pandabear wrote:
I gather that, from some perspectives, Western men just aren't sufficiently "manly", either because they are no long watching John Wayne movies, or because they've been emasculated by modern expectations, or by modern Western women.
We recently, in the last perhaps 150 years, came off of the notion that the world was 6,000 years old. We came up with evolution as an answer to our origins but, for whatever reason, have refused to accept its consequences or what it means about who and what we are today - whether we like it or not. What I've quoted above - I think its correct to the extent that no effective alternative has been given. For example, women wanted equality, have wanted and rightfully should have wanted it back since they lost it in Roman times - however, for some odd reason and perhaps fear of being retaken as inferiors, there was a need among at least some 'progressive' feminists to sanitize the existence of inherent gender differences (truthfully - any guy who's brain hasn't been bleached with his hair knows that men and women are fundamentally different in certain ways, we love you just the way you are - no desire to go back to the dark ages or re-institute star chamber court if we find out that you're not perfect, we sure as heck know we aren't).
Women need certain things in place, due to over 100,000 years of programing, to find a man attractive, or to even respect him - but its denied to a certain extent, as in yes - there are unhealthy ways for guys to express these traits but there have to be means that work in today's society. The trick is understanding our identity as a race (human) is getting our heads around what evolution actually means in terms of what we can and can't be in an immediate or real sense as well as understanding how the ill effects of our more incorrigible wiring schemes can be compensated in the world and our culture as it exists today. That also takes perhaps the more adamant 'progressives' in Western (ie. self-labeled European diaspora) culture, and particularly progressive women (IMO not the norm but the vocal minority who sets the agenda by the silence of the majority), to be able to answer this question - do they want to be 'better' than men or, do they want to be in happy/functioning relationships; I could be wrong but I don't think the desire to be better is much more than a fear of being swallowed back down by history.
We have to work together on this though, its a tough and rather costly battle to win just by trial and error (also yes, sorry I've edited the heck out this post - its a pretty complex thought though and I wanted to make sure I got it out right)