15 Mar 2013, 12:17 pm
ArrantPariah wrote:
luvsterriers wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
luvsterriers wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
luvsterriers wrote:
Celeb I'm referring to aka Mr Worldwide aka Mr 305. 
I don't perceive what all the whoo-ha is about, but it does look as if you would have to take a number and wait your turn.
I know. He likes open relationships from what I read.
Who exactly is this idiot?
He looks the very opposite of a kind, decent person
Sometimes, even nice girls go nuts over this sort of chap.
I'm a nice girl. I'm not like the women in his videos yet I am crazy about him. Maybe I'm confused person?
Well, while you're getting sexually aroused by looking at him, the standard business formula for this level of "music" would be to provide some hot chicks for men to drool over. Otherwise, heterosexual men would object to him.
It's not quite equal though is it?
We see a lot more female flesh than male
15 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm
nessa238 wrote:
I know what you mean
I don't relate to muscles and tattoos myself as I'm more impressed with thoughts and ideas than outward stuff
I can see how they're a recognition of effort put in etc though
I'm lazy though so don't relate to fitness type stuff
I don't relate to muscles and tattoos myself as I'm more impressed with thoughts and ideas than outward stuff
I can see how they're a recognition of effort put in etc though
I'm lazy though so don't relate to fitness type stuff
I don't know about that but I think we both know you'd rather go for one of these guys over the pretty boy Lilly posted.
15 Mar 2013, 1:19 pm
Wolfheart wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
I know what you mean
I don't relate to muscles and tattoos myself as I'm more impressed with thoughts and ideas than outward stuff
I can see how they're a recognition of effort put in etc though
I'm lazy though so don't relate to fitness type stuff
I don't relate to muscles and tattoos myself as I'm more impressed with thoughts and ideas than outward stuff
I can see how they're a recognition of effort put in etc though
I'm lazy though so don't relate to fitness type stuff
I don't know about that but I think we both know you'd rather go for one of these guys over the pretty boy Lilly posted.
None of them catch my eye I'm afraid; is that Vin Diesel in the middle - he's the only vaguely fanciable one there
I think I like a cross between hard-looking and pretty
Like Tony Mortimer from East 17 (in his younger days that is)
http://z6.invisionfree.com/popscene/ar/t9613.htm
or Gethin Jones
http://tv.uk.msn.com/features/daybreak- ... -1?page=12
Naked abs don't come into it for me though; in fact they turn me more off than on
15 Mar 2013, 1:22 pm
15 Mar 2013, 1:23 pm
15 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm
Mick St John (Moonlight) played by Alex O Loughlin
He's a little young, but tons of women of various ages think Edward is the bomb.
Back to reality. I once dated a guy who looked like Tom Cruise. The eyes and the smile were exactly like Tom's.
15 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
luvsterriers wrote:
Mick St John (Moonlight) played by Alex O Loughlin
He's a little young, but tons of women of various ages think Edward is the bomb.
Back to reality. I once dated a guy who looked like Tom Cruise. The eyes and the smile were exactly like Tom's.
nope and nope
no sexual attraction to those two
I've never understood the whole Robert Pattinson thing AT ALL
and I haven't a clue who the other one is
15 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm
I had my Twilight phase. Alex O Loughlin played Mick St John in Moonlight. It was just for one season on CBS 
Alex is now in Hawaii 5.0.
15 Mar 2013, 2:24 pm
Douuuuuche-baaaags. 
15 Mar 2013, 2:38 pm
15 Mar 2013, 3:17 pm
luvsterriers wrote:
:? Well definitely I'm not fascinated by the whores in his music videos. I don't need to dress like a whore to get a guy's attention. At least I personally don't think so. I don't know. I just watch it because he's just dreamy.
Well, you MIGHT move to the front of his line, if you just mentioned casually that you were a half-Korean virgin.
15 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
15 Mar 2013, 3:34 pm
ArrantPariah wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
It's not quite equal though is it?
We see a lot more female flesh than male
We see a lot more female flesh than male
I don't know. I didn't watch much, and I have no interest in the male flesh. Perhaps when you factor in the intense fascination that the ladies have in him, you need to compensate with a larger portion of female flesh to get any gents interested, so that it evens out in the end product.
I don't watch these videos at all as they're boring to me
I'd be happier if we saw a few male organs on the screen though - that would even up the score nicely
and not even because I want to look at men's parts but because we see endless permutations of female nudity but rarely any
male exposure
Oh but it might make the men all sad and insecure
15 Mar 2013, 4:22 pm
nessa238 wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
It's not quite equal though is it?
We see a lot more female flesh than male
We see a lot more female flesh than male
I don't know. I didn't watch much, and I have no interest in the male flesh. Perhaps when you factor in the intense fascination that the ladies have in him, you need to compensate with a larger portion of female flesh to get any gents interested, so that it evens out in the end product.
I don't watch these videos at all as they're boring to me
I'd be happier if we saw a few male organs on the screen though - that would even up the score nicely
and not even because I want to look at men's parts but because we see endless permutations of female nudity but rarely any
male exposure
Oh but it might make the men all sad and insecure
Why would anyone want to actually look at a Penis though? I thought even women pretty much only tolerated them because of their function not their form..
15 Mar 2013, 4:31 pm
rabbittss wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
It's not quite equal though is it?
We see a lot more female flesh than male
We see a lot more female flesh than male
I don't know. I didn't watch much, and I have no interest in the male flesh. Perhaps when you factor in the intense fascination that the ladies have in him, you need to compensate with a larger portion of female flesh to get any gents interested, so that it evens out in the end product.
I don't watch these videos at all as they're boring to me
I'd be happier if we saw a few male organs on the screen though - that would even up the score nicely
and not even because I want to look at men's parts but because we see endless permutations of female nudity but rarely any
male exposure
Oh but it might make the men all sad and insecure
Why would anyone want to actually look at a Penis though? I thought even women pretty much only tolerated them because of their function not their form..
Very true in my opinion, I just like the idea of men having to expose all their parts as women are so often expected to do in the media
A man's thingy is rarely ever seen and I find this amusing - it's like the world would end if we were exposed to the erect male member!
Are men so insecure that they can't stand being forced to listen to women looking at mens' parts on TV and saying things like 'My that's an impressive one! or 'Look at the girth on that!' (I think this is indeed the case actually)
Women have been tolerating this rubbish since forever regarding their chests so let's have a more even playing field
15 Mar 2013, 4:40 pm
