A REALLY hot girl knocked on my door...
Sure. What REASON to beat your
wife, when she is so submissive?
But the point is that the law made
women endure what they otherwise
wouldn't. You don't seem to want
another human - you want chattel.
'Tis trivial enough to so dominate
someone, even without resort to
the law. One tries to be fair though.
I certainly aim for those with whom
I can share love and decisions with,
NOT someone I can order.
Someday though, you'll have just
what you wish. There will be automata
which will follow your every whim.
another human.
Now you're getting it. I guess I've finally said it enough times, that you now understand I want to stay single.
"He can be taught!"
Ugh, no! The thought of me having complete control over another human being turns my stomach. (I have enough trouble taking care of a totally-dependent parrot.)
I don't want a woman under any terms whatsoever, even if those terms were my complete authority. Because, like I said, I'm not the type who naturally likes to command or lead.
Someday though, you'll have just
what you wish. There will be automata
which will follow your every whim.
I guess you're just not educable to the reality that I don't like ordering people around.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
My point, restated yet again, is that I don't have what it takes to be in a healthy relationship. I'm fairly certain this would remain true even if a woman's fondest wish was to submit to me -- I'd STILL feel unnatural in the role of leader.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
My point, restated yet again, is that I don't have what it takes to be in a healthy relationship.
Why do relationships have to be about ordering people around?
It's my desire to just explore ideas and come to understandings about things so what happens is mutually understood. I'm not going to command her and say, "do this for me... NOW!! !"
Or if there is a disagreement, we are each humble enough to accept it and just do what the other wants... out of love for each other. Compromising and such and such...
I am not going to try to "control" my wife, and I expect her to not do the same with me. In fact it's probably the only thing I am truly demanding and controlling about... don't manipulate me...
_________________
Wonder what it feels like to be in love?
How would you describe it, like a push or shove?
Guess I could pretend that this is all I need
Wanting more than what I have might appear as greed.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
My point, restated yet again, is that I don't have what it takes to be in a healthy relationship.
Why do relationships have to be about ordering people around?
![Image](http://www.bagendinn.com/sean/images/events/facepalm_small.jpg)
They're not!
I was responding to cal's "what you want" statement that, according to him, what I want is a will-less woman or something, which is not the case; I was saying I DON'T want that, neither would a healthy relationship consist of such. I was addressing two different points in quick succession -- sorry if it came out confusing.
What I consider the ideal is the Biblical model of marriage.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Last edited by Ragtime on 02 Oct 2007, 8:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
I kind of wonder where this lack of a desire to lead comes from. I seem to have it too, and it's sort of counter to what it means to be a man...
Though not all men have to... or even should lead...
_________________
Wonder what it feels like to be in love?
How would you describe it, like a push or shove?
Guess I could pretend that this is all I need
Wanting more than what I have might appear as greed.
Though not all men have to... or even should lead...
Well, I have leadership in small quantities. But, I really think my main lack of it is from the way I was raised. I was raised almost entirely by my mom. And it takes a father, ideally, to train his son to fully grow into the man he's supposed to be. I didn't really get any male leadership training, so I'm grappling with mentally putting together a picture of the type of marriage the Bible speaks of. I have to simply imagine it, and it's difficult.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Ah yes, I remember you posted in that other thread about fathers... our experiences are sort of similar in that regard.
I see the ideal, and it looks nice to me... in an fantasy type sense... but I'm not really set up to act like the stereotypical husband.
I'm not giving up that the kind of relationship I would work well in doesn't exist though... just with women that are more unique.
_________________
Wonder what it feels like to be in love?
How would you describe it, like a push or shove?
Guess I could pretend that this is all I need
Wanting more than what I have might appear as greed.
Ah yes, I remember you posted in that other thread about fathers... our experiences are sort of similar in that regard.
I see the ideal, and it looks nice to me... in an fantasy type sense... but I'm not really set up to act like the stereotypical husband.
I'm not giving up that the kind of relationship I would work well in doesn't exist though... just with women that are more unique.
Well, of course, I speak from experience, as one who has been married. That "ideal" is like the smooth air pockets a passenger jet hits -- the pilot has to do his best to fly the plane right, and then HOPE he hits as much smooth air as possible. In other words, the ideal moments in marriage aren't producable -- they just show up when they do, and leave when they do. You just have to try and steer the relationship right, and not get emotionally dependent on the random good times. "I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happen to them all" (Eccl 9:11).
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Sedaka
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=5783.jpg)
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind
not - but sadly, there probably are.
Long, long ago, in a land far, far away -- there were submissive women. Seriously, there were, cal! (I'm just remarking on your interesting use of the word "probably".) You act like "submissive women" is a concept which stretches the bounds of your imagination. (Frankly, I kind of find them hard to picture, myself -- but that's because I've rarely encountered any, being born and raised in modern America in 1979.)
i would be sad too if he found a woman who WANTED to live that role
It would be sad that she would be happy? That's interesting. Sad for whom?
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
And anyway, you missed that I have given up on all women. That doesn't mean I'm still watching -- that means I'm completely done with them, relationship-wise. I can be polite and truly respectful, and I can work professionally with them, but I will never trust them profoundly or intimately.
Toward that conclusion, I also wrote that I'm not a leader. I just don't have the desire to command or lead. And therefore, I inherently lack the impluse necessary for a man to be in a healthy relationship. Some people are meant to stay single -- and I'm one of them.
Now, make no mistake -- even those guys who are leaders have their work cut out for them as far as relationships go, for they will continue to find their women both aggressively challenging and seeking to usurp their rightful authority. Therefore, the only difference between a leading man and a non-leading man is that the leader can more likely keep his woman on track, and hence, their relationship running smoothly and productively. (I say "more likely", because the woman is still capable of upsetting a smooth-running relationship to the point where it becomes nearly impossible. *I speak from personal marital experience.)
Whereas, someone like me would have too much apathy to hold the reins fulltime. I can lead well, but it's short-term -- not something I could do for even a straight month. It's simply not my natural state. And that's okay -- it just means I should be single. So really, my burden is light: It means I don't have to produce children, raise them, feed them, break my back working for them, and then possibly have them reject me after all that I've done for them. I don't have to do any of that!
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
well... good to see these ideas are being bred out of the grander picture.... EVOLUTION
i didnt miss any of your points... and i have just as much business "harping" as you do spewing this completely BS sexist view.
sorry for your frustration and gl finding your "little woman"
_________________
Neuroscience PhD student
got free science papers?
www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl
Sedaka
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=5783.jpg)
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind
another human.
Now you're getting it. I guess I've finally said it enough times, that you now understand I want to stay single.
"He can be taught!"
Ugh, no! The thought of me having complete control over another human being turns my stomach. (I have enough trouble taking care of a totally-dependent parrot.)
I don't want a woman under any terms whatsoever, even if those terms were my complete authority. Because, like I said, I'm not the type who naturally likes to command or lead.
Someday though, you'll have just
what you wish. There will be automata
which will follow your every whim.
I guess you're just not educable to the reality that I don't like ordering people around.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
My point, restated yet again, is that I don't have what it takes to be in a healthy relationship. I'm fairly certain this would remain true even if a woman's fondest wish was to submit to me -- I'd STILL feel unnatural in the role of leader.
cal.... he wants them to follow every one of his sexual and domestic whims... yet retain enough of an autonomous nature to be able to sing and dance and entertain him for when he doesnt know what he wants
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
and cut the "i wanna stay single" crap..... i believe that about as much as you saying you were asexual or homosexual... for whatever transient length of time that was............. ROFL
this whole sexist view point is just a way to displace your failures in relationships (as a couple, not trying to blame anything on you IRL)... but all you're doing is trying to place the blame all on the female aspect... which is good for your consience maybe... but limits your future success (as i sincerely doubt there are many women who [if they had heard all this rubbish from your mouth] would honestly be fullfilled in a relationship with you).
point is... it's not about women appeasing men or men trying to placate women.... it should be a mutual thing. you'll only ever find LOVE when it's equal from both sides in all aspects.
_________________
Neuroscience PhD student
got free science papers?
www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
gl finding your "little woman"
Well, u missed one there, since I'm not looking. My mate radar has been shut down and mothballed -- I have "left the dating scene", and I'm "out of the picture".
The reason is that I know what kind of life I want, and that's the kind of life where I'm the only person on my premises.
And, BTW, here's a little science for you: evolutionists don't automatically breed evolutionist children, neither do creationists breed creationist children -- each child makes up his or her own mind, especially in pluralistic societies such as ours. So, if you ever have one, your child might grow up to be a creationist.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
From where did u pull this idea? Don't presume to tell me what I want -- and you're so off it's ridiculous.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Sedaka thought to herself: "I know, let's just make stuff up about Ragtime!
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
I'm not ruled by my emotions. Therefore, my "want" is defined by my decisions in how I'm going to live my life.
Yes, I agree, just like the Apostle Paul wrote. Husbands and wives both have responsibilities to each other.
"Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.
Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water through the word, and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church—for we are members of his body. 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.' This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church. However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband" (Ephesians 5:22-33).
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Last edited by Ragtime on 02 Oct 2007, 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What I consider the ideal is the Biblical model of marriage.
Like marrying one's own daughters?
Actually, no.
![Shocked 8O](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Last edited by Ragtime on 02 Oct 2007, 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
cal.... he wants them to follow every one of his sexual and domestic whims... yet retain enough of an autonomous nature to be able to sing and dance and entertain him for when he doesnt know what he wants
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Ah! Well that's fair. 'Tis all I want too.
Or else I'll sulk.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
point is... it's not about women appeasing men or men trying to placate women.... it should be a mutual thing. you'll only ever find LOVE when it's equal from both sides in all aspects.
"Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything..." (Ephesians 5:22-33).
Of course! One misogynist teaches the other.
Sometimes you come across as reasonable,
that I forget you buy that crap, from some
con artist who never even met the philosopher.