Consequences in "why to ask first"

Page 3 of 24 [ 374 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 24  Next

starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

27 Aug 2014, 5:37 pm

CommanderKeen wrote:
I didn't insinuate anything about you, but about the woman whom was being discussed making the accusations and other women being mad at the man being discussed in this thread. " I am not saying this is the case with starvingartist, but it does happen quite often." Insinuating, that you're probably not like that, but some women are. I guess you missed that part.


"I am not saying this is the case with starvingartist, but..."

yeah you're right, it's totes obvious that you weren't trying to imply anything about me.

/sarcasm.



tarantella64
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,850

27 Aug 2014, 5:54 pm

CommanderKeen wrote:
Persevero wrote:
I'm more worried about Social Justice Warriors bringing social organizations to their knees based on pure hearsay. It's f*****g disgusting how they feel it's okay to ruin a man's life because he MIGHT have done something unsavory - nobody knows the details but he's already ostracized and from what I've read she never was in any position where she couldn't say no - to sex they never had.

Zoe Quinn more recently, who paraded herself as a champion of social justice, was found to forge harassment claims for the release of a new game. When this was brought to light, Warriors from every which way have sent death threats and harassed those criticizing her very unprofessional behavior.

I'm not saying he's innocent, or that it's ok to heavily grope women without consent. I'm saying this culture of knee-jerk hatemongering is diminishing the seriousness of actual assaults by diluting them in potential vengeful allegations.

The moral of the OP is "Men be afraid, due process is optional. Stay away from women until you're sure they're not the kind of person who would ruin your life if things went south."

The comments on this inflammatory article are a good read: http://kotaku.com/a-different-way-to-re ... 1605542083

You know what else is a good read? To Kill a Mockingbird.

I say don't sexually harass someone because it's the wrong thing to do, not because you will completely surrender control of your life to the victim.

Pretty much this. Also keep in mind women who have gone through trauma, will be bias against men in a lot of cases. It's easy for women who have been sexually assaulted to view men as evil by default. I am not saying this is the case with starvingartist, but it does happen quite often. I had an ex girlfriend, whom is into polygamy. I had two girlfriends, she had two boyfriends. I was good friends with the other guy she was dating. She is bisexual, so she had girlfriends as well. Well I witnessed how nice she was to all her girlfriends, yet when it came to us (the guys) she was very mean. She even made the guy cry, just so she could get off on it. She was always talking about how she was raped, but yet at the same time would put herself in risky situations, like going to get the mail in her bra and panties and working outside at 2am. She also told me how she used to be an escort. Yes, I did make a huge mistake dating this person. Obviously most women who are raped don't act like her and dont put themselves in those kinds of situations. Rape is a terrible thing, but some women who get raped get really traumatized by it and develop this hatred towards men, some even become prostitutes. I've witnessed a few rape victims become prostitutes.


CK, this "women who are assaulted hate all men" thing is misogynistic. If you can't retract this yourself I'll ask a mod to do it for you.



tarantella64
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,850

27 Aug 2014, 5:56 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
starvingartist wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Tarantella, this case hasn't been proven yet; even if false accusations are rare this means nothing for how the court proceeds the case.


i think the accuser has already stated that she's not planning to press charges--she likely knows there would be no point as there is no physical evidence after this much time has passed. i don't think the cops consider panic attacks and other forms of psychological trauma as actual evidence of a crime like this....though perhaps they should. i don't know if you've ever had a panic attack, but it would be difficult to fake them i think just to get "satisfaction" from accusing someone of something they didn't do. so unless this woman is a highly manipulative psychopath, i think it's fair to give her the benefit of the doubt.

if you've ever had to deal with disclosing being a victim of sexual assault to friends and family you might understand why it's not something that women do lightly or easily, which is why false accusations don't happen more than they do. when i told my girlfriends what happened to me, two of them stopped speaking to me--i assume because they thought i was a slut and deserved it, but i'll never know for sure their reasoning as they never actually told me (cowards) but instead just stopped talking to me or taking my calls and mocked me to our other shared acquaintances. lots of people seem to think that when women come out as being survivors of sexual assault everyone around them just heaps sympathy on them--this is just not an accurate description of what happens for many survivors. often there is a lot of questioning and blaming of the victim for what happened to them. my own step-brother's response to me telling him i was raped at 18 was "well you know, 18 year old girls can be very naive." 8O

"yes, i was raped" is not a phrase women toss around carelessly for the sake of vengeance or for sympathy. sometimes just stating a truth out loud--especially an uncomfortable truth--can be liberating. this often can be reason enough for women to decide to talk about what happened to them. so unless you're a survivor of sexual assault yourself and have some idea of what this woman might be thinking, i don't think it's very fair to judge how or why she's chosen to disclose her story.


I will not going to discuss your case, we are talking about Max's case, they might not be the same.

Drama Psychos exist too, not just rapists, what if she was that kind of person who holds old grudges inside to the revenge point, I knew people like that. It is possible that she was deeply hurt by ditching her like that and years later she found out he became famous and successful and she was like "I am gonna destroy this bastard who abandoned me like this!" - it's just a possibility. If it is that case, then Max is the one who's victim for unfairly losing reputation. Your scenario (her being embarrassed to disclose it earlier) is also another possibility.

I can't side with anyone in this case because there's no evidence yet.

The thing is that you and tarantella are siding with her just simply because she said it happened - there's zero evidence of the whole thing.


-


False rape and molestation accusations are actually extremely rare, and that's in part because of the vicious attacks the accusers face when they finally come forward and say what's happened. It's not a thing women do for sport. Temkin himself got about as far as saying "well I didn't hear a no" and left it at that.



starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

27 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm

Persevero wrote:
One of my best friends is black :lol:


Sorry, that just immediately came to mind.

Anywho, who has read "to kill a mockingbird" around here?


didn't we all read it in school?--your point being.... oh that's right, there's a false rape allegation in that. i see what you did there. clever you.



tarantella64
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,850

27 Aug 2014, 6:08 pm

AlexanderDantes wrote:
[
If there's no evidence, the case should simply be dropped, it's wrong to vilify someone that may not be able to read signals and perhaps he is declined socially so I think a certain amount of empathy should be taken into the court room unless he physically forced himself upon the girls whilst they were screaming no, signals can be subtle.


Signals can be subtle: so wait, a genius at reading "yes please kiss/etc. me" is suddenly oblivious when the signal is "I'm not so into this, it's not really what I want"?

Yeah. This is why asking is the thing to do.

There is no case in any court of law. There is very much a case in the court of this guy's professional community, where there is apparently some understanding of what sexual assaults are (note, AD, that it's a considerably broader range than "physically forced himself") and that someone who not only does such things but can't come forward and admit that it's harmful isn't someone they want amongst them.

Likewise the sci writing guy has not been accused in any court of law. But it'll be a long time, if ever, before he works in science writing again. His mere presence is enough to torpedo any project. That's what you get for coming on to women who're just there to work when you're in the position of power, being all creepy and casting-couch at them. I don't know what his family is doing for money these days as his wife was on disability. My guess is the kids have had to revise their college plans. It's too bad, too -- it was really a brilliant career he screwed up for himself. Managed to hurt a lot of other people along theh way.

You can bet that this will happen more and more often. Just grabbing and taking -- doesn't matter how spontaneous and romantic you might think you're being, might wind up very expensive for you.

I hear that we've got these outraged cries again to the effect that it won't be safe for men to breathe, let alone get next to a woman. I just adore the relentlessness of sidestepping and ignoring the obvious solution:

Ask the lady first if it's okay.

Y'all are willing to imagine Male Armageddon before you're willing to contemplate the horrors of asking before touching. Well -- have it your way, then.



Persevero
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 245

27 Aug 2014, 6:47 pm

starvingartist wrote:
Persevero wrote:
One of my best friends is black :lol:


Sorry, that just immediately came to mind.

Anywho, who has read "to kill a mockingbird" around here?


didn't we all read it in school?--your point being.... oh that's right, there's a false rape allegation in that. i see what you did there. clever you.

More to it than that. Every villager's convinced the accused did because he's black. It couldnt have possibly been a white woman lying

In Temkin's case he's obviously guilty because he's a male public figure on the internet. Get to lynchin' gender equalitists!



Persevero
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 245

27 Aug 2014, 6:52 pm

tarantella64 wrote:
CommanderKeen wrote:
Persevero wrote:
I'm more worried about Social Justice Warriors bringing social organizations to their knees based on pure hearsay. It's f*****g disgusting how they feel it's okay to ruin a man's life because he MIGHT have done something unsavory - nobody knows the details but he's already ostracized and from what I've read she never was in any position where she couldn't say no - to sex they never had.

Zoe Quinn more recently, who paraded herself as a champion of social justice, was found to forge harassment claims for the release of a new game. When this was brought to light, Warriors from every which way have sent death threats and harassed those criticizing her very unprofessional behavior.

I'm not saying he's innocent, or that it's ok to heavily grope women without consent. I'm saying this culture of knee-jerk hatemongering is diminishing the seriousness of actual assaults by diluting them in potential vengeful allegations.

The moral of the OP is "Men be afraid, due process is optional. Stay away from women until you're sure they're not the kind of person who would ruin your life if things went south."

The comments on this inflammatory article are a good read: http://kotaku.com/a-different-way-to-re ... 1605542083

You know what else is a good read? To Kill a Mockingbird.

I say don't sexually harass someone because it's the wrong thing to do, not because you will completely surrender control of your life to the victim.

Pretty much this. Also keep in mind women who have gone through trauma, will be bias against men in a lot of cases. It's easy for women who have been sexually assaulted to view men as evil by default. I am not saying this is the case with starvingartist, but it does happen quite often. I had an ex girlfriend, whom is into polygamy. I had two girlfriends, she had two boyfriends. I was good friends with the other guy she was dating. She is bisexual, so she had girlfriends as well. Well I witnessed how nice she was to all her girlfriends, yet when it came to us (the guys) she was very mean. She even made the guy cry, just so she could get off on it. She was always talking about how she was raped, but yet at the same time would put herself in risky situations, like going to get the mail in her bra and panties and working outside at 2am. She also told me how she used to be an escort. Yes, I did make a huge mistake dating this person. Obviously most women who are raped don't act like her and dont put themselves in those kinds of situations. Rape is a terrible thing, but some women who get raped get really traumatized by it and develop this hatred towards men, some even become prostitutes. I've witnessed a few rape victims become prostitutes.


CK, this "women who are assaulted hate all men" thing is misogynistic. If you can't retract this yourself I'll ask a mod to do it for you.

Please retract the misandrist "Max Temkin had this coming" from your thread you giant hypocrite.

Last tarantella thread I'm going to post in unless they go on a tangent



billiscool
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Feb 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,989

27 Aug 2014, 6:57 pm

tarantella64 wrote:

I hear that we've got these outraged cries again to the effect that it won't be safe for men to breathe, let alone get next to a woman. I just adore the relentlessness of sidestepping and ignoring the obvious solution:

Ask the lady first if it's okay.

Y'all are willing to imagine Male Armageddon before you're willing to contemplate the horrors of asking before touching. Well -- have it your way, then.


My lady friend kissed me on the lips without permission.Was she in the wrong?

at a party once.A girl wrap her legs around me without
permission.Was she in the wrong? should she had ask.



Eureka13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,058
Location: The wilds of Colorado

27 Aug 2014, 7:49 pm

^^ Yes, she should have asked. It *does* work both ways.



CommanderKeen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2014
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,138

27 Aug 2014, 7:56 pm

starvingartist wrote:
CommanderKeen wrote:
I didn't insinuate anything about you, but about the woman whom was being discussed making the accusations and other women being mad at the man being discussed in this thread. " I am not saying this is the case with starvingartist, but it does happen quite often." Insinuating, that you're probably not like that, but some women are. I guess you missed that part.


"I am not saying this is the case with starvingartist, but..."

yeah you're right, it's totes obvious that you weren't trying to imply anything about me.

/sarcasm.

Well believe what you want, I'm going to go cry in the corner and loose so much sleep over your comment. /sarcasm.



tarantella64
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,850

27 Aug 2014, 8:01 pm

Eureka13 wrote:
^^ Yes, she should have asked. It *does* work both ways.


Very much so. Bodies belong to the people living in them. If it's not yours, ask before touching, at least until there's an understanding worked out between the two of you.



CommanderKeen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2014
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,138

27 Aug 2014, 8:09 pm

tarantella64 wrote:
CommanderKeen wrote:
Persevero wrote:
I'm more worried about Social Justice Warriors bringing social organizations to their knees based on pure hearsay. It's f*****g disgusting how they feel it's okay to ruin a man's life because he MIGHT have done something unsavory - nobody knows the details but he's already ostracized and from what I've read she never was in any position where she couldn't say no - to sex they never had.

Zoe Quinn more recently, who paraded herself as a champion of social justice, was found to forge harassment claims for the release of a new game. When this was brought to light, Warriors from every which way have sent death threats and harassed those criticizing her very unprofessional behavior.

I'm not saying he's innocent, or that it's ok to heavily grope women without consent. I'm saying this culture of knee-jerk hatemongering is diminishing the seriousness of actual assaults by diluting them in potential vengeful allegations.

The moral of the OP is "Men be afraid, due process is optional. Stay away from women until you're sure they're not the kind of person who would ruin your life if things went south."

The comments on this inflammatory article are a good read: http://kotaku.com/a-different-way-to-re ... 1605542083

You know what else is a good read? To Kill a Mockingbird.

I say don't sexually harass someone because it's the wrong thing to do, not because you will completely surrender control of your life to the victim.

Pretty much this. Also keep in mind women who have gone through trauma, will be bias against men in a lot of cases. It's easy for women who have been sexually assaulted to view men as evil by default. I am not saying this is the case with starvingartist, but it does happen quite often. I had an ex girlfriend, whom is into polygamy. I had two girlfriends, she had two boyfriends. I was good friends with the other guy she was dating. She is bisexual, so she had girlfriends as well. Well I witnessed how nice she was to all her girlfriends, yet when it came to us (the guys) she was very mean. She even made the guy cry, just so she could get off on it. She was always talking about how she was raped, but yet at the same time would put herself in risky situations, like going to get the mail in her bra and panties and working outside at 2am. She also told me how she used to be an escort. Yes, I did make a huge mistake dating this person. Obviously most women who are raped don't act like her and dont put themselves in those kinds of situations. Rape is a terrible thing, but some women who get raped get really traumatized by it and develop this hatred towards men, some even become prostitutes. I've witnessed a few rape victims become prostitutes.


CK, this "women who are assaulted hate all men" thing is misogynistic. If you can't retract this yourself I'll ask a mod to do it for you.

Yes, because I implied all rape victim are like that. Some women are mean, oh that's misogynistic, some women are prostitutes, oh that's misogynistic. All this is utterly ridiculous. Go ahead a tell a mod. Honestly if I get banned, it gives me an excuse not to look at comments like this anymore. Actually please report me to a mod, I want you to. I guess it's misogynistic to even acknowledge people like my ex girlfriend even exist. A lot of the men on this forum act like women are radioactive. As if asking a girl out is up there with grabbing her ass. It's all ridiculous, but it's no wonder some of the males on this forum feel that way, if they come on here and read some of the absurd things some member on this forum say, like you should ask permission before you kiss a girl, if you're out on a date with them. I've seen bitterness from both genders on this forum and the Hippocratic is unreal.



CommanderKeen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2014
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,138

27 Aug 2014, 8:12 pm

tarantella64 wrote:
Eureka13 wrote:
^^ Yes, she should have asked. It *does* work both ways.


Very much so. Bodies belong to the people living in them. If it's not yours, ask before touching, at least until there's an understanding worked out between the two of you.

I've asked to kiss girls on dates and they've told me later that ruined the date for them. An ex of mine even told me to not ask.



tarantella64
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,850

27 Aug 2014, 8:15 pm

CK, come on. Yes, you took starvingartist out of it, but in a single breath you're saying women who're in their underwear are asking to be raped (which is wrong) and that in general the word of an abused woman, when it comes to accusations against men, probably aren't worth much because they're man-haters (which is not only wrong but manages to victimise the same women twice). Both these things are deeply misogynist.

There's nothing misandrist about the Temkin case. If you go mauling a chick and figuring it's okay because, well, even though she's not saying "ride 'em, cowboy", she's not trying to fight you off, and one day she comes forward and tells everyone what you did and how it affected her, and you waffle and issue a non-apology like "I'm sorry if she feels hurt", and people draw back from you, you've pretty much earned it. He could've saved himself quite a lot of trouble, too, simply by taking responsibility and saying something like, "Yes, it was totally wrong. And, as I know now, harmful. The fact that I was a very young, naive idiot doesn't change how harmful it was, and I'm genuinely sorry. And here's what I'm going to do to show that I understand how serious this is and to help make sure other young people are aware of why that's harmful and what to do instead." And then actually followed up. His life would be quite different now if he'd done those things.



tarantella64
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,850

27 Aug 2014, 8:17 pm

CommanderKeen wrote:
tarantella64 wrote:
Eureka13 wrote:
^^ Yes, she should have asked. It *does* work both ways.


Very much so. Bodies belong to the people living in them. If it's not yours, ask before touching, at least until there's an understanding worked out between the two of you.

I've asked to kiss girls on dates and they've told me later that ruined the date for them. An ex of mine even told me to not ask.


yes, we've been over that repeatedly. Doesn't change anything.



starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

27 Aug 2014, 8:20 pm

CommanderKeen wrote:
tarantella64 wrote:
CommanderKeen wrote:
Pretty much this. Also keep in mind women who have gone through trauma, will be bias against men in a lot of cases. It's easy for women who have been sexually assaulted to view men as evil by default. I am not saying this is the case with starvingartist, but it does happen quite often. I had an ex girlfriend, whom is into polygamy. I had two girlfriends, she had two boyfriends. I was good friends with the other guy she was dating. She is bisexual, so she had girlfriends as well. Well I witnessed how nice she was to all her girlfriends, yet when it came to us (the guys) she was very mean. She even made the guy cry, just so she could get off on it. She was always talking about how she was raped, but yet at the same time would put herself in risky situations, like going to get the mail in her bra and panties and working outside at 2am. She also told me how she used to be an escort. Yes, I did make a huge mistake dating this person. Obviously most women who are raped don't act like her and dont put themselves in those kinds of situations. Rape is a terrible thing, but some women who get raped get really traumatized by it and develop this hatred towards men, some even become prostitutes. I've witnessed a few rape victims become prostitutes.


CK, this "women who are assaulted hate all men" thing is misogynistic. If you can't retract this yourself I'll ask a mod to do it for you.

Yes, because I implied all rape victim are like that. Some women are mean, oh that's misogynistic, some women are prostitutes, oh that's misogynistic. All this is utterly ridiculous. Go ahead a tell a mod. Honestly if I get banned, it gives me an excuse not to look at comments like this anymore. Actually please report me to a mod, I want you to. I guess it's misogynistic to even acknowledge people like my ex girlfriend even exist. A lot of the men on this forum act like women are radioactive. As if asking a girl out is up there with grabbing her ass. It's all ridiculous, but it's no wonder some of the males on this forum feel that way, if they come on here and read some of the absurd things some member on this forum say, like you should ask permission before you kiss a girl, if you're out on a date with them. I've seen bitterness from both genders on this forum and the Hippocratic is unreal.


implying that sexual assault survivors are embittered "damaged goods" is not at all a misogynistic cliché. :roll:

just admit you stepped in it talking about something you don't really understand.

edited* to fix quotes