Thanks, everyone, for your comments and insight so far.
abyssquick wrote:
You have to use both parts of the mind - the "spark" is the heart (metaphorically) and of course your mind is what ultimately must be contented. The spark subsides to a glow, and you'll be left with the comparatively mundane things you both do every day.
I think I see "spark" differently. To me it's something separate from lust, that feeling that is there for a while but fades over time. It's an energy that is really only there at the very very beginning. A feeling of "this feels right, I want more of this". When I have a spark with someone, on the second date the spark tends to be gone, replaced with a different (albeit similar) feeling. So without the spark, I'm not likely to feel excited about seeing the person again, which means I might just not bother.
albeniz wrote:
If I were you I would probably try giving more blokes a second date.
I can definitely give this a go. What I usually find though is that the second date, when I go on it reluctantly, is almost guaranteed to be even less exciting than the first. Would you have any suggestions on how to feel motivated to go on that second date? I.e. how to go into it with a more positive attitude?
ToadOfSteel wrote:
yellowtamarin wrote:
windtreeman wrote:
Anyway, fast forward through middle school and it was the same, then finally in high school, a girl that I'd hardly noticed despite sitting next to her for an entire previous year, got my phone number and asked me out on a date. People considered her attractive and she was swim captain and very intelligent but the only reason I accepted the proposal was because I didn't want to hurt her feelings, not because I was attracted to her. Fast forward and everything about her grew on me with time and we ended up dating for four-ish relatively enjoyable years only to terminate in the exact opposite of circumstances - I was deeply in love and invested and she'd grown out of it, or whatever it was.
I've never really understood this "growing on you" phenomenon because for me, if it isn't happening within the first week or two, it ain't gonna happen
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Have you tried that? I've found that familiarity is very attractive for me. I'm more attracted to a female friend that i've known for a long time (unfortunately not mutual) than I am in cover models...
Yeah, I find if I get to know someone too well first, then being romantic with them feels awkward, because I just don't see them in that way. Sort of like the "feels like I'm kissing my brother" scenario. But, as I mentioned in a previous post, there was one time I let the feelings grow. What existed there for me in the beginning was a feeling of "I'm not sure if I'm romantically interested but I really want to find out". I've never had that before or since. Usually it's "I don't think I'm romantically interested, perhaps I should try to find out because giving someone more of a chance is the right thing to do".
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Mindsigh wrote:
Picky and alone is better than not picky and miserable and trapped. Believe me. At least you still have opportunities.
Wisest post in this thread, listen to her, yellowtamarin.
The fact that you're affording to be picky currently only means that you're still getting loads of opportunities.
However, the latter won't last forever.
Of course it's better. Like I said in the original post, I have that advantage. What would you suggest I do about it?
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Another question, yellowtamarin.
If you're not sure what you really want, think of the best date/partner/bf you ever met in your life; how was he/she like? Your answer to what you want can be there.
I am sure of what I want. The problem is I hardly ever find it. Perhaps I should be
less sure of what I want (somehow) which would make me less picky.