Page 3 of 3 [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

04 Jan 2021, 3:28 pm

Breanbyurn wrote:
I guess it also depends on the ability of the individual(s) involved, and their health state maybe. I checked the distance on the map the other day at where I started to feel a "step up" in the connection, and it was 3.6 km/2.2 miles. But it also worked from 6.9 km/4.3 mi., meaning the dream transfer and the scent transfer as well.


That seems reasonable. It's my experience too that it works best within that kind distance. For longer distances, it's mostly the direction sense that works.

Breanbyurn wrote:
Is there a way to deliberately get into that communication-state?


I think it gets easier with practise, but I know of no short-cuts.



wastubricine
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2021
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 52

05 Jan 2021, 8:58 am

Interesting discussion. Have you guys heard about the following project? I'm a new user and can't post links yet, but make a search on the exact terms "Can Organisms Sense via Radio Frequency?" and "Biological Radio: Can Some Animals Communicate Using Radio Waves?"

The 1st one leads to a DARPA project of researching the possibility of radio-communication in the GHz range with the help of ciliated photocytes.



wastubricine
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2021
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 52

08 Jan 2021, 4:09 am

rdos wrote:

Based on the need for two different detectors with some distance and a rather long wave-length, I think the best bet is in the arms. That also tends to explain why some (including myself) can detect water in the ground. The common theme here is horisontal arms and some tool to display the results. It's traditionally associated with a tree branch, but I used a bolt or ring in a string. It works by sending out electromagnetic waves and then detecting how they are reflected back by water. It's much like a radar but with longer wavelengths. The system is not completely under voluntary control, rather it is the brain that operates the detecting tool in an unconscious manner. My mother who showed me how to do it always claimed that it moved all by itself, but I think it is moved by the brain, but not based on free will.



I liked your water detection anecdote! Can I ask you whether it was a folk tradition that your mother and you inherited, and if so, of what ethnic group? I'm very interested in these kind of things! Thank you.



wastubricine
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2021
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 52

08 Jan 2021, 4:35 am

Here's the links to the above articles I posted above, looks like I can post links now (but can't go back and edit my original post, how odd): https://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/ ... -frequency

https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2019/07/ ... dio-waves/



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

08 Jan 2021, 10:47 am

wastubricine wrote:
I liked your water detection anecdote! Can I ask you whether it was a folk tradition that your mother and you inherited, and if so, of what ethnic group? I'm very interested in these kind of things! Thank you.


Traditionally, wells in my country were not dug just anywhere, rather somebody that knew about how to find water was consulted for a good place. That's in contrast to how modern wells are drilled. It's also quite significant because many modern wells are maybe 50-100 meters deep, while the old ones are only a few meters. In fact, since modern drilling doesn't care about where it is most likely to find water, they will typically drill until they hit the deep ground water level. Of course, this was not possible before motorized drill rigs were invented, and so people needed to dig at the right place.

So, it was pretty interesting to test the state above wells, and I found out that practically all wells were dug where water currents crossed and had strong signals of water.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

08 Jan 2021, 10:49 am

wastubricine wrote:
Here's the links to the above articles I posted above, looks like I can post links now (but can't go back and edit my original post, how odd): https://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/ ... -frequency

https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2019/07/ ... dio-waves/


That's interesting stuff. :-)



wastubricine
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2021
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 52

09 Jan 2021, 11:46 am

rdos wrote:
wastubricine wrote:
I liked your water detection anecdote! Can I ask you whether it was a folk tradition that your mother and you inherited, and if so, of what ethnic group? I'm very interested in these kind of things! Thank you.


Traditionally, wells in my country were not dug just anywhere, rather somebody that knew about how to find water was consulted for a good place. That's in contrast to how modern wells are drilled. It's also quite significant because many modern wells are maybe 50-100 meters deep, while the old ones are only a few meters. In fact, since modern drilling doesn't care about where it is most likely to find water, they will typically drill until they hit the deep ground water level. Of course, this was not possible before motorized drill rigs were invented, and so people needed to dig at the right place.

So, it was pretty interesting to test the state above wells, and I found out that practically all wells were dug where water currents crossed and had strong signals of water.


Thanks. :)



Temeraire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,520
Location: Wiltshire, U.K.

11 Jan 2021, 5:34 am

goldfish21 wrote:
rdos wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
It’s been MY personal experience that so much of neurodiversity is in the gut/enteric nervous system & that common food chemical sensitivities are to blame for depression and anxiety; and in turn that altering the gut microbiome via diet/natural medicine, as well as healing the intestinal lining to reduce chemical sensitivities, can make a dramatic improvement in mood/depression/anxiety etc.

IMO that’s the neurodiverse commonality.


Words is not enough. You need to prove your "commonality".

I don't dispute that food & chemical sensitivies plays a role in the severity of autism, but it certainly is not the main player. This only affects a minority of NDs, and even after they have been treated / removed the sensitivites, they still don't end up as anything similar to NTs. And most importantly, it doesn't change their preferences a bit.


How tf are commonalities supposed to be communicated if not by words? :? Go read the words in recent autism studies: 70% of people on the autism spectrum are sensitive to salicylate acids. (plants’ natural pesticide & preservative, boosted sky high in gmo foods) And the root cause of said sensitivity is perforated leaky intestines (leaky gut) caused by intestinal dysbiosis/fungal infections etc. Science, math/stats, words.. unless you prefer sign language? I can finger spell it out for you - but they’re still words.

Cite your sources. Which studies say that dealing with/treating chemical sensitivities in autistics doesn’t improve their functioning? Are they the same studies that don’t acknowledge 70% as the majority vs a minority of cases? :? :roll:


If this were true you would be a very rich man by now Goldfish.

I have personal experience of eating fast food nearly everyday for months and I lost 3 stone and felt marvellous.
More energy, faster reactions, I was like a new woman.
Can I promote this as commonality because it happened to me?
Would this work for everyone and cure all ailments and evils?
Who can prove it didn't happen or my fast food eating program doesn't work?