I think love is elusive because society is broken

Page 3 of 3 [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

21 Jul 2009, 10:00 am

MissConstrue wrote:
Hmmm....I wonder how single women or widows got along in the past if they needed men so bad...


They remarried.



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

21 Jul 2009, 12:49 pm

You certain?

My great grandmother never remarried.... :?

What I'm really asking is, what if a female was single back then or is everyone assuming that all marriages were arranged?


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

21 Jul 2009, 1:59 pm

MissConstrue wrote:
You certain?

My great grandmother never remarried.... :?

What I'm really asking is, what if a female was single back then or is everyone assuming that all marriages were arranged?



Oh I know not every woman remarried. But it was an option.

From what I've read, single women stayed with (or returned to) their families.



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

21 Jul 2009, 2:35 pm

Ah sorry for the confusion.

I bet in an Edwardian society it would've been much harder for a female from poverty and no family. From what I gathered the only optional jobs they had were serving as servants and nannies....they were lucky if anything to be making enough money by living on their own. Most of them had to live with their employers.

Aaaah what a nightmare...


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


ManErg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,090
Location: No Mans Land

23 Jul 2009, 7:38 am

sinsboldly wrote:
pardon me while I laugh out loud, because society didn't develop love. The attraction between people that are attracted to each other is not governed by society, no matter how much many many religions and cultures have tried. . .
They don't call it 'the wild thing' for nothing, you know.


Yes, but the society we are brought up in totally conditions the acceptable expressions of it. While we do have our wild natures, it is obvious to me that we most certainly do *not* behave according to our fundamental wild natures at all. 'Civilisation' as we know it couldn't function if we did.

The "go grab it all keep ahead of everybody else only those of high status win out" messages we are bombarded with put huge pressure on relationships. Stimulating our expectations to get us into a state that whatever we've got, it's never enough, we need something else, something more, someone else....


_________________
Circular logic is correct because it is.


billsmithglendale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,223

23 Jul 2009, 12:47 pm

MissConstrue wrote:
Ah sorry for the confusion.

I bet in an Edwardian society it would've been much harder for a female from poverty and no family. From what I gathered the only optional jobs they had were serving as servants and nannies....they were lucky if anything to be making enough money by living on their own. Most of them had to live with their employers.

Aaaah what a nightmare...


You forgot the other option that women with little to no resources have traditionally fallen into -- prostitution. Sad but true, and still the case world-wide, even in the Western world. :(