My girlfriend just dumped me.

Page 3 of 3 [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Ilka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 May 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,365
Location: Panama City, Republic of Panama

17 Aug 2011, 10:25 am

trappedinhell wrote:
Yes, there is a lot of truth in that. How I feel for her is absolute and complete, and that can be scary. Plus I'm a bit different and don't pick up on the clues she thinks I should pick up on (it's hard when you're five hundred miles away and she doesn't talk).

But I just got another email from her. It turns out there is another reason why she was very quiet over the past month. Why she almost never replied, and when she did she was irritable and felt I did not understand at all.

Yesterday (the day after dumping me) she went to the doctor. She has always had severe health problems and she said last month was very bad, but I took it as part of her normal health problems. No, it turns out this week was different. Yesterday she had a biopsy. To test for cancer.

I think having a boyfriend is the last thing on her mind right now.

I wish I knew what to do.


Be her friend. What she really needs right now is a friend. A person that's gonna be there for her and will support her without expecting anything in return. If you really love her, be there for her.

But be aware that she might reject you. Don't take it personally. Apparently she rejected you because she is afraid. When people is ill they want to push everybody away to avoid them the pain. But that does not work. All they do is hurt the people around them IN ADVANCE. Try to be strong and keep going despite her rejection.



trappedinhell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 625
Location: Scotland

17 Aug 2011, 11:28 am

Ilka wrote:
Be her friend.

Forget all the stuff about boyfriend and rejection now. This is serious. Certainly puts my problems in stark perspective. I just did some research. I never guessed.

I don't want to give too many details as I am easy to identify (and she values her privacy), but this does not look good.

I need to find some specialist medical forums and quickly.



Last edited by trappedinhell on 21 Aug 2011, 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Artros
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 646
Location: The Netherlands

17 Aug 2011, 3:45 pm

Well, that certainly puts the rest of the thread into some perspective.

My best to your friend. She needs you now. As a friend.


_________________
"Be slow to fall into friendship; but when thou art in, continue firm and constant. " -Socrates
AQ: 40/50
EQ: 17/50
SQ: 72/80 (Extreme Synthesiser)
Aspie test: about 150/200 Aspie, about 40/200 NT


Chronos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,698

17 Aug 2011, 4:10 pm

trappedinhell wrote:
Chronos wrote:
most people in big cities don't own their dwelling place

They still pay high rents. I live with my parents in order to save money. It is not the same.

Chronos wrote:
There are many otherwise successful people who would like to marry but cannot find someone they are compatible with

Do you mean they cannot find anyone who would accept them? I would accept them.
Do you mean they cannot accept other people? Then marriage must not be such a high priority.


If you would date anyone on the basis that they would date you then you must correlate being in a relationship with being happy, however when you are paired with just anyone then it's rarely the case that you will find happiness in that relationship because they tend to deteriorate rather quickly.

On the basis that what one is really looking for is happiness, a successful person who has relationship troubles cannot find happiness in a relationship any more than you can. Whether they can actually get someone to date them then becomes irrelevant, but of course there are successful people who have trouble getting a date even if they, like you, think they aren't being selective (you both actually are somewhat selective whether you realize it or not),

trappedinhell wrote:
Chronos wrote:
trappedinhell wrote:
Similarity is the most important factor.

Similar life philosophies, political views, and complimentary goals actually.

== similarity

Chronos wrote:
If your choices are a fork, or a knife, when you really need a spoon, it doesn't matter that you have two choices.

A starving person will adapt, if any need food badly enough.


As I said above, the relationship would ultimately fail if someone settles for someone they are not actually compatible with.

trappedinhell wrote:
Chronos wrote:
plenty of people like you exist. They post to this forum all of the time.

People who's top priority is to fix the world? That's wonderful! I would like to meet them. I would like to hear about their projects and see their time lines for how they will achieve our shared goal. How do they propose to eradicate war? How have they solved the problem of vested interests and human nature? How will they persuade doubters? I want to hear!


Sure, those people exist as well. However the people on here who are like you are like you in the sense that they are self pitying men who claim will date anyone but that no woman will date them because they don't have a job, or enough money, or enough status, don't have a good personality, etc...any one of about 10 different reasons, some valid, some not, most they don't feel they should have to change one way or another, and the all share in common the fact that they don't understand what relationships are really about and don't really realize what is inhibiting them in this area, though they think they do.

trappedinhell wrote:
Chronos wrote:
It's a bit difficult to be original with 7 billion people in the world.

Not as difficult as you might imagine. Take science for example. You only need to specialize for three or four years, then you are doing work that nobody has ever done before.


No sir, you are not original in your problems you have presented here and probably many other aspects of your life. I could state that on a theoretical basis as human variation is largely a matter of gaussian distribution, but there is no need to because the song you have just sung is the same song that's always sung in here...I can pull up multiple posts if you would like to see.

trappedinhell wrote:
As for whether other people are trying to fix the whole world, given the scale and complexity of the task, and its fundamentally informational nature, such a person would certainly have an online presence. I have searched for the last fifteen years. They do not exist.


It depends on what you consider the whole world. But realistically you are not going to accomplish your goals if you do not have something to leverage towards it. That is a discussion for a different forum though.

trappedinhell wrote:
Chronos wrote:
if [sense of humor] were the only factor, then you would not be single. But again, it's not. It's just one of many traits women find attractive in a man.

I agree. The number one factor is similarity, the second is status.


By your definition of status, and what you consider to be low status, it very well could be the second factor, but again, who knows. If some woman found X quality of you so attractive, then she might overlook some things.

trappedinhell wrote:
Chronos wrote:
If someone were to spend all of their money and life savings on such an endeavor, I imagine such a thing must be the pinnacle in life that brings them happiness and fulfillment.

There are two a fatal flaws in that assumption.

First, while this does fulfil the three higher human needs (esteem, self actualization and self transcendence) it undermines the three foundational human needs (physiological, safety and love/belonging). It is like saying a prisoner must be happy because he is well fed and is kept safe.


There is a thing called taking responsibility for ones choices. Most people who spend all of their money know they will be left with no money and they know the ramifications of that. Most people who commit crimes know they could go to jail for it.

You are hinging on unreasonable in your arguments and probably a step away from committing logical fallacies and arguments based on semantics. If you wish to continue cling to your negative perceptions which you are attempting to justify (and not doing a very good job of it) you should move your post to the Haven as that forum is for emotional venting and wallowing. This forum is for advice on relationships and the asker should be receptive to solutions to their problems, which you are not.

trappedinhell wrote:
Second, and more seriously, lacking the lower three puts the higher three in jeopardy. Without a reliable income and the ability to communicate, complex research cannot happen. Yet that same complex research means a person;'s career and friendships will suffer. Catch 22.


And your argument has completely fallen apart. As I said, I suggest to you the Haven.

When you are receptive to improving certain social aspects of your life, then we can talk.



trappedinhell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 625
Location: Scotland

17 Aug 2011, 4:40 pm

Chronos wrote:
And your argument has completely fallen apart. As I said, I suggest to you the Haven.
When you are receptive to improving certain social aspects of your life, then we can talk.


Dismissing an argument by simply stating it has "fallen apart" and saying no more is an empty insult. As for being unreceptive to improving, that is an easy jibe to throw, and I will refrain from the obvious response.

I agree that this debate is wandering off topic and achieving nothing. It also seems redundant given the latest turn of events. But thank you for taking the time to respond. You have been helpful in the past and I know you mean well.



trappedinhell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 625
Location: Scotland

18 Aug 2011, 12:40 pm

She just got the results: She's clear!! !!

I don't think I'll be posting for a while. This has been a very exhausting week.