Stayed with him despite horrific burns

Post Reply New Topic

It's doubtful, but there's a lot of revenge in prison and afterward.

By the way all you have to do is the read the comments on YouTube and the daily mail to see the vast majority of people are on the acid attack victims side and there not justifying the attackers actions like you are.

This is why I block people on chat rooms / message boards who tell me "You look like a serial killer / pedophile." and I report them. I have no patience for this crap, especially after raising 3 kids and one grandkid in a safe environment who had all been abused by natural fathers.

As a lot of people know on wrong planet I have been told by some people I look like a pedophile which is frustrating naturally.

Wtf?

When did I justify the attackers actions?

I said he served his sentence and should be released.

Same; only with more scars.

You'd be hard pressed to find a person who can beat up a chimp, not just because of their strength, but also because (and this is what I meant), chimps bite and attack the eyes, crotch, fingers, toes, ears, etc. Victims of maulings by chimps lose eyes, ears, fingers and have severe hand, foot, genital and facial injuries.

What I was saying is that if someone SA'd someone I cared deeply about, I'd literally (not figuratively) chew their face off.

I don't really understand the general point/subject of your post to be honest, and I don't know why you have quoted me, but when I said:

"How awful for him though"-

I was referring to the victim of the acid attack.
Not the perpetrator.

Thank you

Last edited by Cigalle33 on 15 Sep 2023, 10:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Yeah, okay, but the nature of planning, orchestrating an acid attack, e.g. buying the acid and having the intent to cause such grievous injuries, is highly sinister and grave in nature.
It's not in any range of normal behaviour.
It's the behaviour of an extremely dangerous individual.

And they got the intended target wrong. ! !! !! !!

(Which by the way, means the general public was their target just by default).

That in itself makes this person even more volatile, erratic and dangerous in my opinion, if you want to argue the point.

Yet the three higest ranking judges in the UK came to the conclusion he was not a danger to society.

Well maybe they are wrong.

It's not impossible.

Please bear in mind also, that the man he threw acid at is now permanently scarred so severely he is unrecognisable from his former self.
He is blind in one eye and will never regain vision in that eye, which actually makes him registered disabled, when he was formally completely healthy.
It has had devastating long-term repercussions for him- probably including severe PTSD- many of which won't ever completely go away.
His wife stayed with him, but she could just as easily have left, meaning he had limited chances of ever meeting another partner, significantly lowering quality of life.
Plus he would have lost his marriage.
He has probably lost his former career.

I don't see why somebody who can do that level of damage should only get a few years in prison.
I think they should never be let out again.

I do indeed hope that he won't attack anybody else, definitely.
Hopefully their risk assessment is correct.

But in any case, one of my sincerest opinions is that the worst punishment should be given to acid attackers regardless, once they've committed the crime, just to deter others from using the same method to attack somebody.

I stand by that even if those judges haven't reached that conclusion.
Mostly because the UK justice system is, frankly, warped in certain areas.

I dread to think what kind of internal corruption there is inside the justice system & prisons.

Although I know a tiny smidge about some of it because my ex partner was in prison for 3 months and got beaten up by guards, & cell mates, who suffered no repercussions.

My dad said if someone threw acid in his face that he would do exactly the same thing back to them. Eye for an eye.

An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.

Nonsensical logic from your father

Logic has nothing to do with it. It's an emotional response.

Public school twits. Probably never been right about anything in their lives except perhaps what wine to pair with Beouf Bourgignon

Yes, hence why I said "nonsensical".

It doesn't serve anything to retaliate with more violence