romantic relationship.

And in answer to your later question (sorry, quoting multiple posts on an iPad is more hassle than it's worth); yes, I would love to be able to choose who I am attracted to. Why wouldn't I, it would have made my romantic life up to this point much easier.


_________________
If life's not beautiful without the pain, 
well I'd just rather never ever even see beauty again. 
Well as life gets longer, awful feels softer. 
And it feels pretty soft to me. 

Modest Mouse - The View


edgewaters
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,427
Location: Ontario

12 May 2012, 11:48 pm

rabbittss wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
before i forget, one interesting detail about some obese people who are as healthy as normal-weight people.... is that some of them suffer ill effects if they lose weight (in a healthy manner supervised by nutritionists, naturally). so they are actually healthier when obese then they are thin. it's food for thought that people need to let go of the judgements. some people are better off fat.


Doesn't change the fact I still find them horrid to look at. Don't mind me though, I also find Picasso and Jackson Pollock horrid to look at.. but others find a great deal of meaning in their work.


I think you should try harder to validate people and accept them, if you want your differences to be validated and accepted. It's hypocritical not to do this. You don't have to be attracted to overweight people to not be revolted by them. And that is an attitude, which you can change - if its not then you can't ask others not to be revolted by, say, your aspie traits.