Is life worth living when you're too ugly for girls?

Post Reply New Topic

That's hilarious. The guys on this forum are having sex with hookers because no girl will have sex with them for free. Being with a girl "like that"'s clearly not a viable option.

A judgy prude would be dumping someone because you're not their first significant other or because they've had sex with more people than you. That's irrational -- "how dare you have slept with guys a decade before you even met me!", "Seven?!?"). See: Chasing Amy -- but it's also a free country. And if you're, like, 25+ taking that attitude tends to eliminate pretty much anybody who started dating in high school, ie the 85% of folks lost their virginity by age 18 or so, as per CDC stats. (I've been dumped for this exact reason + good riddance to tat dude!).

Dumping a guy who paid for sex doesn't necessarily make them a judgy prude -- it makes them a person who'd prefer not to be with someone who regards sex (and, by extension, women) as a commodity available for purchase. .

No one is too ugly for girls.

There is no such collective as 'girls'. Don't dismiss half the world's population based on your experiences with a small number of females.

Last edited by Nuthatchnut on 05 Oct 2015, 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

What if you know you're such a vile and repulsive guy noöne will ever voluntarily have sex with you? No point in "not conceding" it.

I have no intention of ever hiring a prostitute, but this is by no means the reason.

Having children is vastly overrated.

It's actually pretty cool. I wish I had kids!

First off don't use that tone with me, I'm not your little brother. Basically here you're saying that these guys never in their life will have the chance for a relationship.

A person like this would be a judgy prude. It doesn't mean that a person who dumps a guy cause he paid for sex in the past is not a judgy prude.

That "by exstention" is so false. Women are not the same thing as sex (nor is love). He gives money to a girl and then they have CONSENSUAL sex. He doesn't buy a woman. She does it of her own free will and is not a slave, what you say is so twisted. If I wanted to sleep with a prostitute, I wouldn't really care about these prudes being judgy on me, especially if it happened where prostitution is legal.

In my one-of-a-kind experiment viewtopic.php?t=286702 it shows that some women are also willing to pay for a hooker/stripper....provided that he promoted himself right .

Were they about to buy me?

I didn't say any man on this forum was destined never to have a proper relationship - I don't know them + my crystal ball is in the shop .

The men who elect to hire hookers or advocate for guys on this board to hire hookers THEMSELVES are saying no girl would sleep with them for free, so hiring a hooker is how they get sex. Because for THEM to get laid requires paying $$$.

Go Google some stats on women in the sex trade in the US - there's a whole lot of non-voluntary + no other options going on.

You're entitled to think I'm a judgy prude for being repulsed by any man who has ever paid for sex + to refuse to date me on that basis.

Ain't freedom grand?

I never told them to look for hookers, I'm just defending them against people who look down on them. Also the fact that they can't get a gf today doesn't mean that they won't be able after some time.

Infact I am talking about women who do it because they want, they exist. Especially where it is legal. I think if a guy does it, he should make sure she is doing it because she wants to.

Of course I'm entitled to that. And the fact that you said offensive things to these guys only makes it worse.

This thread seems to have degenerated too much into bickering.