leafplant wrote:
octobertiger wrote:
You really are being pedantic (how dare you make me think)
If I had a penny for every time someone said that to me..
octobertiger wrote:
leafplant wrote:
when we start assigning value to the 'craving of attention', that's when standards will come into play. For now, nobody has given it a value. Call it cry for help and it's the same thing dressed in socially acceptable clothes.
Can you explain this, please?
Isn't it obvious??
Craving for attention is a symptom of some underlying cause. Craving for attention in and of itself has no intrinsic value, other than what we, the 'society' decide to place on it. For some, craving for attention = bad; for others, craving for attention = needs a hug etc. We haven't collectively agreed on what value to assign OPs craving for attention on this occasion, so at the moment it's still up in the air - a symptom of something, we know not what.
Was that any better?
I'd like to comment, but we're going off topic
Okay, well if you insist. Was that any better? Not bad. Nine, out of a hundred.
Craving for attention is a symptom of some underlying cause - yeah, existence.
Craving for attention in and of itself has no intrinsic value, other than what we, the 'society' decide to place on it. - wow, me like. That's so good I must have said that once. Can't think when - can't get the DeLorean door open to go find out. Bloody West Belfast trash.
For some, craving for attention = bad So you've just defiled the point you've made above, almost in the same breath. Oopsie.
Rest of it - yeah, existence. Actually, I agree. I'm looking forward to the collective agreement, too...