07 Apr 2013, 9:27 am
07 Apr 2013, 9:27 am
07 Apr 2013, 9:32 am
07 Apr 2013, 10:44 am
Polarhound wrote:
My biggest pet peeve of all: Someone who can't put their phone away for half an hour without getting the shakes or compulsive urges to constantly check it, even during a date...
Ooo! Good one!
I've watched couples come into a restaurant, peruse the menu, order their meals, eat, pay the bill, and leave. All the while, at least one of them is texting, talking on the phone, or surfing the net. Obviously, neither of them considered the other important enough to give them their undivided attention.
07 Apr 2013, 10:46 am
07 Apr 2013, 10:48 am
07 Apr 2013, 10:51 am
Cafeaulait wrote:
Fnord wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
-Secretly has penis
That's called a clitoris (a woman's secret penis).Yes ... that's exactly what it says ... "Dhoric" ...
07 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
uwmonkdm wrote:
Rape/molestation victim
I found especially this one unfairly harsh. You do realize how many women get at least molested in their lifetime? Besides, if your girlfriend would be raped when in a relationship with her, would you dump her because of that?
07 Apr 2013, 1:03 pm
Lilya wrote:
uwmonkdm wrote:
Rape/molestation victim
I found especially this one unfairly harsh. You do realize how many women get at least molested in their lifetime? Besides, if your girlfriend would be raped when in a relationship with her, would you dump her because of that?
I think the guy who wrote this is in Canada. In North America, where I am located, the general population of women is predominately anti-male. It is very easy for a North American woman to generalize a single incident with one man into general mistrust and hatred toward all men in a way the preempts a successful relationship. There is an "every man should be regarded as a potential rapist" undercurrent within Feminism. I suspect he is not trying to be harsh toward victims of crime, rather he is facing the reality of the situation.
07 Apr 2013, 1:09 pm
ShelbyGt500 wrote:
Lilya wrote:
uwmonkdm wrote:
Rape/molestation victim
I found especially this one unfairly harsh. You do realize how many women get at least molested in their lifetime? Besides, if your girlfriend would be raped when in a relationship with her, would you dump her because of that?
I think the guy who wrote this is in Canada. In North America, where I am located, the general population of women is predominately anti-male. It is very easy for a North American woman to generalize a single incident with one man into general mistrust and hatred toward all men in a way the preempts a successful relationship. There is an "every man should be regarded as a potential rapist" undercurrent within Feminism. I suspect he is not trying to be harsh toward victims of crime, rather he is facing the reality of the situation.
So? He just named a list of exclusion criteria, which I find utterly ret*d. There are always amazing people that are not going to fit one or two of those criteria.
I study psychology, Many rape victims around the world have trust issues, but many of them can overcome these problems for a large part and even become amazing partners if they have recieved proper therapy and help in the past. Why would you stigmatise a whole diverse group?
07 Apr 2013, 1:20 pm
Cafeaulait wrote:
ShelbyGt500 wrote:
Lilya wrote:
uwmonkdm wrote:
Rape/molestation victim
I found especially this one unfairly harsh. You do realize how many women get at least molested in their lifetime? Besides, if your girlfriend would be raped when in a relationship with her, would you dump her because of that?
I think the guy who wrote this is in Canada. In North America, where I am located, the general population of women is predominately anti-male. It is very easy for a North American woman to generalize a single incident with one man into general mistrust and hatred toward all men in a way the preempts a successful relationship. There is an "every man should be regarded as a potential rapist" undercurrent within Feminism. I suspect he is not trying to be harsh toward victims of crime, rather he is facing the reality of the situation.
So? He just named a list of exclusion criteria, which I find utterly ret*d. There are always amazing people that are not going to fit one or two of those criteria.
I study psychology, Many rape victims around the world have trust issues, but many of them can overcome these problems for a large part and even become amazing partners if they have recieved proper therapy and help in the past. Why would you stigmatise a whole diverse group?
^^^^ This.
I am a rape victim myself and I don't know any young woman who hasn't been sexually harassed during their lives. This has never prevented me from having a loving, trusting relationship and have a lot of wonderful male friends and an active dating and sex life. This is also the case with any female friend that I have.
Frankly, I find generalizing that all molested women are "undateable" due to events they can't have had any influence on just as stupid as generalizing that all men are rapists.
07 Apr 2013, 1:26 pm
Cafeaulait wrote:
ShelbyGt500 wrote:
Lilya wrote:
uwmonkdm wrote:
Rape/molestation victim
I found especially this one unfairly harsh. You do realize how many women get at least molested in their lifetime? Besides, if your girlfriend would be raped when in a relationship with her, would you dump her because of that?
I think the guy who wrote this is in Canada. In North America, where I am located, the general population of women is predominately anti-male. It is very easy for a North American woman to generalize a single incident with one man into general mistrust and hatred toward all men in a way the preempts a successful relationship. There is an "every man should be regarded as a potential rapist" undercurrent within Feminism. I suspect he is not trying to be harsh toward victims of crime, rather he is facing the reality of the situation.
So? He just named a list of exclusion criteria, which I find utterly ret*d. There are always amazing people that are not going to fit one or two of those criteria.
I study psychology, Many rape victims around the world have trust issues, but many of them can overcome these problems for a large part and even become amazing partners if they have recieved proper therapy and help in the past. Why would you stigmatise a whole diverse group?
Cafeaulait and Lilya,
My point is local culture has an effect. If the general population of women in a region is culturally distrustful of men and a member of that culture is raped, the culture will actually work against any therapy intended to allow the victim to gain trust. Note that I didn't say "regain trust," because, as a cultural characteristic, there is little, if any, initial trust among North American women. In other regions with different cultures, recovery may be more successful.
And, by commenting on a single item, I'm not implicitly addressing or supporting his entire list of his objections.
Last edited by ShelbyGt500 on 07 Apr 2013, 1:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
07 Apr 2013, 1:27 pm
Fnord wrote:
Abusive
Addicted (drugs, gambling, internet, et cetera)
Always right
Ambitionless
Arrogant
Bad breath
Bad teeth
Bedridden
Body odor
Born male
Bossy
Bullying
Compulsive
Conceited
Controlling
Depressive disorder (any)
Desperate
Diabetic
Disorganized
Extreme political views
Extreme religious views
Facial hair
Fake (in any way)
Feminazi
Feminista
Fundamentalist
Hateful
Humorless
Hypocritical
Idolizes/worships her father
Ignorant
Immature
Impatient
Indiscreet piercings
Indiscreet tattoos
Insecure
Intrusive
Irresponsible
Kids from more than one father
Liar
Makeup in layers
Manipulative
Masculine
Murderer
Narcissistic/vain
Not over past relationships
Obese
Obsessive
Petty
Porn "actress"
Possessive
Prison record
Provocative fashion sense
Racist
Sarcastic
Schizophrenic
Self-Righteous
Selfish
Sexist
Solipsistic
Spiteful
Tobacco use (any)
Unemployable
Unhappy with everything (chronic complainer)
Unintelligent
Unsympathetic
Victim of everything
Wheelchair-bound
Addicted (drugs, gambling, internet, et cetera)
Always right
Ambitionless
Arrogant
Bad breath
Bad teeth
Bedridden
Body odor
Born male
Bossy
Bullying
Compulsive
Conceited
Controlling
Depressive disorder (any)
Desperate
Diabetic
Disorganized
Extreme political views
Extreme religious views
Facial hair
Fake (in any way)
Feminazi
Feminista
Fundamentalist
Hateful
Humorless
Hypocritical
Idolizes/worships her father
Ignorant
Immature
Impatient
Indiscreet piercings
Indiscreet tattoos
Insecure
Intrusive
Irresponsible
Kids from more than one father
Liar
Makeup in layers
Manipulative
Masculine
Murderer
Narcissistic/vain
Not over past relationships
Obese
Obsessive
Petty
Porn "actress"
Possessive
Prison record
Provocative fashion sense
Racist
Sarcastic
Schizophrenic
Self-Righteous
Selfish
Sexist
Solipsistic
Spiteful
Tobacco use (any)
Unemployable
Unhappy with everything (chronic complainer)
Unintelligent
Unsympathetic
Victim of everything
Wheelchair-bound
Sorry, but this thread is hilarious..
"Guided tour to nasty women - dictionary included"
BooToMostStuff
Snowy Owl
Joined: 1 Mar 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 130
Location: Bolton, England, UK, Europe, Earth
07 Apr 2013, 1:31 pm
07 Apr 2013, 1:35 pm
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
07 Apr 2013, 1:45 pm
^ I'm with unwonkdm on this one - his deal breakers are his deal breakers for whatever his personal reasons are.
Whether they're to do with aesthetics, age, religion, personality, neuro-type or mental health issues or anything under the sun isn't really for anyone else to criticize. Deal breakers are highly personal and people don't really need to provide any rational or logical explanation for them to others. They just have to make sense to you, and that's it.
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| What is the deal with Mark Robinson? |
09 Nov 2024, 3:49 am |
| How do you deal with differences betwn you and your partner? |
14 Nov 2024, 6:21 am |
