The top 10 rejection lines given by women.
Are you certain it's not an excuse to cover up some other reason? I can't
imagine dumping somebody I'm otherwise completely smitten with, just because of the date on his birth certificate.
Not dumping - that's the point. If they became interested
enough that my sparkling personality showed through
(as opposed to just grumbling at them to get the ****
away ), then perhaps they'd tolerate. But, one of
the first things that they ask this dour curmudgeon is
age. Always a bad move, since it opens them up for
my tasteless humor - but there it is.
Dude, you aren't dateable anyway, you are married, right? Legally? Was that you? I jump around talking to people in PM and on different forums and I'm still confused. I suppose it will get better with time.
Secondly, if you omit or evade the age question, one wonders what else was omitted? Hmm? Omission of facts can still be lying. If you know that the person is interested only in someone within a few years of their own age, and you don't tell them, you are lying.
Is there any real evidence of this "sparkling personality"? I don't get that feeling at all, I see the "dour curmudgeon" though. If it wasn't for the bird avatar...
What does my marriage have to do with anything?
Anyhow, for all I know, she may be dead.
But, it's not as though I lie. They ask, and I tell them
"older than you think," or something similar. If they try
and push the issue, I simply get more ridiculous. The point
is, given the way that I express it, they assume I'm a good
10 years younger than the truth, which fits their desires, usually.
Nah. Nothing sparkling about it. I am, and always have been,
an old grump. But, some tend to find it amusing, at the least.
If I am celibate (I keep wanting to write "celebrate" and there isn't anything TO celebrate, LOL), none of the other things are going work, right? I'm just not going to have sex with anyone. Not until I have thought about it, and discussed it with that person. I might date though. Eventually it might get around to sex.
What are you talking about when you discuss rejection? Sex? You mention dating too. Dating ≠ sex, sex ≠ dating. Love ≠ sex, sex ≠ love. Those things are only present in tandem if the price is right. No, that's a game show. If the chemistry is there. Each of those can be individual, or combined. I want them all combined. That's just me. At my life stage now.
Some people like to date a lot, and don't make commitments and don't have sex either. Some people seem to fall in love, without even having dated or have had sex. Some people have sex, just to have sex. Obviously people are weird.
The age thing can be daunting if a person isn't into it. Especially older women, younger men. For the biological reason. If the woman has not had kids, and does not want to have kids, and the younger man does... Too bad. Too late. There is adoption and surrogate mothers. But the woman will not be bearing his child.
Age in regards to an older man, younger woman, the child thing still is there. She might be able to have his kids, even if she's 20 now and he's 40. She's got a good 10 years. And another 10 years after that which are fairly good. But what about daddy's age? Daddy will be 50 if mama has baby at 30. Daddy will be 60 and thinking retirement if mama has baby at 40.
My mum died at 81. My dad died at about... hmm...maybe 65? So daddy dies at 65, when the child is 5 years old? Or at 15 years old? Yah, mama can remarry, but most mama's that want to have the father around, they want him around for the entire child-raising process. Not to keel over before the child is self-sufficient.
THAT is why there is an age problem. Reproductive strategy. Financial and emotional security.
LePetitePrince, I am afraid to ask, but here goes... Are you sexually attracted to every female on the face of the planet? Are you? If not, there are going to be some you think of in other ways. Like as friends. And you won't keep a girlfriend long if you cheat on her, because some other girl comes along and propositions you and you fail to mention that you have a girlfriend.
In some employment situations, relationships are heavily frowned upon, and one or both of you could lose your jobs. So much for working on a career, you can now work on finding a new job. Which will be kind of complicated, because you'll have no fixed schedule and will have to back out of dates at the last moment if you get called in for a good interview.
Yes, I realize that some people DO play games. I know that. I don't know why. I know some people lie. I know people cheat and steal and beat and kill. But everyone doesn't. I don't.
And sometimes during the dating process, that started off with being very attracted to someone, it just fizzles out. It's not you, it's me. No, really, it's me. All me.
Let's say you really did like someone, who gave you one of those lines. And she WAS telling the truth. And you get all snippy about it.
Later on (weeks later?), you see her with someone new. And you sarcastically say something. And she says that things are now uncomplicated, just like she said they would be, and now she is dating again, isn't celibate, and this guy is the new boyfriend.
You THOUGHT she was blowing you off. She really DID have something to get done. Once done, she was free to date again. She wasn't blowing you off. But you blew it. And all this blowing isn't happening to you. hahaha.
I'm really terrible today.
WOAAAAHHH! I just said "yeah,right" and you fire me with all this ! ok i ll shoot you back!! muhahaaha ! besides ,maybe i was trying to flirt you with my eyes but i felt shy so they rolled around , but i said "maybe" ...maybe it's not true ...or it is? hmmm
As for your question , no of course i am not attracted to every female on earth but I simply don't believe in real friendship between the 2 genders (unless if it's childhood friendship then it's another story) . The male has no interest to become a "friend" with a female unless if he finds her attractive .
As for females , when the female meets the males she scans him like a star trek handled scanner and if she finds him cool or hot then she puts him on the "hot guys" list and incautiously these guys can be potential BFs , and if she finds him unattractive but nice then she'll directly put him on the "friends" list of her mind ==> in other hand , the guys that she feels attracted to them and she thinks of them as high quality guys are on the "hot guys" list (in reality it's "potential BFs" list) and the guys that she finds them ugly , unattractive , dork , low quality males but nice and good listeners of her nagging and complaints abt her bf are on the "friends" list . ===> this is called the LADDER theory.
Sorry to shock you but this true in 99% of the cases , just go back to school/college days and try to remember :
-Never noticed how the popular/babes/pretty girls in schools and college were always used to be surrounded by male "friends" ??
-Never noticed that the fat/ugly girls in schools and colleges usually only have female friends and very rarely males ones ? and if she had a male friend is usually because he's the bf of her pretty friend?
Wonder why ...wonder why ...hmmm
and here is a better one:
-Never notice that the overweighted /short/unattractive guys (specially the overweighted guys!) are usually surrounded by female friends? --> because he is always secretly in LOVE with one of these females friends but the poor is on the "friends list" , I know that because i am a guy and my fat friends always admitted that little secret to me .
As for me , I hate to play these BS lying games ..I hate to pretend that i am trying to befriend with a girl because i find her attractive or to befriend with unattractive girl to approach her pretty friend, and I hate the fact that a girl wants me just as a friend BECAUSE she finds me unattractive , "second-class" or beta male not worth of company but just worth of a friend and listener of her complaints , this whole friendship of hers is based on the fact that she finds me unattractive/ugly/beta but nice .
That's why my friendship with females is extremely limited to none and when i feel that a female is trying to transform me into a "Complaints ' Listener friend" (complaints abt a guy mostly) I kill this friendship immediately or slowly by showing no interest , and this happened to me not long time ago .
This is a personal opinion but I know it 's a fact in most of the cases.
Last edited by LePetitPrince on 05 Jun 2007, 3:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limerence
I am not confused about the meaning at all. You are clearly not sharing my definition, which happens to be the normative sense, I really can't more specific and I know whatever I say you would love to sit and pick apart and contradict for your own amusement. I did not read your whole post because it was just a random jumble of words tbh.
...Or maybe I was just too stupid to understand.
You are not too stupid, just misunderstanding. Most of the members on this board have some form of Autism right? This means we find most people confusing (NT's). I do find women confusing in general too no matter how in love she was with me. I would not understand why *stereotype alert* she would want to spend $300 on a handbag. My quote relates to relationships and the BS women (NT) will say when they are not interested i.e. low interest level.
I am having a lot of trouble relating my wisdom about NT's on this messageboard because it's really two different worlds. I spend a lot of time around NT's during the day and I suppose I expect some kind of understanding of what I am expressing. I now realise this is flawed. I feel like I either have to 100% embrace the AS way of thinking or 100% embrace the NT way. THAT IS WHAT CONFUSES ME.
Guys use some of these. I've used this one recently.
I told her it was me when it really was her... : / Does that make me a bad man? I didn't want her to feel bad about her glaring psychological problems. I'm huge on people telling the truth but think of how scarring that would have been for me to tell her that maybe she needed a lot of psychological help... or that maybe I was a little afraid of her belligerent paranoid.
The best way to break it off is to tell someone "This just isn't working out." But sometimes people demand reasons, when it just doesn't matter. If someone isn't interested or they don't want to go any further, then that's it.
*shrugs*
Yep... About 70% of the time, that'll do it.
GoonSquad
Veteran
Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...
Guys use some of these. I've used this one recently.
When I've been in a position where I had to reject a woman that's what I usually say.
I always make a huge effort to spare their feelings because the truth is I'm usually rejecting them because they aren't physically appealing or their personality annoys the hell out of me.
Why tell them the truth? It won't help anything and it will hurt them.
In spite of my efforts to be nice, they always get spiteful and nasty!
Ahh women... It's a good thing God made 'em so cute.
_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus
LePetitePrince:
If you ARE flirting, you HAVE to put in *Flirt* or else I won't get it. I don't think there is a flirting emoticon. The wink could do, but it can also mean kidding or being a tad sarcastic in a silly manner. Oh, and it helps to qualify the *flirt* with a "I LIKE YOU, like you" or "It's a friendly flirt but I'm not seriously flirting". Stupid language. It means too many things.
At least the rolling eyes didn't roll across the floor. That goes beyond flirting and into the realm of icky things.
You said (i'm not doing that quote thing):
"The male has no interest to become a "friend" with a female unless if he finds her attractive ."
Is that true? Really? I mean, do most guys think that way? Maybe it's just young guys?
I didn't pay a lot of attention to the people in college and university. I was totally clueless when someone put a note wanting to hook up if I didn't have boyfriend in my backpack. He was like 20 and I was 33 or so. Hah! But he didn't know I was older. I told him, and that changed things, fast. Oh well.
======
nb411:
I don't KNOW what the normative sense is when you talk about love. Your idea doesn't make sense to me. When I pick apart an idea or thought, it isn't personal, like going after YOU. It's more going after ME and my OWN set of beliefs. Questioning my OWN beliefs by asking you about yours.
If you choose to explain or defend your own beliefs, and I can do the same with mine, I might learn something. I might learn I am totally wrong. I might learn that I have had some assumptions that do not prove to be true. I NEED to know that.
Life in a journey. We don't really want to reach the destination, as it's death. Hah! So it's the journey in life that is the good part. I want to be sure the best I can be, that I understand.
======
Alternative:
Funny and cute are big attractions. To me anyway. The cute part can be in the way a person handles themselves too, not just appearance. Funny lasts forever. Intellect. While we age and our appearance changes, those funny things and the intelligent conversations, those can still go on.
If you folks take a look at the elderly, can you tell who was the hot guy or gal in their time? Probably not. So what's left is the inner self. That's the part I like to take a long look at. Because that's the part that will be around when we are old.
Clearly, she wants an incestuous relationship.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Recent Setbacks for Women/Women’s Rights |
01 Feb 2025, 4:47 pm |
Women's pronouns |
01 Feb 2025, 8:35 am |
Women and slaves. |
09 Nov 2024, 6:59 am |
Struggling to attract women |
01 Dec 2024, 5:07 pm |