Loving someone warts and all; imperfections. Thoughts?

Post Reply New Topic

Thanks BlueMax

"Will, she's been dead two years and that's the sh*t I remember. Wonderful stuff, you know, little things like that. Ah, but those are the things I miss the most. The little idiosyncrasies that only I knew about. That's what made her my wife. Oh, and she had the goods on me too, she knew all my little peccadillos. People call these things imperfections, but they're not. That's the good stuff. And then we get to choose who we let into our weird little worlds. You're not perfect, sport. And let me save you the suspense. This girl you met, she isn't perfect either. But the question is whether or not you're perfect for each other. That's the whole deal. That's what intimacy is all about. Now you can know everything in the world, sport, but the only way you're finding out that one is by giving it a shot. You certainly won't learn from an old f*cker like me. Even if I did know, I wouldn't tell a piss ant like you." - Sean, "Good Will Hunting (1997)"

So true!
I love xkcd comics.

Okay I’m going to put this all in the same place to make it easier.

Most people love conditionally and have relationships that are conditional.
This is the overwhelming majority of people – more than 99.99% of relationships really.
For those, they *will* pick and choose. It will be “in despite of ” for most of the traits that they don’t like.
Those who are further along in the process will actually “accept” these traits – this happens in most really great long term relationships that last.
It can all fall apart because all of it is conditional. One partner may be “accepting” the others quirks, while the other partner may be putting up with said quirks in the “despite” mode.
This usually ends up in breakups and divorce (one of the major factors anyway).
But most people aren't aiming for the ”despite” category - they aim for the "accept" category. Most will settle for it in the end, but most aren't aiming for it.
So for the large majority of people, what you were saying is true – it’s despite and in some cases, accepting.

A very tiny minority have love that is truly unconditional and relationships that are unconditional.
It’s such a small minority that most people never experience it themselves, although a few may see an example.
For these, they don’t pick and choose – they can’t, they are incapable of doing so.
Instead, yes, they actually “love” the traits we are discussing, it really is in the “because” category.
These types of things usually do not fall apart – only circumstances or death manage to separate or end them.
It’s also really rare to meet people like this because most people never accept themselves, or anyone else, enough to even have the possibility of finding such a thing - the amount of security, trust and faith it takes is well beyond what most people are capable of - and that's if you can find the right person.

there's "warts", and then there's dealbreakers.

Kjas, so it looks like you're defining 3 kinds of attitudes towards flaws: something like "put up with", "accept" and "unconditional". The first 2 make sense to me. The "accept" state seems like a good thing to aim for and, most importantly, attainable. As for the "unconditional" state - well, maybe I'm taking it a bit too literally here , but how do people who love unconditionally pick the person to love? If it's truly unconditional they would just love everyone, wouldn't they, rather like the Christian God does? That would make sense. (Whether it's true or not is another question, but it's logically consistent.) If they love only some people then isn't that, by definition, conditional, even if it's hard to determine what it's conditional on? Or are you saying that their love starts out as conditional, but later becomes unconditional, progressing through the 3 states in order?