Why are women so desperate for men?
RetroGamer87
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=89268.jpg)
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,105
Location: Adelaide, Australia
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
There are more women in the world because women live longer. If the birth rate is roughly equal and women live 10% longer than means there will be 10% more women at any given time.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
What? There’s more men then women not the other way around, there’s always been more men then women throughout history despite wars killing mostly men.
Source please.
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
There are more women in the world because women live longer. If the birth rate is roughly equal and women live 10% longer than means there will be 10% more women at any given time.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
What? There’s more men then women not the other way around, there’s always been more men then women throughout history despite wars killing mostly men.
Source please.
Google: Due to higher female fetal mortality, the sex ratio at birth worldwide is commonly thought to be 107 boys to 100 girls, although this value is subject to debate in the scientific community. The sex ratio for the entire world population is 101 males to 100 females.
World health organization: In the human species the ratio between males and females at birth is slightly biased towards the male sex. The natural “sex ratio at birth” is often considered to be around 105. This means that at birth on average, there are 105 males for every 100 females.
UN:The number of men and women in the world is roughly equal, though men hold a slight lead with 102 men for 100 women (in 2015). More precisely, out of 1,000 people, 504 are men (50.4%) and 496 are women (49.6%). For every 100 girls, 107 boys are born, but males have a higher risk of dying than females, both in childhood and at adult ages.
Us census bureau: world population: male: 3,729,242,483. Female: 3,675,865,167
https://www.census.gov/population/inter ... rldpop.php
At every age there’s more men then women until age 50. When people are out of their prime.
Your nations population ratios
at birth: 1.06 male(s)/female
0-14 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
15-24 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
25-54 years: 1.04 male(s)/female
55-64 years: 0.98 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.86 male(s)/female
total population: 1.01 male(s)/female (2016 est.)
Be glad your not one of the .04 men age 25-54
RetroGamer87
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=89268.jpg)
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,105
Location: Adelaide, Australia
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
There are more women in the world because women live longer. If the birth rate is roughly equal and women live 10% longer than means there will be 10% more women at any given time.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
What? There’s more men then women not the other way around, there’s always been more men then women throughout history despite wars killing mostly men.
Source please.
Google: Due to higher female fetal mortality, the sex ratio at birth worldwide is commonly thought to be 107 boys to 100 girls, although this value is subject to debate in the scientific community. The sex ratio for the entire world population is 101 males to 100 females.
World health organization: In the human species the ratio between males and females at birth is slightly biased towards the male sex. The natural “sex ratio at birth” is often considered to be around 105. This means that at birth on average, there are 105 males for every 100 females.
UN:The number of men and women in the world is roughly equal, though men hold a slight lead with 102 men for 100 women (in 2015). More precisely, out of 1,000 people, 504 are men (50.4%) and 496 are women (49.6%). For every 100 girls, 107 boys are born, but males have a higher risk of dying than females, both in childhood and at adult ages.
Us census bureau: world population: male: 3,729,242,483. Female: 3,675,865,167
https://www.census.gov/population/inter ... rldpop.php
At every age there’s more men then women until age 50. When people are out of their prime.
Your nations population ratios
at birth: 1.06 male(s)/female
0-14 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
15-24 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
25-54 years: 1.04 male(s)/female
55-64 years: 0.98 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.86 male(s)/female
total population: 1.01 male(s)/female (2016 est.)
Be glad your not one of the .04 men age 25-54
So the total is 1.01 to 1.00? That's a 1% difference.
That means I have a 99% chance of getting a partner.
I like those odds
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
There are more women in the world because women live longer. If the birth rate is roughly equal and women live 10% longer than means there will be 10% more women at any given time.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
What? There’s more men then women not the other way around, there’s always been more men then women throughout history despite wars killing mostly men.
Source please.
Google: Due to higher female fetal mortality, the sex ratio at birth worldwide is commonly thought to be 107 boys to 100 girls, although this value is subject to debate in the scientific community. The sex ratio for the entire world population is 101 males to 100 females.
World health organization: In the human species the ratio between males and females at birth is slightly biased towards the male sex. The natural “sex ratio at birth” is often considered to be around 105. This means that at birth on average, there are 105 males for every 100 females.
UN:The number of men and women in the world is roughly equal, though men hold a slight lead with 102 men for 100 women (in 2015). More precisely, out of 1,000 people, 504 are men (50.4%) and 496 are women (49.6%). For every 100 girls, 107 boys are born, but males have a higher risk of dying than females, both in childhood and at adult ages.
Us census bureau: world population: male: 3,729,242,483. Female: 3,675,865,167
https://www.census.gov/population/inter ... rldpop.php
At every age there’s more men then women until age 50. When people are out of their prime.
Your nations population ratios
at birth: 1.06 male(s)/female
0-14 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
15-24 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
25-54 years: 1.04 male(s)/female
55-64 years: 0.98 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.86 male(s)/female
total population: 1.01 male(s)/female (2016 est.)
Be glad your not one of the .04 men age 25-54
So the total is 1.01 to 1.00? That's a 1% difference.
That means I have a 99% chance of getting a partner.
I like those odds
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Then substract lesbians, women like Hale boop who want to be single, women who don’t think 95% of the male population isn’t good enough for them, the odds go down.
Also it can be better or worse depending on yiur areas population. Also you age range is .04 more men, so what’s .04 of that age range population.
I’m one of 3,000men that’s a lot f competition but I also have to compete with the thousands of other men for a relationship and that’s doesn’t take in to account the above women who are excluded . So take those women out and there even more then 3,000 excess men.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=89268.jpg)
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,105
Location: Adelaide, Australia
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
There are more women in the world because women live longer. If the birth rate is roughly equal and women live 10% longer than means there will be 10% more women at any given time.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
What? There’s more men then women not the other way around, there’s always been more men then women throughout history despite wars killing mostly men.
Source please.
Google: Due to higher female fetal mortality, the sex ratio at birth worldwide is commonly thought to be 107 boys to 100 girls, although this value is subject to debate in the scientific community. The sex ratio for the entire world population is 101 males to 100 females.
World health organization: In the human species the ratio between males and females at birth is slightly biased towards the male sex. The natural “sex ratio at birth” is often considered to be around 105. This means that at birth on average, there are 105 males for every 100 females.
UN:The number of men and women in the world is roughly equal, though men hold a slight lead with 102 men for 100 women (in 2015). More precisely, out of 1,000 people, 504 are men (50.4%) and 496 are women (49.6%). For every 100 girls, 107 boys are born, but males have a higher risk of dying than females, both in childhood and at adult ages.
Us census bureau: world population: male: 3,729,242,483. Female: 3,675,865,167
https://www.census.gov/population/inter ... rldpop.php
At every age there’s more men then women until age 50. When people are out of their prime.
Your nations population ratios
at birth: 1.06 male(s)/female
0-14 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
15-24 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
25-54 years: 1.04 male(s)/female
55-64 years: 0.98 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.86 male(s)/female
total population: 1.01 male(s)/female (2016 est.)
Be glad your not one of the .04 men age 25-54
So the total is 1.01 to 1.00? That's a 1% difference.
That means I have a 99% chance of getting a partner.
I like those odds
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Then substract lesbians, women like Hale boop who want to be single, women who don’t think 95% of the male population isn’t good enough for them, the odds go down.
Also it can be better or worse depending on yiur areas population. Also you age range is .04 more men, so what’s .04 of that age range population.
I’m one of 3,000men that’s a lot f competition but I also have to compete with the thousands of other men for a relationship and that’s doesn’t take in to account the above women who are excluded . So take those women out and there even more then 3,000 excess men.
Should we subtract gay dudes and men who want to be single?
I think the real reason a lot of men compete over a few women is because all the men aged 20 - 40 are competing over all the women aged 20 - 30. That's approximately twice as many men.
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
sly279 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
There are more women in the world because women live longer. If the birth rate is roughly equal and women live 10% longer than means there will be 10% more women at any given time.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
What? There’s more men then women not the other way around, there’s always been more men then women throughout history despite wars killing mostly men.
Source please.
Google: Due to higher female fetal mortality, the sex ratio at birth worldwide is commonly thought to be 107 boys to 100 girls, although this value is subject to debate in the scientific community. The sex ratio for the entire world population is 101 males to 100 females.
World health organization: In the human species the ratio between males and females at birth is slightly biased towards the male sex. The natural “sex ratio at birth” is often considered to be around 105. This means that at birth on average, there are 105 males for every 100 females.
UN:The number of men and women in the world is roughly equal, though men hold a slight lead with 102 men for 100 women (in 2015). More precisely, out of 1,000 people, 504 are men (50.4%) and 496 are women (49.6%). For every 100 girls, 107 boys are born, but males have a higher risk of dying than females, both in childhood and at adult ages.
Us census bureau: world population: male: 3,729,242,483. Female: 3,675,865,167
https://www.census.gov/population/inter ... rldpop.php
At every age there’s more men then women until age 50. When people are out of their prime.
Your nations population ratios
at birth: 1.06 male(s)/female
0-14 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
15-24 years: 1.05 male(s)/female
25-54 years: 1.04 male(s)/female
55-64 years: 0.98 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.86 male(s)/female
total population: 1.01 male(s)/female (2016 est.)
Be glad your not one of the .04 men age 25-54
So the total is 1.01 to 1.00? That's a 1% difference.
That means I have a 99% chance of getting a partner.
I like those odds
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Then substract lesbians, women like Hale boop who want to be single, women who don’t think 95% of the male population isn’t good enough for them, the odds go down.
Also it can be better or worse depending on yiur areas population. Also you age range is .04 more men, so what’s .04 of that age range population.
I’m one of 3,000men that’s a lot f competition but I also have to compete with the thousands of other men for a relationship and that’s doesn’t take in to account the above women who are excluded . So take those women out and there even more then 3,000 excess men.
Should we subtract gay dudes and men who want to be single?
I think the real reason a lot of men compete over a few women is because all the men aged 20 - 40 are competing over all the women aged 20 - 30. That's approximately twice as many men.
From my experience even guys who say they want to be single don’t reslly want to. It’s a shell hiding their pain.
Gays wouldn’t make up for women with high standards.
I dont know but being as some 18 old women Weill date 60 old men
All I onow is in my age bracket of 18-40 there’s 3,000 more men. Not accounting for women who won’t date losers. So in their minds there’s more women then real men.
Men from other cities and states can also date them. What will happen to all us loneley men in my cities?
Quote:
I don’t believe that’s how biology works though regardless. My grandparents had 3 boys and one girl ify her theory is correct they’d had 2 boys and two girls.
I can’t believe people are arguing with science. Did you not go to school? Are you stupid? It’s not “my theory”. It’s scientific fact.
XX breeds with XY. Y is only present in males, but anything where y is present also has to be a male, giving a 50% chance of being male, and a 50% chance of being female.
Do you not know any math, either? A 50% chance implies that for each pregnacy, there is a 50% chance of being xx or xy. It’s not a 100% chance of having a girl after you’ve had a boy. If you flip a coin 5 times, there’s always a chance you get 5 heads. It’s less common, but it happens.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Maybe you need to date low functioning or IQ women. I’m not just trying to be a dick, but it’s given me an insight into why you’re struggling with dating.
Last edited by hale_bopp on 02 Nov 2017, 5:56 am, edited 3 times in total.
sly279 wrote:
From my experience even guys who say they want to be single don’t reslly want to. It’s a shell hiding their pain.
Some goes for some women who say they want to be single.
Also, some single guys certainly want to be single. They're the ones who can get sex and prefer one night stands over relationships.
sly279 wrote:
Gays wouldn’t make up for women with high standards.
They make up for lesbians whom you mentioned as well.
sly279 wrote:
Men from other cities and states can also date them. What will happen to all us loneley men in my cities?
And men from your city can date women from other cities just like women from your city can date men from other cities. Seriously, it's not like men can only move into your city and never out of your city and women can only move out of your city and never into your city.
hale_bopp wrote:
Quote:
I don’t believe that’s how biology works though regardless. My grandparents had 3 boys and one girl ify her theory is correct they’d had 2 boys and two girls.
I can’t believe people are arguing with science. Did you not go to school? Are you stupid? It’s not “my theory”. It’s scientific fact.
XX breeds with XY. Y is only present in males, but anything where y is present also has to be a male, giving a 50% chance of being male, and a 50% chance of being female.
Do you not know any math, either? A 50% chance implies that for each pregnacy, there is a 50% chance of being xx or xy. It’s not a 100% chance of having a girl after you’ve had a boy. If you flip a coin 5 times, there’s always a chance you get 5 heads. It’s less common, but it happens.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Maybe you need to date low functioning or IQ women. I’m not just trying to be a dick, but it’s given me an insight into why you’re struggling with dating.
Saying it’s 50% chance is different then saying biology keeps gender ratio at 50/50.
Chance doesn’t mean it’ll happen. In reality more men are born then women, that’s a recorded fact. 107 men are born to 100 women. So it’s not 50/50 split.
So you said something that was wrong, then when told it’s wrong changed what your talking about. You were not talking about 50% chance that a baby will be male or female. You said biology makes a 50/50 split so it’d be 100 men to 100 women. But bill doesn’t do such thing.
NorthWind wrote:
sly279 wrote:
From my experience even guys who say they want to be single don’t reslly want to. It’s a shell hiding their pain.
Some goes for some women who say they want to be single.
Also, some single guys certainly want to be single. They're the ones who can get sex and prefer one night stands over relationships.
sly279 wrote:
Gays wouldn’t make up for women with high standards.
They make up for lesbians whom you mentioned as well.
sly279 wrote:
Men from other cities and states can also date them. What will happen to all us loneley men in my cities?
And men from your city can date women from other cities just like women from your city can date men from other cities. Seriously, it's not like men can only move into your city and never out of your city and women can only move out of your city and never into your city.
But they want sex? We talking about never relationship never sex never touching opposite sex. Non asexual guys want some form of interaction with a woman.
There’s more women who’d be fine never having any interaction and just happy using toys.
My ex friend claimed he never wants a relationship and is better off without, he also never wanted a family. Now he’s with a woman long term who has kid.
He’d also cry a lot about being lonely while drunk but deny it sober.
Never said move. It’s called long distant relationships. Where’d a woman from my city dates a guy from the city 2 hours away.
No only men with good jobs could afford to date women outside their city. Similarly you don’t see a lot of min wage employees that live in another city, the commute would finically ruin them. So I could not date outside my city, as a lot of guys can’t. But women can and do date up. So that we’ll off guy in Portland can date a lady in my city, thus meaning another guy in my city is left without a possible match. Such women don’t usually move the man just commutes to them, why he doesn’t just find a lady in his city i dont know. Maybe they have higher standards in richer cities that make him undateable and thus he seeks women in smaller poorer cities who’d see him as well off?
I certainly wouldn’t want to commute 4 hours to see a gf on the weekends.
I’d rather have one down the street I could just walk to.
Question at heart. What do the 3,000 extra men in my city do? There isn’t enough women for all men even if all the women are straight, single, desiring relationships.
So there isn’t a woman for every man and thus it’s highly likely I’ll be alone forever
Last edited by sly279 on 02 Nov 2017, 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
B19 wrote:
That's because they killed so many female infants.
Those numbers are birth rates,before the females are killed.
The logic is more men are born cause men are more likely to die then women in the past, so natural makes more of them, but now with modern science and equality men don’t die as much, women now also die in combat.
RetroGamer87 wrote:
There are more women in the world because women live longer. If the birth rate is roughly equal and women live 10% longer than means there will be 10% more women at any given time.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
Yes there are male sets of twins. There are also female sets of twins and mixed sets of twins. I don't see how multiple births will lead to more males.
Have you just been ignoring me?
There isn’t more women in the world there’s more men, a simple google search shows that.
Male: 3,729,242,483 , female:3,675,865,167
There’s literal 53,377,316 more men in this planet then women. So where’s your 10% more women then men? Did they go to live on the moon?
And as I pointed out the birth rate isn’t equal. Which is partial why there’s 53 million more men. They aren’t dying in war as much anymore, they living longer due to medical science. In the USA not nearly as many men are working dangerous jobs anymore since most got shipped to China. I’m not very like to have reduced life span from working retail, no coal ash in my lungs. I might out live a lot of women who work stressful dangerous jobs, like nursing. Look at presidentS the stress causes them health issues and to age faster. Lots of women today are working face pace stressful jobs that are bad for their health. Equality :p so that women live longer was true I. The past when men went to war, worked dangerous stressful jobs, while most women stayed home. It’s
Irrelevant in today’s world, they need to do. New studies. My generation and the next I imagine will have similar life spans between women and men.
Though harder to see th effect on women, career women get surgery and Botox to look younger.
http://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/g ... 25826.html
There are 33 million more men than women in China.
But, in the USA, there are 157 million women and 152 million men according to the 2010 Census.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Trump defunds Trans women from women’s sports |
05 Feb 2025, 5:14 pm |
Recent Setbacks for Women/Women’s Rights |
01 Feb 2025, 4:47 pm |
Women and slaves. |
09 Nov 2024, 6:59 am |
Women's pronouns |
01 Feb 2025, 8:35 am |