The REAL reason why you don't have a girlfriend/wife
MXH
Veteran
Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain
MacDragard wrote:
Jono wrote:
MacDragard wrote:
Is it because you have aspergers? Nope.
Actually, it partly is. That doesn't mean that you can't learn to improve your social skills to get one in the future but it doesn't change the diagnostic for Asperger's.
Diagnosis is irrelevant. Most people on here however use their diagnosis as an excuse to just sit on their asses all day and b***h on WP about how much their lives suck because they aren't in a relationship, and they blame it on AS, which is completely false, yet it prevents them from taking action.
Ummm... no. It is very relevant. Why is it? Because there's tons of males here who have the will to go out and look for a mate, who are als realistic in choice, Tec but they have absolutely no clue on how to read someone or to communicate desire. You're choosing to blanket statement all males for the same 8 guys that make all the threads here
MacDragard wrote:
Jono wrote:
MacDragard wrote:
Is it because you have aspergers? Nope.
Actually, it partly is. That doesn't mean that you can't learn to improve your social skills to get one in the future but it doesn't change the diagnostic for Asperger's.
Diagnosis is irrelevant. Most people on here however use their diagnosis as an excuse to just sit on their asses all day and b***h on WP about how much their lives suck because they aren't in a relationship, and they blame it on AS, which is completely false, yet it prevents them from taking action.
I agree wholeheartedly, i sometimes think that we get alot of people bandwagon themselves with us.. along with the (asexual + other socially awkward) communities, not saying people aren't aspies (still hate that term) but its a pretty lame excuse "why don't nts like us", i think people on the whole prefer to blame a 3rd party than to actually put the effort in.
MacDragard wrote:
Diagnosis is irrelevant. Most people on here however use their diagnosis as an excuse to just sit on their asses all day and b***h on WP about how much their lives suck because they aren't in a relationship, and they blame it on AS, which is completely false, yet it prevents them from taking action.
hold on there. There are alot of aspie men that actual do go out there, and do try to get dates but fail.
not all dateless men are the shy or nervous around women type. Not all are computer nerds, who sit on the computer all day complaining
on WP. and not all dateless men are only chase after supermodels.
People here are stuck on the shy and lazy type, but yet seem ignore guys like me and others, who do go out and put up in effort
to met the ladies, so please, don't think we don't ever try.
MXH wrote:
MacDragard wrote:
Jono wrote:
MacDragard wrote:
Is it because you have aspergers? Nope.
Actually, it partly is. That doesn't mean that you can't learn to improve your social skills to get one in the future but it doesn't change the diagnostic for Asperger's.
Diagnosis is irrelevant. Most people on here however use their diagnosis as an excuse to just sit on their asses all day and b***h on WP about how much their lives suck because they aren't in a relationship, and they blame it on AS, which is completely false, yet it prevents them from taking action.
Ummm... no. It is very relevant. Why is it? Because there's tons of males here who have the will to go out and look for a mate, who are als realistic in choice, Tec but they have absolutely no clue on how to read someone or to communicate desire. You're choosing to blanket statement all males for the same 8 guys that make all the threads here
And why can't said guys read up on the subject and learn about it?
MXH
Veteran
Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain
MacDragard wrote:
MXH wrote:
MacDragard wrote:
Jono wrote:
MacDragard wrote:
Is it because you have aspergers? Nope.
Actually, it partly is. That doesn't mean that you can't learn to improve your social skills to get one in the future but it doesn't change the diagnostic for Asperger's.
Diagnosis is irrelevant. Most people on here however use their diagnosis as an excuse to just sit on their asses all day and b***h on WP about how much their lives suck because they aren't in a relationship, and they blame it on AS, which is completely false, yet it prevents them from taking action.
Ummm... no. It is very relevant. Why is it? Because there's tons of males here who have the will to go out and look for a mate, who are als realistic in choice, Tec but they have absolutely no clue on how to read someone or to communicate desire. You're choosing to blanket statement all males for the same 8 guys that make all the threads here
And why can't said guys read up on the subject and learn about it?
That's what they are bloody here for, not to hear someone insulting them like your first post did. Hell, in case you didn't notice most threads here are asking for advice or giving advice. Very little are truly complaining.
MXH wrote:
MacDragard wrote:
MXH wrote:
MacDragard wrote:
Jono wrote:
MacDragard wrote:
Is it because you have aspergers? Nope.
Actually, it partly is. That doesn't mean that you can't learn to improve your social skills to get one in the future but it doesn't change the diagnostic for Asperger's.
Diagnosis is irrelevant. Most people on here however use their diagnosis as an excuse to just sit on their asses all day and b***h on WP about how much their lives suck because they aren't in a relationship, and they blame it on AS, which is completely false, yet it prevents them from taking action.
Ummm... no. It is very relevant. Why is it? Because there's tons of males here who have the will to go out and look for a mate, who are als realistic in choice, Tec but they have absolutely no clue on how to read someone or to communicate desire. You're choosing to blanket statement all males for the same 8 guys that make all the threads here
And why can't said guys read up on the subject and learn about it?
That's what they are bloody here for, not to hear someone insulting them like your first post did. Hell, in case you didn't notice most threads here are asking for advice or giving advice. Very little are truly complaining.
I'm talking about books and credible sources; not some stupid ass message board where most people bond by their misery.
I'm not here to insult, and if I am then I'm not as harsh as most people on here are on themselves.
MacDragard wrote:
My life experience disproves your theories. If you were really getting rejected as often as you say you do or as often as you think it takes someone to go crazy, you would realize that a) receiving one or a couple rejections on one night is more painful than receiving, say, 50 because it gets to a point where you're used to it; [1]and b) You'll only go insane if you do the same exact thing over and over and expect different results.
As far as your take on positive thinking goes, let me ask this - Are you more likely to believe it when someone says something negative about you regardless of whether it's actually true or not? If so, how is that any different than believing in the positive? [2] It's the same exact thing, but you are more likely to believe what's negative because you view your life as negative - Negative is your current identity and this you are attracted to the negative.
As far as the comparisons go, yes people will compare you and they may compare you unfairly, but that is none of your business. [3] Different people have preferences, and I'm sure there are things about you that people see in a more positive light when compared to others (even if you deny it). My point was you shouldn't be constantly comparing yourself to others, because that is counterproductive when it comes to reaching goals because you will then never be satisfied with what you have despite making great accomplishments. Someone will always be better than you in whatever, and you shouldn't let that hinder you.
As far as your take on positive thinking goes, let me ask this - Are you more likely to believe it when someone says something negative about you regardless of whether it's actually true or not? If so, how is that any different than believing in the positive? [2] It's the same exact thing, but you are more likely to believe what's negative because you view your life as negative - Negative is your current identity and this you are attracted to the negative.
As far as the comparisons go, yes people will compare you and they may compare you unfairly, but that is none of your business. [3] Different people have preferences, and I'm sure there are things about you that people see in a more positive light when compared to others (even if you deny it). My point was you shouldn't be constantly comparing yourself to others, because that is counterproductive when it comes to reaching goals because you will then never be satisfied with what you have despite making great accomplishments. Someone will always be better than you in whatever, and you shouldn't let that hinder you.
[1] Not in my experience. I had moments in my life, when younger, with quite poor social skills. And this is not like you say.
O course, a very different thing is shifting between rejections and successes (as most of people). A rejection doesn't matter too much, but when you're doing wrong and you don't exactly what, every fail is the a confirmation of it. And the sense of impotence, the uncertainty about whether you can fix it, is something that hurts too much.
This popular 'positivism' seems to me like a philosophy about how to endure hunger thought up by somebody whose biggest experience with hunger is going to bed without dinner.
[2] I'm an aspie that has lived in a NT world without knowing about Aspergers for years. Everytime somebody said something about me -figuring out me in a NT way, of course-, he/she was wrong. So right now I really don't care about what people say, neither positive nor negative. I listen as politely as possible, but don't really pay much attention on. I can't answer your question in an constructive way with regard to debate.
[3] On the contrary, this is your business. If you're -for example- trying to get laid by a woman (or going out with her), how you come out of this comparison is something that falls on you.
Of course, one thing is to compare yourself when pursuing a specific goal, so you know which are your chances to score and where are your weaknesses, and another very different thing is to compare yourself just because.
_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)
Greb wrote:
Of course, one thing is to compare yourself when pursuing a specific goal, so you know which are your chances to score and where are your weaknesses, and another very different thing is to compare yourself just because.
Very interesting way of putting it. I feel I'm OK at accomplishing a scientific goal, as I can at least put everything in perspective.
Of course turning people into "scientific goals" makes you into a bit of a sociopath.
MacDragard wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
Oh yes, a disorder that causes significant impairs in social skills will have no impact whatsoever on romantic success. Of course.
Says the person who never tried, or tried a few times and gave up after.
Says the person who has actually been in a relationship before. So much for your assumptions.
Januaryman, you are correct, I'm not a lesbian.
Quote:
Diagnosis is irrelevant.
Thank you, Seven of Nine.
_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I
1000Knives wrote:
Greb wrote:
Of course, one thing is to compare yourself when pursuing a specific goal, so you know which are your chances to score and where are your weaknesses, and another very different thing is to compare yourself just because.
Very interesting way of putting it. I feel I'm OK at accomplishing a scientific goal, as I can at least put everything in perspective.
Of course turning people into "scientific goals" makes you into a bit of a sociopath.
I don't think so. Sociopathy is about lack of empathy, not about analyzing coldly a situation.
Of couse, lacking of empathy involves cold analyzing, but cold analyzing doesn't involve necessarily lack of empathy.
In my opinion asperger and sociopathy have features that produce a similar look (so they're often mixed up), but that are very different in nature. Usually people with asperger are:
(1) Deadly honest => quite unpassionate and straightforward analyses.
(2) Lacking of social skills => unempathic appearance (I remark: appearance).
If you combine unpassionate analyses and unempathic appearance the outcome can look as sociopathic lack of empathy, but it is not.
_________________
1 part of Asperger | 1 part of OCD | 2 parts of ADHD / APD / GT-LD / 2e
And finally, another part of secret spices :^)
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,047
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Seven of Nine??
From Star Trek.
Just Google "Seven of Nine" and "is irrelevant" together and you'll see what I'm talking about.
_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,047
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Advice regarding girlfriend |
30 Oct 2024, 8:33 am |
My brother attracted to his mates girlfriend |
04 Oct 2024, 7:13 pm |
Republican makes Tammy Baldwin’s girlfriend an issue |
02 Nov 2024, 5:14 pm |
The Real Reasons Why People Become Atheists |
02 Sep 2024, 1:41 am |