Knifey wrote:
AsteroidNap wrote:
Pardon me, but I guess I don't see the purpose of these generalized threads?
it is a scientific discovery? If only 15% of people on a drug experience explosive diarrhea do you think they shouldn't put it on the label because it doesn't apply to everybody? wtf is with you people, i just point out two research papers that have done significant scientific trials on something and you all go... "hmmm naaaaah i don't think so."
Because many here in this community, myself included, dislike attributing generalized types categorically to one group or another. I'm relatively new here myself, and already I'm sort of dismayed at the sweeping generalizations that happen here. "All men suxxors, all women are biotches", gets really old, fast.
Also, the sweeping generalizations most cite, or employ, are typically gleaned from an NT sample, not an AS sample. That in and of itself makes the conclusions dubious.