Charisma, can it be developed? Do some aspies lack it?

Page 3 of 3 [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Aspiewifey
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 64

25 Mar 2010, 1:55 am

GoatOnFire wrote:

To me, charisma seems to all boil down to a personal magnetism. I think it most certainly is affected by the situation. If I were to break charisma into two groups, I would break them between interpersonal charisma which is attracting individual people, and working a crowd which is getting a crowd of people to do what you want them to do. In the case of a professor, if you are his student, it shows him that you are listening to him and respect him if you are talking to him academically and it makes him happy. In an interview setting, it is also more likely to get a better response to a academic discussion relevant to the job because odds are they want to make sure you are competent in an interview. However, in normal social settings, if you are talking academically about a narrow and specialized field of study you will likely bore the sh** out of the other people. When talking about academic subjects I would be careful to make sure you are talking to others who have a similar academic focus. It sounds like you have plenty of self esteem, Aspiewifey. Not a bad thing, but remember that there is such a thing as an intelligent NT.


I like to think of it as having plenty of self-awareness rather than self-esteem, I know where I shine: academia, dancing, making jewelry (among others)...and I know where I FAIL: organization, controlling my temper, resisting lemon cream cookies (among others).

And I know there's such a thing as an intelligent NT...I like to think I AM an intelligent NT (at least the those pesky IQ tests say so) :wink: It's the hubby who's AS.

The point I was initially trying to make (and rereading, I really don't think I was as clear as I should have been) is that there may be more contributing to the sense of awkwardness people feel in social interaction than just being AS. From what I understand, AS correlates highly with above average intelligence, and I just wanted to point out that feeling out of place and strange can go hand-in-hand with just being the smartest person in the room, AS or NT.

A former friend of mine, who always thought she was just "teasing" me, would pretend to start snoring if my conversation became, not even too academic, just too complicated. Message received loud and clear: It's boring when you talk about things you're thinking about. Let's talk more about shopping!

I guess what I was shooting for was a kind of small comfort measure...like when my husband is griping about being clumsy because he's whacked his head on something again and I remind him "Honey, you're 6'2"...there had to be some downside to being so tall!"



GoatOnFire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts

25 Mar 2010, 2:47 am

Sound wrote:
I believe this complication is made even more relevant in this thread, because you seem to be particularly interested in politics, which is, IMO, a whole 'nother realm of charisma. The rules of ever-day charisma don't apply to political charisma. Marketing principles have more relevance in politics than charisma does, IMO.


I think the rules are generally the same if we are talking about charisma. The goal at least is basically the same, getting people to believe in you and have them do what you want. Actually, there may be some marketing principles at play in everyday charisma. I think one thing that is important to all charisma is to seem trustworthy. That way people want to be around you and follow you, whether in the political arena or not.

Sound wrote:
When I voted for Obama, I did not vote for Obama the person, I voted for the idea of Obama. As did everyone who never met the guy. I really don't think this is an expression of Charisma in a lot of ways. Somewhat, it is, but mostly not.


Obama can be an interesting example. In 2006 I took a class about Russian politics. The professor was predicting that a Senator Obama from Illinois would become the next president of the United States because he was the most charismatic politician he had seen since Vladimir Putin. This was a pretty bold prediction at this point in time. If Obama didn't have an amazing amount of personal presence there was no way he was getting through the primaries against the older, better known and established, but less charismatic Hillary Clinton. Not to say that everyone who voted for him did so because of his charisma, but I am saying he wouldn't have won without it.

Sound wrote:
All the stuff I was detailing out in that prior post was from the standpoint of a person being just an every day person, not a politician. There's no relevance between what I was talking about vs politics.


I'm not sure it is irrelevant. I've just been viewing everyday charisma as almost the same as political charisma, but on a much smaller scale. Politics isn't solely decided by charisma, so it gets confusing, but I am trying to focus on the charisma aspect of politics when I am mentioning it. Also, I guess you could say I am taking a roundabout shot at highly charismatic people by comparing them to politicians.

GoatOnFire wrote:
My critique of these.
Sound wrote:
IMO, things that would help your case:
1) Act with socially approveable behaviors and habits - avoid things people generally disapprove of. This includes being a pleasant person, smiling, making people feel comfortable in your presence, the list is enormous.

This is aimed at the smaller stage, working a crowd is a different thing. Wouldn't the point of having charisma mean not having to do this?
Sound wrote:
For the purposes of regional or national politics you're sorta right. The relevance is less.
But, again, charisma, as it applies to the 99% of humans who aren't politicians, follows from habits and behaviors. If you compromise those sources, then charisma begins to drop over time as peoples' perceptions shift.

You don't have to be a politician to work a crowd. Generally, I think this one is right. I'm just saying that at optimal levels, with enough charisma you could get away with not doing some of them.
Sound wrote:
Yeah, a bit, but don't forget that this is all cumulative, and not about specific requirements. Every check box is a point, which check boxes are full is less relevant... If we suck at body language, extra effort elsewhere will compensate!

Another one where you wish you could have the specific numbers. Body language is a pretty big box, I suspect.
GoatOnFire wrote:
Sound wrote:
3) Demand respect from others. Do not accept disrespect. Apologize only when absolutely needed. Don't back down from people. Look people in the eye. Have faith in your own ideas, and stick up for them when appropriate. Do not habitually do things for others when you do not receive something in return.

This would not be very intuitive for me because I probably wouldn't respect a person like that. If you aren't losing anything there's no reason not to do small favors here and there if it's no problem for you. This just sounds like being a dick to me. It sounds selfish, which ironically, is something I have heard aspies accused of frequently.
Sound wrote:
Yeah, I knew this point would take flak, and for good reason... It's a tough concept to convey in any palatable words, and spoken coarsely, it flies in the face of peoples' sensibilities.

But the thing I've learned in recent years more and more is that we teach people how to treat us through every action we make, and every word we utter. We give off small cues in everything we do. Sometimes it's subtle, like posture - bad posture tends to teach people to expect less forthright behavior. Some things are overt, like allowing people to interrupt us - if you allow people to create a habit of interrupting you, and you'll be interrupted all the time, and the interrupter takes subverts you on the hierarchy.

Moreover, there's a line between acting with self respect and requiring respect, versus acting like a dick. It's shifty, it's blurry, but if you don't get up toward that line, you will lack charisma, because you will garner, and be afforded, less respect - perhaps less than you deserve. The less respect one has, the less prone people are to granting one charisma.

The items I specifically listed were things that I see happen a lot, and things that I did myself, such as habitual unnecessary apology. So although it may appear that I'm proposing one to act in an extreme manner, I'm not. My goal is to point out things to think about. Like the relative value of an apology if it is plentiful and casually expected, or a tendency to back down too often when someone confronts another IRL, or to give and give and give and give unbidden while wondering why you receive little in return. These things are each a big deal, when it comes to interpersonal charisma. Actually, they're huge. And they fit together according to a larger pattern, that it pays to proactively seek the respect from others if you deserve more. Who else is gonna do that for you?

I didn't say it was wrong. I just said it wasn't intuitive. I might not respect such a person, but I am not most people. With this one in particular I think there is a very delicate balance that is difficult to get right.
Sound wrote:
I disagree with that last bit! 'Base Personality' ... That's another semantics problem, I'm thinkin. But from what I gather, what you're calling base personality, I'd call habits. Although in the end, I agree, tons of this stuff is hard to change because it's so ingrained.

Habits, that's close, part of what I meant at least. I'd also say something about brain wiring, too. Some of us are just wired differently.
GoatOnFire wrote:
I'm not sure about the 3rd and the 5th ones. To me, with charisma, it's about having something about yourself that makes others approach you, or want to listen to you. Not to say that those aren't good social skills, just I'm not sure they are germane to charisma.

Sound wrote:
I disagree. As a working example of #3, if someone approaches me with a genuine desire to be friendly, without ulterior motives, chances are pretty damn good that I'm gonna like that person. Assuming something doesn't undermine the person, I'm gonna be interested in them, and what they said, because they did something so personally/socially pleasing. I have created a positive bias for this person in my mind. *BLING!* +1 Charisma point.

Now, perhaps that appears to have only affected a single person, me, and hardly creates an 'aura' about that person.

However, the trick is in the after-effects. Since *I* have that bias toward him, people will notice that bias. They will see that I act in a way that empowers him - letting him speak over me, laughin at his jokes, watching him, speaking well of him, etc. When people watch me, they observe that I am proof of this person's worth. And people think, "well, Miles likes him, maybe he's not bad," BLING! +1 Charisma point.

So it's a snowball effect kind of thing.

You'd need some charisma at the start to pull this one off. It can be difficult to seem to someone that you don't have an ulterior motive if your vibes are wrong.


_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?


Sound
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 746
Location: Seattle

25 Mar 2010, 4:18 am

You're right, aspects of marketing is charisma, and vice-versa.

But I'm still not seeing the major connection between political charisma and every-day charisma. For instance, from what I gather of him so far, if I met Obama in real life, and he held no place of office, and acted congruent with the 'face' he puts on for public events and speeches, I think I might find him a bit of a dry, bland, though pleasant enough. Certainly not charismatic, because of how bland and generic interactions with him would be.
Talking with him while sitting at the pub? BORING! There's no way he'd be the center of attention in a group.

But that's to be expected, because that's just his game face. That's the personality he adopts for the public. It's the personality that has proven to offend the least amount of people, and gain approval from the most amount of people. THAT'S marketing, not charisma. Acting like that has no bearing in every day life. Nor does it have much bearing if you're the lead singer of a band. Nor does it help a guy turn ladies' heads.

Now, perhaps he actually is charismatic IRL, if his normal, relaxed persona had a bit more spice, did not need to measure every word spoken. But we have no way of knowing. We are allowed only to see the mass-market Obama brand, and that's all we know. The idea of him, the product, not the person. That's what it usually takes to play the U.S. political game.

Now, a politician who seems like they've got real charisma? BIDEN! That's a guy I'd wanna hang out with! Not nearly so canny a politician and marketeer though.

I'm not saying charisma doesn't factor in politics... I think the Clinton/Obama comparison was probably an apt example. Their political and marketing acumen, and their team's strategies were both top notch, so far as I can tell, but the personality/face of Obama seemed to win out, all other things being relatively equal. Charisma made the difference, there. But charisma aside, if he didn't have that acumen, no way, because Clinton was very good at both angles.
So my point... Charisma is important in politics, but is still only a fraction of what's important. Not only that, it's such a censored, watered down version of charisma, it just seems way too specific compared to other versions of charisma.

Like rockstar charisma! Guys like David Lee Roth (HOLY s**t!!), their charisma is radically different... But, IMO, more similar to 'normal' usable charisma, like what we would actually find useful on a day-to-day basis. Political charisma doesn't compare.

I dunno man, it seems to me that you're either looking for political charisma, or you're looking for 'normal' charisma. The more I think about it, the more they seem so far separated, to me. Kinda like the difference between pub charisma, and job interview charisma (although, those cross over a little).



Northeastern292
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,159
Location: Brooklyn, NY/Catskills

25 Mar 2010, 1:05 pm

Sound wrote:
Northeastern292 wrote:
Although I have heard this from many a person, getting out and observing social interaction is a good way to build charisma.
Not observing - Taking part!


Definitely right on the money there, but it's good to also observe before taking part.



Sound
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 746
Location: Seattle

25 Mar 2010, 8:17 pm

Northeastern292 wrote:
Sound wrote:
Northeastern292 wrote:
Although I have heard this from many a person, getting out and observing social interaction is a good way to build charisma.
Not observing - Taking part!


Definitely right on the money there, but it's good to also observe before taking part.

Too true. But it's easy to go overboard though, and let it keep one from taking the difficult step into the fray.



GoatOnFire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts

26 Mar 2010, 3:52 pm

Aspiewifey wrote:
The point I was initially trying to make (and rereading, I really don't think I was as clear as I should have been) is that there may be more contributing to the sense of awkwardness people feel in social interaction than just being AS.

That's the same thing I've been aiming for in this thread. I'm suggesting charisma level as a different factor than AS, so I appreciate it.
Aspiewifey wrote:
From what I understand, AS correlates highly with above average intelligence, and I just wanted to point out that feeling out of place and strange can go hand-in-hand with just being the smartest person in the room, AS or NT.

This could be the case for many who are multiple standard deviations from the mean in other factors, going either way. I wonder if it would it be harder to be the smartest or the dumbest person in the room I wonder?
Aspiewifey wrote:
A former friend of mine, who always thought she was just "teasing" me, would pretend to start snoring if my conversation became, not even too academic, just too complicated. Message received loud and clear: It's boring when you talk about things you're thinking about. Let's talk more about shopping!

Some people only want to talk about certain topics *cough, aspies*. I guess it doesn't just apply to aspies. My short term auditory retention is very bad, especially in a situation as stressful as conversation, so I would probably be averse to a conversation that was too complicated, myself. Some people just can't handle complicated conversations.
Aspiewifey wrote:
I guess what I was shooting for was a kind of small comfort measure...like when my husband is griping about being clumsy because he's whacked his head on something again and I remind him "Honey, you're 6'2"...there had to be some downside to being so tall!"

I'm not sure I get this. Who is the comfort measure aimed towards?
Sound wrote:
You're right, aspects of marketing is charisma, and vice-versa.

But I'm still not seeing the major connection between political charisma and every-day charisma. For instance, from what I gather of him so far, if I met Obama in real life, and he held no place of office, and acted congruent with the 'face' he puts on for public events and speeches, I think I might find him a bit of a dry, bland, though pleasant enough. Certainly not charismatic, because of how bland and generic interactions with him would be.
Talking with him while sitting at the pub? BORING! There's no way he'd be the center of attention in a group.

I'm not talking about when he is in a pub with regular people, although I think he probably couldn't help but be the center of attention if he entered any pub considering his status. And I would say status definitely has an effect on charisma, and politicians can be an extreme example of that. I am talking about how he operates with his peers in the Senate. He most certainly was the center of attention, one of the best ever at drawing others to him, although he is sputtering on his health care because of bipartisanship.
Sound wrote:
Like rockstar charisma! Guys like David Lee Roth (HOLY sh**! !), their charisma is radically different... But, IMO, more similar to 'normal' usable charisma, like what we would actually find useful on a day-to-day basis. Political charisma doesn't compare.

Getting on stage and drawing hordes of groupies to yourself without having to talk to them all individually? That sounds like political charisma to me, just with more stupid looking hair (on second thought, some political hair is pretty bad...), and skankier groupies. Or am I just looking at the function of charisma?
Sound wrote:
I dunno man, it seems to me that you're either looking for political charisma, or you're looking for 'normal' charisma. The more I think about it, the more they seem so far separated, to me. Kinda like the difference between pub charisma, and job interview charisma (although, those cross over a little).

I still think it's all one and the same charisma, just the manifestation is different depending on the situation.

On another note, I wish I had more time for the conversation in this thread and maybe focus the topic more on L & D because this is the L & D forum. This discussion has been helpful.

Yesterday, I think I found a way for me to increase my charisma because I have actually produced results with it, already. I believe it is a method that will work for some of those who like myself have bad body language and have put in failed efforts to improve social skills over years. The advice is a bit unconventional, even bizarre, and may sound somewhat alarming. If someone wants to hear it I will post it when I have more time. I'm not sure if it would be better in this thread or if I should start a new one. I don't have the time to do a good job of giving the idea justice if I tried to post it now, but I will say that it has something to do with your mindset.


_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?


Last edited by GoatOnFire on 27 Mar 2010, 1:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

Sound
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 746
Location: Seattle

26 Mar 2010, 10:41 pm

Yeah, since it was in the L&D context, I assumed it was charisma as it relates to most people. The way in which, say, Obama's charisma expresses itself is wholly different from some of my more popular friends. As you've illustrated, the idea of charisma in that political context is wholly valid, and I'm sure there's tons in common with both 'kinds,' but there's enough different that it'd make discussion hard without narrowing down the context.

Regarding the David Lee Roth example, I think you're looking at the end result, more than the means. Although Obama & DLR get a similar reaction, their ways of going about it.... Well.. Yeah.
I'd be very keen to see Barry in some tiger striped shiny polyester leotards though.

I'd love to hear your idea, though. And I think you're right that it deserves it's own topic.



deadeyexx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 758

27 Mar 2010, 12:17 pm

I never had a problem being high-energy and charismatic, but just had a lot of bad feedback. I have a horrible natural barometer for being socially acceptable, so when I cut loose, it's inevitable for me to say something odd or get carried away and weird people out.

I think you just have to learn to not care. There's billions of people in this world, and even if you weird out a whole group of them every day, you'll still not get everybody in your whole lifetime.



Sound
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 746
Location: Seattle

29 Mar 2010, 1:05 pm

Just watched a documentary about a particular high school cross country team, and it's 50-year coach, who continually win state championships.
Their coach is an example of supreme charisma. It's his charisma as well as his leadership skill which pushes their organization to excellence.
I watch a lot of documentaries, and this one was very good. Give it a look.
The Long Green Line @ Hulu