Biology and lust.

Post Reply New Topic

Which one, the first or the second? (And neither's boobs are fake btw)

^Agreed. She isn't any skinnier than alot of olympic athletes, and they are some of the healthiest people on the planet. I'd be happy to go with alot skinnier girls than her.

The second one suh.

If it's any consolation, many (certainly not all) of these "hotties" have sh***y personalities. Can sex with them still be good? Yes, but you may not want a long-term relationship with a woman whose personality leaves a lot to be desired.

she has the perfect body. and she's all real too. if anything, the first girl is skinnier, and IMO both are healthy. what do you guys want, Oprah?

LOL, No doubt.

DO NOT WANT!! !

I'd smash either one of those.
I think the most relevant replies in here have been those that deal with media/cultural brainwashing. As an adolescent I was raised on Playboy magazine and Victoria's Secret catalogs. I won't deny being brainwashed, my preference for fantasy and reality is women who look like that, and barring that (beggars can't be choosers) women who come close.
I think that for guys, once you hit puberty your ideas of what is biologically attractive (i.e. media/cultural influences) is pretty much hardwired, and thereafter it will be a challenge to retrain the penis. It occurred to me in my late teens (post-brainwash) that the beauty standards Hollywood put out there (slim, big breasts, etc.) were terribly unfair to the majority of women, who were doomed for life to either try to live up to the standard or reject that standard and be marginalized. But as much as I sympathized on an intellectual level, I still couldn't get it up for fat chicks, no matter how many other desirable qualities thay might have (intelligence, personality, common interests, etc.). Which is a shame, because for life I will be interested in and pursuing this narrow slice of the women out there, and I'm not too good at it either so it will compound my own misery. And as some people stated, it's not universally true but many of the women who meet these beauty standards get so much attention from men that they wind up with personality issues.

Yeah... she's still way too top heavy!

Maybe you should change your brand of porn?

Suicide Girls are smokin' hot, but most of them are, natural, real girls. I spend most of my time looking at the hopefuls rather than the featured girls...

It might give you a better appreciation of the sexiness of real girls.

I don't know what obsession means to you...if something is causing you difficulty or interfering with your life I guess it's a problem

I read an article about sex addiction that said if you devote more than 2 hours to it every day it's an addiction. I don't know how they came up with that. They include internet porn. I think it's a valid addiction and it just was never that easily available pre-internet (this is based on people I know who have talked to me about their sex addiction/porn addiction and how it operates like drug addiction and how they got clean (or not) from it). I don't have that problem but if there were gazillions of photos of the kind of women that I find attractive all over the internet everywhere I wonder if I could. I'm in a stage of being really pissed off about that lately...where's my porn, lol.

For someone who thinks they are addicted ultimately it's like any other addiction, just a distraction from feelings and circumstances that need to be worked through, the person gets clean from the substance and processes the things they were avoiding in the first place.

it's funny cause in the two examples above I think the first woman is gorgeous and the second one is unnattractive in the face so it wouldn't matter what her body looks like to me because there is something untrustworthy & assymetrical about her face. Maybe I'm weird.

Exactly...first one has a much better face and more trust-worthy. Second, from hearing her interviews, is a snob, and she's not as pretty anyway.

Oh my am I ever old. I've hit that age where everybody under 40 looks good simply because they have youth so I think they are both beautiful.

It's probably why I can't be terribly helpful in the "how does this person look and how could they improve their looks" threads. I look at the person and think: no wrinkles, no grey hair, no cumulative age or chronic disease damage. What exactly is the problem? Meanwhile, women 20 years younger than me consider the man in querstion invisible. I suppose this is the attraction of cougars. They see men in a completely different way than younger women. They don't see "funny looking, geeky guy". They see, "man who is 20 years younger than my ex husband and who will make me have happy flashbacks to the 80's when I was that young too".

So....they both look fine to me.

If that's the case, why has not one older women (older meaning 40 and up) agreed to meet me on the dating site? They've said "You're adorable, if I were 20 years younger I'd have sex with you in a heartbeat, I have a hard time believing you're struggling to get women as it is." When I ask them to meet, they say "Too young, I have a brother/son your age, I'm not into that thing."

I can't quite put my finger on it, but for some strange reason, the 2nd girl looks more appealing to me. LOL, j/k Seriously though, even though I tend to like brunettes, the blond has a prettier face, in my eyes. I do agree that the 1st girl looks more trustworthy, but I think that's influenced by thier choice of attire. After all, it's pretty obvious that the blonde is up to no good, and is out to manipulate something, through mind control.LOL

I suspect if you just keep trying...