Page 3 of 3 [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

21 Jun 2011, 2:50 am

The article was obviously made out of humor, but I can see why some would take it personally.



MathbyIntuition
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

21 Jun 2011, 2:57 am

The top rated women all looked a little slu*ty, like their willingness to put out is what made them more attractive. Then again, I prefer a cute girl who wears sweaters and dresses conservatively. I just wish I didn't live in one of the hot zones on this friggin' planet. No sweaters. ; ;



cyanosity
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jun 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 56

21 Jun 2011, 4:17 pm

Erisad wrote:
GoatOnFire wrote:
RICKY5 wrote:
The men's scale would be fun.

Might be rather disappointing to most guys, actually. I remember a study where they had men grade women on a scale and then women grade men on a scale of physical attractiveness.

The men's scale grading the women was pretty evenly distributed.

But when the women graded the men... well, 80% of guys were graded as below average. Harsh. :?


Sucks being evaluated solely on looks doesn't it? You would think that would make guys stop grading women as if we were cuts of meat but I see it probably didn't do much. :/

Yeah RICKY5, what do you look like? You judge people on their looks all the time, so it's only fair if we get a shot at you. :twisted:


Doesn't help that men aren't very interesting to look at. Oh, and a reality check: chauvinism is EXTREMELY unattractive.



Erisad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,058
Location: United States

21 Jun 2011, 4:45 pm

cyanosity wrote:
Doesn't help that men aren't very interesting to look at. Oh, and a reality check: chauvinism is EXTREMELY unattractive.


Well, they aren't interesting to look at in photos anyway. If you have a really yummy one in person, that's a complete story. That's because not only are they right there but you get to see different dimensions, views, angles, etc. That's why some of those photos make me sad. I have some photos that make me look stellar but others that aren't that great. Sometimes they don't even look like the same person. So it's rather unfair that the higher ranked numbered photos are in more attractive(?) angles while the lower ones have more sloppy shots. Basically, the photographer is telling the viewer, "this girl is hot" based on how he has her posed and dressed. I'm sure those higher ranked girls have plenty of unattractive photos, we all do. So ranking someone based on one photograph is rather silly.

Oh and chauvanism is so not hot. Equality is sexy. :wink:



cdfox7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,700

21 Jun 2011, 6:01 pm

MCalavera wrote:
The article was obviously made out of humor, but I can see why some would take it personally.


With humour it can go two ways it make people laugh or not.
Its just the question of using the right humour for the right people in the right place and at the right time. Its individual perceptions at play here mate :wink:



SyphonFilter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Feb 2011
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,161
Location: The intersection of Inkopolis’ Plaza & Square where the Turf Wars lie.

21 Jun 2011, 6:41 pm

ToadOfSteel wrote:
How come the 5's and 6's were hotter than the 7+? What is this i dont even...


Notion seconded. The woman numbered 10 is pretty. Pretty fugly, that is.



Rossc09
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 14
Location: Boston, MA

03 Jul 2011, 7:19 pm

Ew.