shadexiii wrote:
If you don't have money, you want it, and hate those who don't appreciate it.
Not sure what you mean by "don't have money." Either way, I've been so poor that
I was on the street, so I've qualified. I don't think that I've ever hated anyone for
not appreciating what they had. Nor do I think that I would have traded what
I had, for what they did. I'm almost always closer to the sublime than
anyone else that I know.
Quote:
If you do have money, it is quite possible to hate it. I guess you could call it a "luxury," though luxuries are usually associated with desirable extras.
It is possible to despise it it you don't have it too.
Quote:
Sure, it is nice to have money. It is also nice to have people with money providing for you. It can be a real pain when people assume that, because of them, you are rich, and you can afford to spend more money on their behalf. Is that as big of a difficulty as, say, starvation, or not having a roof over your head? Well, no. That being said, comparing misfortunes is a silly business.
Is this any different than expecting that because you have time,
or the capability to love, that you can afford to spend these things
on the person? I see no fundamental difference. Not giving of what
you can is selfishness. I can tolerate someone being selfish with
strangers, but I don't think that I'd have an easy time with someone
who was very selfish, and within a relationship with me. That's not to
say that they would have to be ultimately giving, but they should give
what they can - as I do.