The masculine role in society

Page 3 of 6 [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Noodlebug
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 127

19 Nov 2012, 4:56 am

As a male who feels very gender neutral, I must say this is an awesome topic and that I'm glad to see the civil discussion that everyone is having regarding it.

For me, I've called off pursuing girls for an indefinite time. Over time, I realized I was basing my entire self worth on the opinion of a woman. I don't know why guys haven't figured this out yet. Women figured it out long ago that they didn't want to be validated by Men. It's time for the guys to realize this if we are to improve as a society.

Not to mention, I have feminine interests that would probably turn off most women. Sometimes I wish I was gay, so that I could have an easier time dating.



mds_02
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,077
Location: Los Angeles

19 Nov 2012, 5:01 am

Kjas wrote:
Where is Hyper? We need her here to tell you how wrong you are again. :razz:
She's the only one you pay attention to when it comes to that sort of thing. ;)
It was simply an unproven theory - don't jinx it yet. :lol:


I'd probably listen if you told me I was wrong.

You and she have a thing in common. Both of you have shown a willingness to really examine both sides of an argument. That is to say acknowledging an opposing arguments valid points, rather than just looking to shoot holes in it.

I have a lot of respect for people who can do that, and just tend to take their opinions more seriously.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,045
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

19 Nov 2012, 5:33 am

I hate the word "roles" altoghether.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

19 Nov 2012, 5:38 am

Kjas wrote:
Girls: What role would you like your guy to have in an LTR that is different from the current or previous gender expectations as discussed in this thread?

in my own life, "gender roles" are pure bollocks. any socialised expectation based on the equipment between my legs (or between my partner's legs) is an absolute and utter fairy tale and i choose not to participate in it.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

19 Nov 2012, 5:42 am

hyperlexian wrote:
in my own life, "gender roles" are pure bollocks. any socialised expectation based on the equipment between my legs (or between my partner's legs) is an absolute and utter fairy tale and i choose not to participate in it.


The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
I hate the word "roles" altoghether.


I edited it - see the definition of "role" above - I couldn't come up with a better word for what I wanted to express - English being not the first language and all -, sorry.

This is meant as a personal question in this case - not so much a societal one.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


FunkMasterMike
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 143
Location: Lancaster, CA

19 Nov 2012, 5:47 am

I look above stereotypes and other cliche things.
Everyone (male or female) should be responsible, optimistic, balanced, etc. (or just strive to be better at positive things)
I strive to look more masculine, but my personality is always unique, and my own, without caring what others think about me.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,045
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

19 Nov 2012, 5:54 am

I cannot answer your question kjas because I have never experienced a real relationship.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

19 Nov 2012, 5:57 am

my position is still the same in response to the definition - i don't fit into a box and i wouldn't expect a partner to do so. if i am the person who wields the dremel tool when the cupboard needs repairing, i can also be the one who cries when i see puppies in commercials. or maybe we both like hugs and both hate cleaning the bathroom (the grout will be full of mildew but we'll never be short of cuddles, perhaps). or maybe we both see ourselves as stoic and hardworking at the office - we don't have to be complementary because "roles" are such a manufactured and false dichotomy.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

19 Nov 2012, 6:10 am

hyperlexian wrote:
my position is still the same in response to the definition - i don't fit into a box and i wouldn't expect a partner to do so. if i am the person who wields the dremel tool when the cupboard needs repairing, i can also be the one who cries when i see puppies in commercials. or maybe we both like hugs and both hate cleaning the bathroom (the grout will be full of mildew but we'll never be short of cuddles, perhaps). or maybe we both see ourselves as stoic and hardworking at the office - we don't have to be complementary because "roles" are such a manufactured and false dichotomy.


Everyone individualises things in their relationships.
I was asking because I want people to get out of the above examples which you have just stated. I want to know what they would like instead. I'm not viewing it as a gender thing as much as a people thing, and a very individualised people thing because I think people will have different answers.

It can be as simple as someone you feel is compatible with you who makes you happy - if you feel that is what you want and need in a partner. I am not asking to put anyone in boxes - quite the opposite. I want to know what makes people feel wanted, needed and useful - and in turn what their partners want, need and think that they have to offer and appreciate from them.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

19 Nov 2012, 6:25 am

but really, that's just trading one role for another (i.e. feeling wanted, needed and/or useful for character traits or skills). if i desire to be the person in the relationship who is the caregiver (or the fixit person), or if i need for someone to validate me as the breadwinner, then i've created a whole new box for myself. it's just as limiting as the old-fashioned roles, just with new packaging. just because a box is self-selected and individually maintained doesn't make it any less limiting.

what i'd like to see is for people to exist as whole humans. they are not completing someone else or offering something of themselves, but are rather complete and healthy and whole (not halves of a whole). that's not to say that each person would be good at every single thing, but i think it is dangerous territory to seek out a mate that fulfills the things that a person believes themselves to lack.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

19 Nov 2012, 6:32 am

hyperlexian wrote:
but really, that's just trading one role for another (i.e. feeling wanted, needed and/or useful for character traits or skills). if i desire to be the person in the relationship who is the caregiver (or the fixit person), or if i need for someone to validate me as the breadwinner, then i've created a whole new box for myself. it's just as limiting as the old-fashioned roles, just with new packaging. just because a box is self-selected and individually maintained doesn't make it any less limiting.

what i'd like to see is for people to exist as whole humans. they are not completing someone else or offering something of themselves, but are rather complete and healthy and whole (not halves of a whole). that's not to say that each person would be good at every single thing, but i think it is dangerous territory to seek out a mate that fulfills the things that a person believes themselves to lack.


We are saying the exact same thing here... you do realise that right?
I must say, every time I have ever attempted to respond to you - you always act like you are advocating for one side, and I the opposite. I rarely do it such things the way you take my comments - my thinking is not polarised like that. I realise I am crap at English and utterly useless at expressing myself in the written form - but sometimes it does get a bit ridiculous.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


MjrMajorMajor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,748

19 Nov 2012, 10:30 am

hyperlexian wrote:
but really, that's just trading one role for another (i.e. feeling wanted, needed and/or useful for character traits or skills). if i desire to be the person in the relationship who is the caregiver (or the fixit person), or if i need for someone to validate me as the breadwinner, then i've created a whole new box for myself. it's just as limiting as the old-fashioned roles, just with new packaging. just because a box is self-selected and individually maintained doesn't make it any less limiting.

what i'd like to see is for people to exist as whole humans. they are not completing someone else or offering something of themselves, but are rather complete and healthy and whole (not halves of a whole). that's not to say that each person would be good at every single thing, but i think it is dangerous territory to seek out a mate that fulfills the things that a person believes themselves to lack.


I think the important thing in a relationship is fluidity. There might be a certain gravitation to "roles" due to the personalities and life issues that are being dealt with at the time, but those issues are always shifting throughout your lifetime. In the OP's original post, the rules of masculinity or "man box" lead away from a teamwork mentality between the sexes and more toward a more almost parental and/or dismissive role towards women. In that instance, the women in the relationship are regulated to second class, and the men don't truly have a partner. The further we can get away from that, the better.



starryeyedvoyager
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 942
Location: Berlin, Germany

19 Nov 2012, 10:30 am

My impression is that, at least in our western, occidental society, men are going south. Slowly, but nocitably. At the moment, women have a good go in media and arts, just look at all the female musicians that are just over the top in the popularity. Now, you could say that this is just a trend that might wear off. Maybe. But I can tell you some numbers here: At my college, about 55% of all freshmen, of all the people enrolling at my university, are women. And it has been like that for a couple of years now, and the numbers are still increasing. The key abilities of men that defined their role in archaic and feudal societes is dwindling, and many younger men are trapped between what their peers, men that is, and the ever moving and changing society expects from them.
In other words, the abilities that nature endowed men with that are naturally more developed than those of women, are, more or less, purely optional in today's convenient life: Strength, stamina, size, all these things only matter in really hard physical labour, not when holding lectures at college, not when operating a computer, not when planning a business structure. Yes, a man's brain is more geared towards logical thinking than a woman's, but the difference is alot, ALOT smaller than the physical one. Men still hold monopoly over entertainment that caters to their strengths, sports that is. But even that, at least here, is changing... very, very slowly, but notciably: Women's soccer is actually becoming more and more popular (and the Germans LOVE their soccer), and it is only a matter of time until we have a women's major league with nothing but professionals playing.

I absolutely agree with the video's contents: Us guys, we need to redefine our role in a society that will move to a point where a man's strengths become obsolete, where the man himself will become obsolete, a relic of the past that has no place in this world anymore. I, for one, am aware of that. That doesn't mean we should always disregard what differences are between men and women. I am myself at a point where, if I had a son, wouldn't know what to tell him what it means to be a man upon this planet. It certainly isn't the warrior, the food provider, the hunter anymore. Is it jut the physical labourer that works on construction sites, at the garage or in factories? After all, politics and economics is still an area that is dominated by old, white men that rarely allow women amongst their ranks... but have you checked lately where that got us? Besides, this exclusivity might work as long as theirs men to recruit... but what if, at one point in the future, there's no more guys left with proper education?
You might say that these are worst case scenarios, things that might or might not happen. But like with global warming: Maybe it is us who are responsible, maybe it's not, maybe both. But no matter if it is our fault, the change is comming, and either you prepare for it, or you watch your own little world crumble between your hands.


_________________
In character,
In manner,
In style,
In all things,
The supreme excellence is simplicity.
- Jesse Glover

My Autistic Score: 147 out of 200
My Neurotypical Score: 50 out fo 200


DialAForAwesome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,189
Location: That place with the thing

19 Nov 2012, 11:35 am

Wolfheart wrote:
belikeh2o wrote:
Seriously, how many of those "men" can fish and hunt and cook and clean their own game? Harvest and plant according to season? Build from natural materials? Not usually the same type of guy who's "got game."


Excellent..I thought some people on this forum were living in the 1950's, it appears my statement was quite forward in years by a few years.

Screw sophistication and charm, drag her back to her cave Grizzly Adams style so you can appoint her a loin cloth and cook her an animal skin and show her your primal skills. For some reason, if there's some type of natural disaster or nuclear apocalypse, she could well find living in your cave to be an appealing prospect.

Maybe if you stopped talking about women as if they are some kind of trading commodity and started talking to them, you might get somewhere. Does it anger you because women don't want to be independent instead of being dependent on you?


.....this response.....doesn't make sense in response to the post you quoted lol.

He's not saying anything about a woman living in his cave. He's trying to say "how many of these men are the ooga-booga cavemen they claim to be?" The answer is, not many of them. A lot of them pretend and scheme and manipulate to make themselves seem that way. And people of both sexes fall for it.

Then he basically says the same thing I said earlier. Don't worry so much about gender roles and all that ooga-booga single-brain-celled BS, because that is exactly what it is. It's a load of BS.


_________________
I don't trust anyone because I'm cynical.
I'm cynical because I don't trust anyone.


BlueMax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,285

19 Nov 2012, 2:25 pm

My role in a Long Term Relationship? To be me!

Her role - to be herself.

Everything else will be divvied up according to fairness and ability.


Had my wife gone back to work and *I* provided the childcare, we'd have earned twice the income and a clean house with good meals... but she had to force traditional roleplaying and send me off to work without any real education and crippled with AS. She was very loving to the kids but refused to teach any real life skills, like social behaviour, manners, cleaning up after themselves, etc. She also didn't clean at all, barely cooked.

*sigh* If we'd assigned our roles according to our abilities, we'd have been very successful instead of failing.



IrishTusk
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 239
Location: Leven, Fife

19 Nov 2012, 2:38 pm

I propose we enforce new roles. Encourage fitness and Civil service among men again! And let women handle the less physical jobs. Hey I couldn't care less if women had all the comfy office jobs, I enjoy manual and physical labour.

Let Women run the nation and Men build and protect it. Better Rules and expectations for every body :lol:

----------------------------------

Enough from me, Good topic btw.

Although I know I was never raised to veiw women as Objects or to be Dominated. However the stuff like, Men don't cry, You got to be tough for others, Lead by example ect. Were all hammered into me.

When it came to women it was mostly things like, Never hit a woman no matter what, Even if she hits you just take the blow and walk off. Always open the door for a woman, help a woman if she needs it.

That said I'm the type of person to offer help to a complete stranger I see in the market struggling to lift the 30 kilo bags of dog food ect.

---------------------------------------

Quote:
sigh* If we'd assigned our roles according to our abilities, we'd have been very successful instead of failing


I'm presuming you're talking about your ex, I just gotta say man it sounds like your still beating yourself up with what ifs. Some things just don't work out if you keep going over what could have happened to change things your going to torture yourself.


_________________
Your Aspie score: 56 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 144 of 200
You are very likely neurotypical