men who won't date fat women

Page 18 of 21 [ 324 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21  Next

ForeverAloneVirgin
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jun 2013
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 103

27 Jun 2013, 8:15 pm

No.
Being short is a genetic attribute. You cannot change that.
A fat girl is just lazy, unhealthy, ugly, and simply doesn't care enough about herself to make the changes.
I would NEVER date a fat woman.



blitzkrieg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,529
Location: United Kingdom

27 Jun 2013, 8:24 pm

Having extra weight can also be genetic. Or a symptom of a thyroid problem. There are many reasons why a person might be 'fat' as you put it, aside from overeating/laziness/lack of exercise.



ForeverAloneVirgin
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jun 2013
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 103

27 Jun 2013, 8:31 pm

blitzkrieg wrote:
Having extra weight can also be genetic. Or a symptom of a thyroid problem. There are many reasons why a person might be 'fat' as you put it, aside from overeating/laziness/lack of exercise.


In the majority of cases that would not be the reason. Even if so I am sure you could still treat it.



uwmonkdm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2013
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 764
Location: Canada

28 Jun 2013, 4:06 am

If you're American you're severely limiting your dating pool if you refuse to date fat women and want a partner over the age of 20-25 :lol:
'mericuh

But no, I wouldn't date a fat woman.
It's disgusting and I don't give a damn who gets mad over me saying it. I cook meals for myself almost every day, I eat healthy and I exercise; a fat woman does not do these things, she eats junk and therefore produces (metaphysically - no toilet humor) junk.

Call me crazy, but I don't think "High IQ" (or whatever measure of intelligence) and "Obesity" have much correlation. You can't all expect a supermodel girlfriend/wife/partner but there comes a point where you just can't be seen in public with someone who doesn't have enough common sense to take care of their body and avoid premature death.

It's much like the idea of people yelling at smokers: "Don't you know that's going to kill you??"
Why can't I go to McDonalds and say the same thing? It's just as true..
And yes, people actually say that s**t, I know because I used to smoke, it was the most annoying thing in the world but it did make me feel ashamed of what I was doing to myself, even if only a little.



Cafeaulait
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,539
Location: Europe

28 Jun 2013, 5:42 am

Kurgan wrote:
A fat woman is less fertile than a fit woman. Futhermore, obesity is mostly a choice; height is not. If a 5'2" woman (who will probably give birth to short kids herself) turns down a 5'8" man, then she's a hypocrite. Likewise, if a 320 lb man turns down a cute, but slightly chubby girl because of her fat percentage, he's a hypocrite as well.


I am 5'4 and I WILL turn down a 5'8 man. I don't see how that is hyprocrite. He has the right to turn me down because of my height as well.
That's like saying: if a woman with big boobs wont date a man with big boobs then she's a hypocrite.

Whatever



MR_BOGAN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age: 124
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,479
Location: The great trailer park in the sky!

28 Jun 2013, 6:03 am

Cafeaulait wrote:

I am 5'4 and I WILL turn down a 5'8 man.


Would you really? :huh: What is you height range do you mind me asking?


_________________
Dirty Dancing (1987) - Trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU8CmMJf8QA


Cafeaulait
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,539
Location: Europe

28 Jun 2013, 7:33 am

Yes. I like taller men around 1.80 (meters)



MR_BOGAN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age: 124
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,479
Location: The great trailer park in the sky!

28 Jun 2013, 7:35 am

I'm 1.79cm. :(


_________________
Dirty Dancing (1987) - Trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU8CmMJf8QA


uwmonkdm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2013
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 764
Location: Canada

28 Jun 2013, 8:57 am

Cafeaulait wrote:
Yes. I like taller men around 1.80 (meters)


I think I'm 1.90 8)



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

28 Jun 2013, 11:40 am

Cafeaulait wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
A fat woman is less fertile than a fit woman. Futhermore, obesity is mostly a choice; height is not. If a 5'2" woman (who will probably give birth to short kids herself) turns down a 5'8" man, then she's a hypocrite. Likewise, if a 320 lb man turns down a cute, but slightly chubby girl because of her fat percentage, he's a hypocrite as well.


I am 5'4 and I WILL turn down a 5'8 man. I don't see how that is hyprocrite. He has the right to turn me down because of my height as well.
That's like saying: if a woman with big boobs wont date a man with big boobs then she's a hypocrite.

Whatever


False analogy.

Big boobs are beneficial in a woman, but not in a man. Nobody said that you didn't have the right to turn him down; you have every right to make hypocritical decisions if you want to. Turning him down exclusively because he's a little shorter than average, might also mean that your own self-image is a little high.



Cafeaulait
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,539
Location: Europe

28 Jun 2013, 12:33 pm

Kurgan wrote:
Cafeaulait wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
A fat woman is less fertile than a fit woman. Futhermore, obesity is mostly a choice; height is not. If a 5'2" woman (who will probably give birth to short kids herself) turns down a 5'8" man, then she's a hypocrite. Likewise, if a 320 lb man turns down a cute, but slightly chubby girl because of her fat percentage, he's a hypocrite as well.


I am 5'4 and I WILL turn down a 5'8 man. I don't see how that is hyprocrite. He has the right to turn me down because of my height as well.
That's like saying: if a woman with big boobs wont date a man with big boobs then she's a hypocrite.

Whatever


False analogy.

Big boobs are beneficial in a woman, but not in a man. Nobody said that you didn't have the right to turn him down; you have every right to make hypocritical decisions if you want to. Turning him down exclusively because he's a little shorter than average, might also mean that your own self-image is a little high.


Completely irrelevant wether big boobs are benificial to a man or not. 'Beneficial' is completely subjective.
Would it be HYPROCRITICAL if a woman of 5'10 wouldn't want to date of 5'8? If so, what does the hypocrisy consist of, exactly?
And if not, why wouldn't it be hypocritical?



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

28 Jun 2013, 12:48 pm

Cafeaulait wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
Cafeaulait wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
A fat woman is less fertile than a fit woman. Futhermore, obesity is mostly a choice; height is not. If a 5'2" woman (who will probably give birth to short kids herself) turns down a 5'8" man, then she's a hypocrite. Likewise, if a 320 lb man turns down a cute, but slightly chubby girl because of her fat percentage, he's a hypocrite as well.


I am 5'4 and I WILL turn down a 5'8 man. I don't see how that is hyprocrite. He has the right to turn me down because of my height as well.
That's like saying: if a woman with big boobs wont date a man with big boobs then she's a hypocrite.

Whatever


False analogy.

Big boobs are beneficial in a woman, but not in a man. Nobody said that you didn't have the right to turn him down; you have every right to make hypocritical decisions if you want to. Turning him down exclusively because he's a little shorter than average, might also mean that your own self-image is a little high.


Completely irrelevant wether big boobs are benificial to a man or not. 'Beneficial' is completely subjective.
Would it be HYPROCRITICAL if a woman of 5'10 wouldn't want to date of 5'8? If so, what does the hypocrisy consist of, exactly?
And if not, why wouldn't it be hypocritical?


We're talking about a 5'4" woman here, not a 5'10" woman. "Beneficial" is what natural selection favours.



thewhitrbbit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,124

28 Jun 2013, 1:50 pm

The question is not to much if she's fat, but if she's doing anything to change it.

I've seen fat women go from fat to hot through hard work and gym time.

I've seen fat women who are damn proud of it and no desire to change.

Loosing weight and getting in shape together can be fun, but I wouldn't be interested in someone who was proud of being overweight.



Cafeaulait
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,539
Location: Europe

28 Jun 2013, 2:16 pm

Kurgan wrote:
Cafeaulait wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
Cafeaulait wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
A fat woman is less fertile than a fit woman. Futhermore, obesity is mostly a choice; height is not. If a 5'2" woman (who will probably give birth to short kids herself) turns down a 5'8" man, then she's a hypocrite. Likewise, if a 320 lb man turns down a cute, but slightly chubby girl because of her fat percentage, he's a hypocrite as well.


I am 5'4 and I WILL turn down a 5'8 man. I don't see how that is hyprocrite. He has the right to turn me down because of my height as well.
That's like saying: if a woman with big boobs wont date a man with big boobs then she's a hypocrite.

Whatever


False analogy.

Big boobs are beneficial in a woman, but not in a man. Nobody said that you didn't have the right to turn him down; you have every right to make hypocritical decisions if you want to. Turning him down exclusively because he's a little shorter than average, might also mean that your own self-image is a little high.


Completely irrelevant wether big boobs are benificial to a man or not. 'Beneficial' is completely subjective.
Would it be HYPROCRITICAL if a woman of 5'10 wouldn't want to date of 5'8? If so, what does the hypocrisy consist of, exactly?
And if not, why wouldn't it be hypocritical?


We're talking about a 5'4" woman here, not a 5'10" woman. "Beneficial" is what natural selection favours.


I am ASKING YOU: Would it be HYPROCRITICAL if a woman of 5'10 wouldn't want to date of 5'8? If so, what does the hypocrisy consist of, exactly?



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

28 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm

Cafeaulait wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
Cafeaulait wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
Cafeaulait wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
A fat woman is less fertile than a fit woman. Futhermore, obesity is mostly a choice; height is not. If a 5'2" woman (who will probably give birth to short kids herself) turns down a 5'8" man, then she's a hypocrite. Likewise, if a 320 lb man turns down a cute, but slightly chubby girl because of her fat percentage, he's a hypocrite as well.


I am 5'4 and I WILL turn down a 5'8 man. I don't see how that is hyprocrite. He has the right to turn me down because of my height as well.
That's like saying: if a woman with big boobs wont date a man with big boobs then she's a hypocrite.

Whatever


False analogy.

Big boobs are beneficial in a woman, but not in a man. Nobody said that you didn't have the right to turn him down; you have every right to make hypocritical decisions if you want to. Turning him down exclusively because he's a little shorter than average, might also mean that your own self-image is a little high.


Completely irrelevant wether big boobs are benificial to a man or not. 'Beneficial' is completely subjective.
Would it be HYPROCRITICAL if a woman of 5'10 wouldn't want to date of 5'8? If so, what does the hypocrisy consist of, exactly?
And if not, why wouldn't it be hypocritical?


We're talking about a 5'4" woman here, not a 5'10" woman. "Beneficial" is what natural selection favours.


I am ASKING YOU: Would it be HYPROCRITICAL if a woman of 5'10 wouldn't want to date of 5'8? If so, what does the hypocrisy consist of, exactly?


No--it wouldn't be hypocritical. Many women like to date taller men and many men like to date shorter women.



MR_BOGAN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age: 124
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,479
Location: The great trailer park in the sky!

28 Jun 2013, 6:22 pm

Cafeaulait wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
A fat woman is less fertile than a fit woman. Futhermore, obesity is mostly a choice; height is not. If a 5'2" woman (who will probably give birth to short kids herself) turns down a 5'8" man, then she's a hypocrite. Likewise, if a 320 lb man turns down a cute, but slightly chubby girl because of her fat percentage, he's a hypocrite as well.


I am 5'4 and I WILL turn down a 5'8 man. I don't see how that is hyprocrite. He has the right to turn me down because of my height as well.
That's like saying: if a woman with big boobs wont date a man with big boobs then she's a hypocrite.

Whatever


You must see kurgans logic.

You are a short woman you are rejecting a guy for being to short(not only that but he has to be a certain height above you).

Like a fat man wanting a skinny woman and a rejecting a woman that is fat, when he is fatter than her.

But yes I agree with you whatever! :lol:


_________________
Dirty Dancing (1987) - Trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU8CmMJf8QA