09 Nov 2007, 10:19 am
Ragtime wrote:
gwenevyn wrote:
I don't want a fighter. I already had one of those. I theorize that guys who turn their aggression on when faced with a sports game or battlefield are an unfortunate myth of fiction. Fighters are fighters 24/7.
Ya, I understand this. I'm that way about passionate women. They usually have tempers, because they can't turn off the passion. I already had one of those. I'd rather have a kind smile than blazing eyes -- though, a little blaze is good.
Interesting thought! I might reform my opinion.
Perhaps there are different kinds of passion? I'm passionate in, uh, that way, if you get my drift, but I'm not a real ambitious go-getter about other subjects (career, pasttimes, etc.)--I take my time and think hard about what I want and other priorities take precedence. Likewise, I have an impatient streak that I have to work hard to maintain control over under select circumstances, but I don't have much of a temper at all with my significant other. It would take something major for me to be upset.
09 Nov 2007, 10:39 am
zen_mistress wrote:
I like him. He sort of has a feminine face, he's not all macho. Yet very masculine.
He's very handsome 
09 Nov 2007, 10:47 am
Sedaka
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind
09 Nov 2007, 1:29 pm
Pandora wrote:
zen_mistress wrote:
I like him. He sort of has a feminine face, he's not all macho. Yet very masculine.
He's very handsome he looks like rob schnider with hair extensions.... and he's not doin rob no favors.
09 Nov 2007, 2:24 pm
gwenevyn wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
gwenevyn wrote:
I don't want a fighter. I already had one of those. I theorize that guys who turn their aggression on when faced with a sports game or battlefield are an unfortunate myth of fiction. Fighters are fighters 24/7.
Ya, I understand this. I'm that way about passionate women. They usually have tempers, because they can't turn off the passion. I already had one of those. I'd rather have a kind smile than blazing eyes -- though, a little blaze is good.
Interesting thought! I might reform my opinion.
Perhaps there are different kinds of passion? I'm passionate in, uh, that way, if you get my drift, but I'm not a real ambitious go-getter about other subjects (career, pasttimes, etc.)--I take my time and think hard about what I want and other priorities take precedence.
Oh, there was plenty of good passion, if you get my drift. But, I then had to take the bad with the good. Passion can be either a vehicle for love, or for anger.
I guess the best combination, then, is: passionate partner with self-control.
09 Nov 2007, 3:04 pm
pandabear wrote:
Beowulf?
But aren't women supposed to be conditioned to fall in love with whatever male image the film industry happens to be marketing?
But aren't women supposed to be conditioned to fall in love with whatever male image the film industry happens to be marketing?
I don't know when you are going to get it into your thick little ursine skull that women are not simple, hormonal animals with no free will, imagination or individuality. Men have individual tastes, therefore why shouldn't women?
I am female, and I never follow such social trends.
Unless, of course, they make a JtHM movie; in which case I stand corrected.
10 Nov 2007, 1:24 pm
10 Nov 2007, 3:30 pm
10 Nov 2007, 6:00 pm
Aridarr wrote:
I don't know when you are going to get it into your thick little ursine skull that women are not simple, hormonal animals with no free will, imagination or individuality. Men have individual tastes, therefore why shouldn't women?
I am female, and I never follow such social trends.
Unless, of course, they make a JtHM movie; in which case I stand corrected.
I don't know what JtHM is, but does that mean that women are simple, hormonal animals with no free will, imagination, or originality, and that my thick little ursine skull is safe for the time being?
10 Nov 2007, 6:01 pm
RainSong wrote:
pandabear wrote:
...coupled with that "come hither" expression on his face...
Is that what that is? I thought he looked extraordinarily confused.
Not attracted, sorry.
You may be better at reading faces than I am.
10 Nov 2007, 8:34 pm
10 Nov 2007, 8:35 pm
richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind
10 Nov 2007, 9:52 pm
Kilroy wrote:
I like guys so I can vote
haha, awesome.
10 Nov 2007, 11:14 pm
11 Nov 2007, 10:31 am
I posted that picture because some women say they want their man to "fight for" them. But I've discovered that phrase has another meaning in modern times, which my ex-wife used on me, and which my friend's ex-girlfriend used on him: by their meaning of "fight for", they mean compete for their love -- jealously get into fights with other men in order to win her love. 
What. Ever.
11 Nov 2007, 10:37 am
I think you forgot to invite someone to this thread...
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Trump defunds Trans women from women’s sports |
05 Feb 2025, 5:14 pm |
| Recent Setbacks for Women/Women’s Rights |
Yesterday, 12:47 am |
| We have not heard from Carly Fleishmann in 6 years |
21 Feb 2025, 11:48 pm |
| I have a question for women 40 and over |
Yesterday, 1:23 am |
